07.04.2013 Views

Cothurnia limnoriae - NSCEP | US EPA - US Environmental ...

Cothurnia limnoriae - NSCEP | US EPA - US Environmental ...

Cothurnia limnoriae - NSCEP | US EPA - US Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unknown: A species was classified as unknown when there was insufficient information<br />

to make a judgment as to its origin. This was the default classification in the absence of<br />

any evidence. In addition, taxa with an uncertain taxonomy (e.g., species complexes,<br />

taxon only identified to genus) were assigned an unknown classification except in cases<br />

when there is evidence that the taxon was recently introduced into an area (e.g., recent<br />

appearance of genus never observed within a region). Species with uncertain taxonomies<br />

have also been classified as “unresolved” (CANOD, 2009).<br />

Transient: Transient species are those that temporarily migrate into an area as a result of<br />

unusual climatic conditions, such as El Niño (e.g., Rosales-Casian, 2004). Their<br />

movement into the area is via natural mechanisms rather than mediated through direct<br />

human activities. The terms “vagrant” or “migrant” have been used in a similar fashion.<br />

Transient species were not included in the counts of NIS in regions or ecoregions.<br />

Conflict: In some cases, invasion experts disagree as to whether a species is<br />

nonindigenous versus native or cryptogenic within an area. If the available information<br />

was insufficient for us to make a decision among the conflicting classifications, species<br />

were assigned a “conflict” classification. Our use of “conflict” instead of “cryptogenic” is<br />

to highlight cases where some, but not all, of the experts believe that there is sufficient<br />

information to consider a species introduced. “Conflict” species were included in the<br />

counts of NIS in regions or ecoregions.<br />

Definitions for Species’ Population Status<br />

In addition to classifications related to origin, species were also classified in terms of their<br />

population status. Lee et al. (2012) present a set of criteria to evaluate population status. The<br />

following definitions were used in the Atlas and PICES database:<br />

Established: A species with a self-maintaining population as indicated by its population<br />

size, occurrence over time, widespread geographical distribution, presence of juveniles,<br />

and/or presence of reproductive adults. Pragmatically, the occurrence of a species in a<br />

probability-based survey (vs. targeted sampling of optimum habitat type) is reasonably<br />

strong evidence that the species is established based on the relatively small areas sampled<br />

in such random surveys (e.g., tens of square meters for benthic surveys). Native species<br />

are assumed to be established.<br />

Not Established: A species that has been reported from an area but that does not<br />

constitute a self-maintaining population or that has gone extinct within the region. One<br />

indication of non-establishment is not observing the species for ≥25 years, assuming that<br />

the appropriate habitat types were surveyed. Other indications include lack of juveniles or<br />

reproductive adults. By definition, transient species are considered not established.<br />

Nonindigenous species classified as not established were not included in the counts of<br />

NIS in regions or ecoregions.<br />

Unknown: A species for which there is insufficient spatial and/or temporal records to<br />

assess population status. This was the default population status. Nonindigenous species<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!