07.04.2013 Views

Dehydrator Onion Bulb Weight and Water-soluble Carbohydrates ...

Dehydrator Onion Bulb Weight and Water-soluble Carbohydrates ...

Dehydrator Onion Bulb Weight and Water-soluble Carbohydrates ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 124(6):581–586. 1999.<br />

<strong>Dehydrator</strong> <strong>Onion</strong> <strong>Bulb</strong> <strong>Weight</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Water</strong>-<strong>soluble</strong><br />

<strong>Carbohydrates</strong> before <strong>and</strong> after Maturity<br />

Arthur D. Wall, 1 Marisa M. Wall, 2 <strong>and</strong> Joe N. Corgan 3<br />

Department of Agronomy <strong>and</strong> Horticulture, Box 30003, MSC 3Q, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces,<br />

NM, 88003<br />

ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Allium cepa L., nonstructural carbohydrates, <strong>soluble</strong> solids, fructans, sugars, bulb mass, bulb size,<br />

high performance liquid chromatography<br />

ABSTRACT. <strong>Onion</strong>s (Allium cepa L.) with ≥18% bulb dry weight are dehydrated <strong>and</strong> used for spices <strong>and</strong> food ingredients. <strong>Bulb</strong><br />

weight characteristics <strong>and</strong> water-<strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrates (WSC) of two commercial dehydrator cultivars, GS02 <strong>and</strong> GS04,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a breeding population, NM9335, were studied before <strong>and</strong> after maturity to observe phenotypic traits that may be useful<br />

for selection during breeding programs, <strong>and</strong> to study dehydrator onion carbohydrate physiology. At maturity, NM9335,<br />

GS02, <strong>and</strong> GS04 bulbs had 11.9 ± 0.33%, 18.6 ± 0.27%, <strong>and</strong> 19.4 ± 0.40% dry weight, respectively. Mature GS04 plants had<br />

76.5 ± 0.01% of whole plant dry weight in bulbs, which is an extraordinarily high crop harvest index. NM9335 bulbs had<br />

higher fresh (hydrated) weight than bulbs of GS04 <strong>and</strong> GS02, but bulbs in all populations accumulated similar amounts of<br />

dry weight. <strong>Bulb</strong> percent dry weight before maturity did not indicate percent dry weight at maturity in the high-solids<br />

commercial onion cultivars. <strong>Bulb</strong> percent dry weight declined slightly after maturity in all populations. Glucose, fructose,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sucrose were relatively low, <strong>and</strong> fructans with degree of polymerization ≥6 were relatively high in GS04, but the converse<br />

was observed in NM9335. Relative amounts of GSO4 bulb fructan increased sequentially, in order of rank, from DP4 to DP6,<br />

but the converse was observed for NM9335.<br />

White-skinned onion cultivars are dehydrated <strong>and</strong> used as primary<br />

ingredients in food seasonings <strong>and</strong> spices (American Spice<br />

Trade Association, 1993; Fenwick <strong>and</strong> Hanley, 1990). <strong>Dehydrator</strong><br />

onion cultivars with ≥18% bulb dry weight (solids) content are<br />

distinct from fresh market types, with ≈5% to 9% bulb solids, <strong>and</strong><br />

storage types, with ≈8% to 12% bulb solids (Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Steer,<br />

1990). <strong>Onion</strong> solids increase from inner to outer scales, <strong>and</strong> from the<br />

base to the apex of onion bulbs <strong>and</strong> plants (Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Henry,<br />

1978). <strong>Onion</strong> water <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrate (WSC), or nonstructural<br />

carbohydrate, forms 80% to 87% of bulb dry weight, <strong>and</strong> is<br />

comprised of glucose, fructose, sucrose, <strong>and</strong> fructans. <strong>Onion</strong> fructans<br />

are fructose polysaccharides (oligosaccharides), with degree of<br />

polymerization (DP) from 3 to 15 subunits, depending on population<br />

(Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Henry, 1979; Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Steer, 1990;<br />

Suzuki <strong>and</strong> Cutcliffe, 1989). Other Allium species can accumulate<br />

fructans with DP > 15 (Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Henry, 1981). The most basic<br />

fructans are DP3 trisaccharides, synthesized by transfer of a fructose<br />

molecule to sucrose, to form two isomers: 1 F -fructosylsucrose <strong>and</strong><br />

