07.04.2013 Views

Japan and the Japanese

Japan and the Japanese

Japan and the Japanese

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

426 JAPAN. - A. D. 17791791.<br />

his translations, <strong>the</strong> one to which Titsingh<br />

ascribed <strong>the</strong><br />

greatest importance was that of <strong>the</strong> Nipon o dai ifsi Ran, an abridged<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>ese chronicle, from A. c. 600 to A. D. 1611, compiled in <strong>the</strong><br />

year 1652, <strong>and</strong> printed<br />

at Miako. Having been carefully compared<br />

by Klaproth with <strong>the</strong> original<br />

a task, as he says, from <strong>the</strong> manifold<br />

defects of Titsingh's version, almost equivalent to a new trans-<br />

lation <strong>and</strong> having been enriched with an introduction, a supple-<br />

ment <strong>and</strong> notes, this work was published in 1834, in French, at<br />

<strong>the</strong> expense of <strong>the</strong> Oriental Translation Fund, under <strong>the</strong> title of<br />

" Antiales des Enpereurs du <strong>Japan</strong>."<br />

Though highly valuable as a specimen of what <strong>Japan</strong>ese histories<br />

are, <strong>and</strong> though Klaproth's introduction <strong>and</strong> notes contain some<br />

curious information, this performance is, on <strong>the</strong> whole, exceedingly<br />

dry, while it adds but little to <strong>the</strong> abstract given by Kampfer of<br />

thirf or some o<strong>the</strong>r similar work. A criticism which Titsingh him-<br />

self makes upon it, in a letter to <strong>the</strong> prince of Tamba, to whom he<br />

had intended to dedicate his translation, is worthy of notice, as<br />

going to show how little, with all its formal precision of years <strong>and</strong><br />

months, <strong>the</strong> earlier <strong>Japan</strong>ese chronology<br />

respect.<br />

" Must we not suppose," asks<br />

"<br />

Titsingh, that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>-<br />

is entitled to historical<br />

ese, so jealous of <strong>the</strong>ir neighbors, <strong>the</strong> Chinese, have, in writing<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own history, endeavored to fill up many gaps in it by prolonging<br />

<strong>the</strong> reigns of <strong>the</strong>ir earlier Dairi ? There is in your history a<br />

period of one thous<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> sixty-one years occupied by <strong>the</strong> reigns<br />

of only sixteen Daivi. The duration of <strong>the</strong> life of Syn-mu, of <strong>the</strong><br />

reigns of Ko-a?i, of Sei-sum, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> life of O-sin, appear altoge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

improbable. The first died at <strong>the</strong> age of one hundred <strong>and</strong> twentyseven<br />

years. The second reigned one hundred <strong>and</strong> two years, <strong>the</strong><br />

third ninety-nine years. The last lived one hundred <strong>and</strong> ten years.<br />

These statements are too extraordinary to be blindly believed<br />

Grant, even, that a chaste <strong>and</strong> frugal way of living may have<br />

secured for <strong>the</strong>se princes a very advanced age, but how does it<br />

happen that, after Nin-tok-ten-o [<strong>the</strong> seventeenth Dairi], none exceeded<br />

<strong>the</strong> ordinary limit of human life ? "<br />

The <strong>Japan</strong>ese still cling with tenacity to <strong>the</strong> formal recognition<br />

of <strong>the</strong> absolute rights of <strong>the</strong> Dairi. With as much warmth as a<br />

loyal Englishman would exhibit in maintaining<br />

eignty of Queen Victoria, <strong>the</strong>y insisted to Titsingh<br />

<strong>the</strong> actual sover-<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> saou

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!