07.04.2013 Views

Cothurnia limnoriae - NSCEP | US EPA - US Environmental ...

Cothurnia limnoriae - NSCEP | US EPA - US Environmental ...

Cothurnia limnoriae - NSCEP | US EPA - US Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in the PICES database, the queries will require care and have certain limitations, as described in<br />

Lee et al. (2012).<br />

Maps of the 232 MEOW ecoregions plus our modifications are provided to assist users in<br />

understanding the extent and boundaries of the ecoregions (Figures 1-23). In addition, all four<br />

hierarchical MEOW levels can be viewed in the PICES database (Lee and Reusser, 2012) while<br />

the User’s Guide (Lee et al., 2012) contains an appendix listing all the realms, regions,<br />

provinces, and ecoregions along with their database identification numbers.<br />

Taxonomic Scope of the Atlas<br />

The taxonomic scope of our analysis includes fungi, protozoa, microalgae, macroalgae, marine<br />

plants, fishes, and all macroinvertebrate groups. Bacteria, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals<br />

were not included. Freshwater species that only incidentally occur in estuaries were excluded<br />

(e.g., crayfish that are washed downstream after storms), though species that are primarily fresh<br />

water but periodically occur in estuaries (e.g., New Zealand mud snails) were included. We also<br />

excluded species that are primarily terrestrial, though species that occur in the supralittoral zone<br />

and coastal dunes were included. We did not include tidal marsh plants (other than Spartina) in<br />

part due to the difficulty in obtaining information on similar species in Asia.<br />

Definitions for Species’ Invasion and Population Status<br />

Species were assigned to one of six classifications regarding their origin – Native,<br />

Nonindigenous, Cryptogenic, Transient, Unknown, or Conflict – at any of the four biogeographic<br />

levels (realm to ecoregion). Criteria to evaluate whether a species is native or introduced were<br />

developed by Chapman and Carlton (1991 and 1994), and these criteria are discussed in Lee et<br />

al. (2012). The following definitions were used for these classifications in the Atlas and PICES<br />

database:<br />

Native: A species that occurs naturally in the area with no human intervention. Native<br />

species have an evolutionary history within the area.<br />

Nonindigenous: A species that has been introduced into an area through human activities,<br />

whether accidently or on purpose. Other terms used include alien, aquatic nuisance<br />

species (ANS), exotic, introduced, non-native, adventive, and naturalized. In the United<br />

States, use of “invasive” is largely limited to invaders that have or are likely to cause<br />

adverse ecological, economic, or human health impacts.<br />

Cryptogenic: Cryptogenic species those that are not clearly native or introduced based on<br />

current information. As originally defined by Carlton (1966), this term was to capture<br />

uncertainty regarding a species biogeography and invasion history. However,<br />

“cryptogenic” is increasingly used for species with taxonomic uncertainties, such as<br />

sibling (cryptic) species or species complexes. To avoid mixing uncertainty over invasion<br />

history with taxonomic uncertainty, we restricted the use of cryptogenic classifications to<br />

locations where there is some evidence for invasion. Cryptogenic species were not<br />

included in the NIS counts for regions and ecoregions..<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!