6 G -fructosylsucrose. Longer DP fructans form by addition of fructose<br />

subunits to ≥DP3 fructan (Endleman <strong>and</strong> Jefford, 1968; Henry<br />

<strong>and</strong> Darbyshire, 1979). However, Cairns (1993) states that previous<br />

reports on fructan synthesis require reappraisal, <strong>and</strong> that fructan<br />

synthesis enzyme chemistry is still poorly understood.<br />

<strong>Onion</strong> dry weight content is usually measured indirectly by using<br />

a refractometer to assay for <strong>soluble</strong> solids content (SSC) in onion<br />

juice (Dowker, 1990; Pike, 1986). Sinclair et al. (1995) report a 0.99<br />

correlation between refractometer SSC readings <strong>and</strong> actual dry<br />

Received for publication 17 Sept. 1998. Accepted for publication 17 Aug. 1999.<br />

We thank Cindy Waddell for support in the HPLC analysis, Jose Luis Mendoza,<br />

Helen Redden, Melodie Borden, <strong>and</strong> M.R. Doyle for research assistance, <strong>and</strong><br />

Gilroy Foods, Inc. for providing commercial dehydrator onion seed used in this<br />

study. The research was supported by the New Mexico Agricultural Experiment<br />

Station, The New Mexico Dry <strong>Onion</strong> Commission, <strong>and</strong> the Jose Fern<strong>and</strong>ez Chair<br />

for Crop Production.The cost of publishing this paper was defrayed in part by the<br />

payment of page charges. Under postal regulations, this paper therefore must be<br />

hereby marked advertisement solely to indicate this fact.<br />

1 Graduate research assistant.<br />

2 Associate professor.<br />

3 Professor emeritus <strong>and</strong> Jose Fern<strong>and</strong>ez chair for crop production.<br />

J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 124(6):581–586. 1999.<br />

weight content in a study of 49 diverse onion cultivars. Several other<br />

studies also have proven that SSC is an effective selection criterion<br />

for dry weight content (Mann <strong>and</strong> Hoyle, 1945; Nieuwhof et al.,<br />

1973). <strong>Bulb</strong> SSC directly indicates dry weight content, but does not<br />

indicate profiles of constituent WSC. Nondestructive gravimetric methods<br />

<strong>and</strong> near-infrared spectrophotometry also can be used to test for SSC<br />

or dry weight in onions (Birth <strong>and</strong> Dull, 1985; Kehr, 1952).<br />

The present work was conducted to characterize the accumulation<br />

of dehydrator onion bulb fresh <strong>and</strong> dry weight before maturity,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the retention of bulb fresh <strong>and</strong> dry weight after maturity, by<br />

onion populations differing in dry matter percentage (SSC). Postmaturity<br />

treatments were included to study these traits in onions<br />

during periods when harvest was delayed past maturity, <strong>and</strong> during<br />

summer bulb dormancy. Ratios <strong>and</strong> proportions (profiles) of constituent<br />

WSC were determined in a commercial cultivar <strong>and</strong> a<br />

breeding population before <strong>and</strong> after maturity using high-performance<br />

liquid chromatography (HPLC), to gain a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of WSC metabolism in dehydrator onion bulbs. The relative<br />

differences in WSC profiles over various maturities may serve as<br />

phenotypic markers for onion breeding <strong>and</strong> physiology research.<br />

The contribution of leaves <strong>and</strong> pseudostem to dry matter partitioning<br />

was studied in a high solids onion cultivar to observe weight<br />

accumulation <strong>and</strong> translocation during the bulb-fill period. Previous<br />

research has described onion bulb weight characteristics <strong>and</strong> WSC<br />

at maturity in cultivars that differ in dry matter percentage (Darbyshire<br />

<strong>and</strong> Henry, 1978, 1979; Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Steer, 1990). However,<br />

presently there are no reports on dehydrator onion bulb carbohydrate<br />

<strong>and</strong> dry matter accumulation before maturity, or retention in<br />

bulbs that remain rooted in situ after maturity. Additionally, the<br />

HPLC method used in this study is a new modified procedure that<br />

provides relatively efficient qualitative analysis of onion WSC,<br />

which could be especially useful for onion breeding <strong>and</strong> processing<br />

quality control programs.<br />

Materials <strong>and</strong> Methods<br />

POPULATIONS. Two intermediate-day dehydrator onion cultivars<br />

‘GS02’ <strong>and</strong> ‘GS04’, <strong>and</strong> an intermediate-day open-pollinated N.M.<br />

581


State Univ. breeding line, ‘NM9335’, were chosen for this study.<br />

The GS02 <strong>and</strong> GS04 cultivars are proprietary cultivars that are used<br />

in commercial dehydrator onion production in California. The<br />

NM9335 dehydrator onion breeding population was an openpollinated<br />

F7 generation that originated from the cross of ‘Ben<br />

Shemen’ x ‘Southport White Globe’ <strong>and</strong> had one previous selection<br />

cycle for SSC. The NM9335 population was well adapted to the<br />

experimental location, which was indicated by vigorous growth,<br />

large bulbs, <strong>and</strong> disease resistance. The GS02 <strong>and</strong> GS04 cultivars<br />

had relatively small bulbs that had more symptoms of pink root<br />

(Phoma terrestris Hansen) <strong>and</strong> fusarium basal rot [Fusarium<br />

oxysporum f. sp. cepae (Hans) Snyder <strong>and</strong> Hansen], relative to<br />

NM9335.<br />

FIELD EXPERIMENTS. Experiments were conducted in 1994 <strong>and</strong><br />

1995, <strong>and</strong> were located at the Fabian Garcia Agricultural Science<br />

Center in Las Cruces, N.M. A split-plot experimental design with<br />

six replications was used for bulb characteristic studies before <strong>and</strong><br />

after maturity. <strong>Onion</strong> populations were planted in rows to form main<br />

plots, <strong>and</strong> maturity treatments were applied as subplots within rows.<br />

A r<strong>and</strong>omized complete block design with six replications was used<br />

for plant-weight partitioning studies of the GS04 cultivar. Plots were<br />

established 1.1 m long, with a 1-m row spacing, <strong>and</strong> with four<br />

equally spaced lines of plants direct-seeded in a 76-cm-wide bed on<br />

26 Jan., both years. Seedlings were h<strong>and</strong> thinned to 6 cm between<br />

plants at four weeks after emergence. The crop was managed<br />

according to st<strong>and</strong>ard practices for southern New Mexico, with<br />

water <strong>and</strong> nitrogen applied using drip irrigation (Bailey <strong>and</strong> Corgan,<br />

1986; Corgan <strong>and</strong> Kedar, 1990). Plots were considered mature when<br />

≈80% of the tops had fallen. Predicted <strong>and</strong> actual maturity closely<br />

coincided both years. The NM9335 population matured on 15 July<br />

1994 <strong>and</strong> 10 July 1995. The GS02 cultivar matured on 13 July 1994<br />

<strong>and</strong> on 7 July 1995, <strong>and</strong> the GS04 cultivar matured on 7 July 1994<br />

<strong>and</strong> on 20 July 1995. <strong>Onion</strong> bulbs were h<strong>and</strong> harvested from within<br />

the middle 0.9 m of the plot. <strong>Onion</strong> roots <strong>and</strong> tops were clipped at<br />

harvest, diseased bulbs were discarded, <strong>and</strong> harvested bulbs were<br />

stored temporarily in paper bags at ambient air temperature (≈25<br />

°C). <strong>Bulb</strong>s were left rooted in place with tops attached, for postmaturity<br />

harvest treatments. During 1994, treatments were designed to<br />

harvest plots at 45, 30, <strong>and</strong> 15 d before maturity, at maturity, <strong>and</strong> at<br />

15, 30, <strong>and</strong> 45 d after maturity. The 45 d treatments were omitted<br />

from the 1995 experiments.<br />

On the day of harvest, <strong>and</strong> just before testing, bulbs were washed<br />

<strong>and</strong> dried to remove soil <strong>and</strong> dry scales, top <strong>and</strong> root stubble were<br />

removed, <strong>and</strong> fresh yield data was obtained from these samples.<br />

Samples of GS04 plants were prepared for weight partitioning<br />

studies by cutting 10 plants from each replication into leaves,<br />

pseudostems, <strong>and</strong> bulbs. Percent dry weight was determined by<br />

h<strong>and</strong> chopping the 10-bulb subsample <strong>and</strong> the plant parts into coarse<br />

pieces (≈2 to 3 cm), which were then dried at 100 °C for 1 h, <strong>and</strong> then<br />

at 70 to 75 °C for 48 h, in a forced air convection oven. Dried samples<br />

were frozen at –10 °C subsequent to WSC analysis using HPLC.<br />

Average bulb fresh weight was calculated by dividing plot fresh<br />

yield by the number of bulbs per plots. Average bulb dry weight was<br />

calculated by multiplying average bulb fresh weight by average bulb<br />

percent dry weight.<br />

WATER-SOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS. HPLC analysis was<br />

conducted according to the modified methods of Suzuki <strong>and</strong> Cutcliffe<br />

(1989) <strong>and</strong> Scobell et al. (1977), <strong>and</strong> four replications of each field<br />

treatment were analyzed. Dried bulb samples were further prepared<br />

by chopping <strong>and</strong> mixing in a food processor, <strong>and</strong> then 20 to 30 g of<br />

these flakes were ground into powder to pass through an 80 mesh<br />

screen. Powder was mixed with triple distilled water (1 g/100 mL)<br />

<strong>and</strong> shaken for 1 h at 25 °C. Solutions were vacuum filtered through<br />

#40 filter paper, <strong>and</strong> then refiltered into HPLC vials through a 45 μm<br />

membrane filter disc. The vials were sealed <strong>and</strong> then immediately<br />

stored at –10 °C before HPLC analysis.<br />

<strong>Carbohydrates</strong> were analyzed by injecting 20 μL of sample<br />

solution into a Hewlett-Packard 1090 series liquid chromatograph<br />

with deionized, distilled, degassed water as the mobile phase, <strong>and</strong> an<br />

ion moderated partition column (Bio-Rad Aminex HPX-42A, Hercules,<br />

Calif.) as the stationary phase, followed by a Hewlett Packard<br />

1047A refractive index detector. A flow rate of 0.6 mL·min –1 <strong>and</strong> a<br />

column temperature of 85 °C were used.<br />

Glucose, fructose, <strong>and</strong> sucrose st<strong>and</strong>ard sugars were used to<br />

calculate column retention times for these onion WSC. Highfructose<br />

corn syrup oligosaccharide st<strong>and</strong>ards indicated the column<br />

was detecting polysaccharides in sequential rank of degree of<br />

polymerization (DP), which infers that onion fructans also elute in<br />

sequential rank of DP. Quantitative analysis of onion WSC was not<br />

possible because fructan st<strong>and</strong>ards were not available. Previous<br />

research on onion WSC confirms that glucose, fructose, sucrose <strong>and</strong><br />

fructans are the only constituent WSC carbohydrates found in<br />

Allium cepa L., <strong>and</strong> that fructans elute in sequence, based on rank of<br />

fructan DP (Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Henry, 1978, 1979). Based on these<br />

assumptions, relative amounts of WSC were estimated from peak<br />

Fig. 1. <strong>Bulb</strong> weight characteristics of three dehydrator onion populations before <strong>and</strong><br />

after maturity, averaged over 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995.<br />

582 J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 124(6):581–586. 1999.<br />

weight


areas of chromatograms, <strong>and</strong> WSC identification was based on<br />

column retention time.<br />

Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

Analysis of variance <strong>and</strong> homogeneity of variance tests indicated<br />

that data should be combined <strong>and</strong> averaged for 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995.<br />

BULB WEIGHT CHARACTERISTICS BEFORE AND AFTER MATURITY.<br />

NM9335 bulbs accumulated fresh weight at a faster rate before<br />

maturity than bulbs of GS02 <strong>and</strong> GS04. NM9335 bulb fresh weight<br />

was much higher than GS04 <strong>and</strong> GS02 bulbs at maturity. However,<br />

because NM9335 had lower bulb percent dry weight than GS02 or<br />

GS04, all populations accumulated similar amounts of bulb dry<br />

weight (Fig. 1). <strong>Bulb</strong> fresh weight remained about the same after<br />

maturity for each population, although bulbs of GS04 lost fresh<br />

weight 30 d after maturity (Fig. 1). NM9335 bulb fresh weight<br />

increased ≈8% at 15 d after maturity, which may indicate that the<br />

harvest rating of ≈80% tops fallen was premature for this population<br />

(Fig. 1).<br />

Percent dry weight of NM9335 bulbs was constant, <strong>and</strong> GS02<br />

<strong>and</strong> GS04 percent dry weight increased before maturity (Fig. 1),<br />

which indicates that bulb percent dry weight before maturity did not<br />

indicate percent dry weight at maturity in the high-solids dehydrator<br />

onion cultivars. Lancaster <strong>and</strong> Kelly (1984) studied percent dry<br />

weight in bulbs of ‘Southport White Globe’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Spartan Sleeper’,<br />

with ≈13% bulb dry weight, <strong>and</strong> reported that percent dry weight<br />

before maturity accurately predicted percent dry weight at maturity,<br />

by testing the third inner scale. Their study was not replicated, <strong>and</strong><br />

Fig. 2. High-performance liquid chromatogram of <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrates for a 10bulb<br />

sample of dehydrator onion breeding population NM9335 at maturity in<br />

1994. DP denotes the degree of polymerization of fructan polysaccharide.<br />

J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 124(6):581–586. 1999.<br />

data were reported based on single bulb samples, so their results<br />

were more likely a reflection of variability for bulb percent dry<br />

weight within the study populations rather than an effect of bulb<br />

maturity on percent dry weight.<br />

At maturity, bulbs of NM9335, GS02 <strong>and</strong> GS04 had 11.9% ±<br />

0.33%, 18.6% ± 0.27% <strong>and</strong> 19.4% ± 0.40% dry weight, respectively.<br />

<strong>Bulb</strong> percent dry weight decreased 0.5% to 1% at 30 d after<br />

maturity for each population (Fig. 1). <strong>Bulb</strong> percent dry weight losses<br />

could perhaps be due to carbohydrate respiration, balanced by<br />

increases in percent dry weight due to bulb desiccation.<br />

ONION WATER SOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES BEFORE AND AFTER MA-<br />

TURITY. Profiles of WSC were distinctly different between the<br />

intermediate-solids NM9335 breeding population (Fig. 2) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

high-solids GS04 commercial cultivar (Fig. 3). Differences between<br />

the higher DP fructans were not resolvable because of<br />

coelution at the same column retention time, which was indicated by<br />

chromatograms with an indistinct secondary peak preceding the<br />

main peak of the highest DP fructan (Figs. 2 <strong>and</strong> 3).<br />

At each maturity, GSO4 had a much larger proportion of bulb dry<br />

weight in WSC, relative to NM9335, <strong>and</strong> most of the WSC was<br />

≥DP6 fructan (Figs. 4 <strong>and</strong> 5). Fructose, glucose <strong>and</strong> sucrose were<br />

relatively low in GS04, <strong>and</strong> were relatively high in NM9335, which<br />

concurs with results of Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Henry (1979), who also<br />

studied WSC of intermediate- <strong>and</strong> high-solids onion populations.<br />

Fructose <strong>and</strong> sucrose levels were variable across all maturity dates<br />

in GS04 bulbs, whereas, glucose levels decreased approaching<br />

maturity, <strong>and</strong> then increased slightly after maturity (Fig. 4). Propor-<br />

Fig. 3. High-performance liquid chromatogram of <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrates for a 10bulb<br />

sample of commercial dehydrator onion cultivar GS04 at maturity in 1994.<br />

DP denotes the degree of polymerization of fructan polysaccharide.<br />

583


Fig. 4. Proportions of <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrates from bulbs of commercial dehydrator<br />

onion cultivar GS04 before <strong>and</strong> after maturity, averaged over 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995. Data<br />

for the 45 d postmaturity treatment is from 1994 only.<br />

Fig. 6. Proportions of <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrates from leaves of commercial dehydrator<br />

onion cultivar GS04 before maturity, averaged over 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995. Data for the<br />

–45 d prematurity treatment is from 1994 only.<br />

Fig. 5. Proportions of <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrates from bulbs of dehydrator onion<br />

breeding line NM9335 before <strong>and</strong> after maturity, averaged over 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995.<br />

Data for the 45 d postmaturity treatment is from 1994 only.<br />

Fig. 7. Proportions of <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrates from pseudostems of commercial<br />

dehydrator onion cultivar GS04 before maturity, averaged over 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995.<br />

Data for the –45 d prematurity treatment is from 1994 only.<br />

584 J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 124(6):581–586. 1999.


tions of DP3, DP4, <strong>and</strong> DP5 fructan were generally consistent<br />

before <strong>and</strong> after maturity, whereas most WSC accumulated as ≥DP6<br />

fructan before maturity in GS04 bulbs. Fructan ≥DP6 was measured<br />

at various levels after maturity in GS04 bulbs (Fig. 4). Mean<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard errors of ≥DP6 fructan in GS04 bulbs were high. This may<br />

have been due to environmental variability, because laboratory<br />

replications were derived from replicated field plots. Also, sample<br />

variability would likely have been improved if the entire 10 bulb<br />

subsample from each replication had been ground to pass an 80<br />

mesh screen.<br />

Proportions of fructose, glucose <strong>and</strong> sucrose were variable in<br />

NM9335 bulbs across maturity treatments (Fig. 5). Fructan levels<br />

increased in order from DP3 to DP6 in GS04 bulbs (Fig. 4), but<br />

decreased in order from DP6 to DP4 in NM9335 (Fig. 5), before <strong>and</strong><br />

after maturity. This indicates that GSO4 accumulated more high-DP<br />

fructan, <strong>and</strong> NM9335 more short-DP fructan. These differences in<br />

WSC profiles provide interesting contrasts for further research on<br />

fructan synthesis <strong>and</strong> carbohydrate biochemistry, especially for the<br />

enzyme fructose–fructosyltransferase (polymerase) that is reported<br />

to control the DP of fructan molecules (Cairns, 1993; Henry <strong>and</strong><br />

Darbyshire, 1978, 1979). Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Henry (1979) also reported<br />

that high-solids onion WSC was mostly in the form of higher<br />

DP fructan, <strong>and</strong> with relatively low amounts of glucose, fructose <strong>and</strong><br />

sucrose.<br />

Differences between populations for WSC profile lead to relevant<br />

questions for onion breeders. Breeding populations under<br />

development for dehydrator characteristics are often screened for<br />

bulb percent dry weight directly by dehydration, or indirectly by<br />

using a refractometer to test for <strong>soluble</strong> solids in onion juice<br />

(Dowker, 1990; Pike, 1986). Refractometer data can have up to a<br />

0.99 correlation with dry weight (Sinclair, 1995), but do not reflect<br />

proportions of constituent WSC. <strong>Dehydrator</strong> onion cultivars with<br />

(%)<br />

Fig. 8. Proportions of plant fresh weight in bulbs, pseudostems, <strong>and</strong> leaves of<br />

commercial dehydrator onion cultivar GS04 before maturity, averaged over 1994<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1995. Data is expressed as percent of total plant weight. Data for the –45 d<br />

prematurity treatment is from 1994 only.<br />

J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 124(6):581–586. 1999.<br />

high bulb solids may possess better processing characteristics, such<br />

as whiter color after drying, better organoleptic properties, or better<br />

milling qualities, relative to onion populations with lower bulb<br />

solids, which also are relatively lower in fructan <strong>and</strong> higher in<br />

sucrose, fructose <strong>and</strong> glucose. Simple sugars (mono- <strong>and</strong> disaccharides)<br />

in onions may lead to greater browning, or caramelization<br />

reactions, during the dehydration process. In these studies GS02 <strong>and</strong><br />

GS04 bulbs with ≈18.5% to 19.5% solids dried with a whiter color<br />

than bulbs of the ≈12% solids, NM9335, under similar drying<br />

conditions, based on subjective observation. NM9335 bulbs were<br />

relatively low in fructan <strong>and</strong> high in the sugars, fructose, glucose <strong>and</strong><br />

sucrose, compared to GS04 bulbs. Presently, there are no reports on<br />

how recurrent selection for bulb dry weight or SSC will affect WSC<br />

profiles, or if recurrent selection will increase fructan content,<br />

without a proportional increase in fructose, glucose <strong>and</strong> sucrose.<br />

WATER SOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATE CHARACTERISTICS OF GS04 BULBS,<br />

LEAVES, AND PSEUDOSTEMS BEFORE MATURITY. <strong>Water</strong> <strong>soluble</strong> carbohydrate<br />

increased from the base to the top of GS04 plants before<br />

maturity, which agrees with the report of Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Henry<br />

(1978). Very small amounts of DP3 to DP5 fructan were detected in<br />

GS04 pseudostems, <strong>and</strong> trace amounts were found in leaves before<br />

maturity (Figs. 6 <strong>and</strong> 7). Leaf <strong>and</strong> pseudostem WSC were mostly<br />

simple sugars, which decreased as the proportion of dry weight<br />

before maturity (Figs. 6 <strong>and</strong> 7). Pseudostem WSC increased from 45<br />

to 30 d before maturity, <strong>and</strong> then declined from 30 d before maturity<br />

to maturity (Fig. 7). The study period coincided with the last six<br />

weeks of bulb development, as onion plants translocate photosynthetic<br />

carbon to bulbs before bulb summer dormancy.<br />

Darbyshire <strong>and</strong> Steer (1990) also reported that levels of sugar in<br />

leaves, pseudostems, <strong>and</strong> bulbs increase with age until the final<br />

stages of bulb development. Darbyshire et al. (1979) reported that<br />

fructose levels in leaves <strong>and</strong> pseudostems were generally higher<br />

than glucose or sucrose, but diurnal fluctuation affected the amount<br />

(%)<br />

Fig. 9. Proportions of plant dry weight in bulbs, pseudostems, <strong>and</strong> leaves of<br />

commercial dehydrator onion cultivar GS04 before maturity, averaged over 1994<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1995. Data is expressed as percent of total plant weight. Data for the –45 d<br />

prematurity treatment is from 1994 only.<br />

585


<strong>and</strong> types of sugars in onion leaves <strong>and</strong> pseudostems. Several studies<br />

have shown that fructan accumulation in leaf bases of young plants<br />

coincides with initiation of bulbing in onions (Darbyshire <strong>and</strong><br />

Henry, 1978; Henry <strong>and</strong> Darbyshire, 1978). Changes in WSC<br />

composition in leaves <strong>and</strong> pseudostems may coincide with the<br />

cessation of new leaf emergence, which denotes the end of vegetative<br />

growth <strong>and</strong> acceleration of active bulb enlargement in onions<br />

(Brewster, 1990).<br />

WEIGHT PARTITIONING IN GS04 PLANTS BEFORE MATURITY. GS04<br />

bulb weight increased, <strong>and</strong> pseudostem <strong>and</strong> leaf weight decreased<br />

before maturity (Figs. 8 <strong>and</strong> 9). The proportion of whole plant dry<br />

weight in bulbs increased from 31.8 ± 0.01 to 76.5 ± 0.01% in the<br />

45 d period before maturity, demonstrating that the GS04 dehydrator<br />

onion cultivar was very efficient at converting plant dry weight<br />

into net yield, which is commonly expressed as the crop harvest<br />

index.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The commercial dehydrator cultivars <strong>and</strong> the breeding population<br />

had distinctly different bulb weight <strong>and</strong> WSC characteristics.<br />

<strong>Bulb</strong> traits <strong>and</strong> WSC profiles of the commercial cultivars provide<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards for progress in the breeding population. The HPLC<br />

method is useful to evaluate potential parents for a breeding program,<br />

to typify breeding populations, <strong>and</strong> to evaluate progress in<br />

selecting for WSC content. The method ideally would be improved<br />

to resolve differences between higher DP fructans, to reduce sample<br />

variability, <strong>and</strong> to develop fructan st<strong>and</strong>ards to quantify onion WSC.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

American Spice Trade Association. 1993. Proc. 5th Annu. Spice Tech.<br />

Forum. Amer. Spice Trade Assn., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.<br />

Bailey, A.L. <strong>and</strong> J.N. Corgan. 1986. Growing onions in New Mexico. N.M.<br />

State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Circ. 524.<br />

Birth, G.S. <strong>and</strong> G.G. Dull. 1985. Nondestructive spectrophotometric<br />

determination of dry matter in onions. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:297–<br />

303.<br />

Brewster, J.L. 1990. Physiology of crop growth <strong>and</strong> bulbing, p. 53–88. In:<br />

J.L. Brewster <strong>and</strong> H.D. Rabinowitch (eds.). <strong>Onion</strong>s <strong>and</strong> allied crops. vol.<br />

1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.<br />

Cairns, A.J. 1993. Evidence for the de novo synthesis of fructan by enzymes<br />

from higher plants: a reappraisal of the SST/FFT model. New Phytol.<br />

123:15–24.<br />

Corgan, J.N. <strong>and</strong> N. Kedar. 1990. <strong>Onion</strong> cultivation in subtropical climates,<br />

p. 31–48. In: J.L. Brewster <strong>and</strong> H.D. Rabinowitch (eds.). <strong>Onion</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

allied crops. vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.<br />

Darbyshire, B. <strong>and</strong> R.J. Henry. 1978. The distribution of fructan in onions.<br />

New Phytol. 81:29–34.<br />

Darbyshire, B. <strong>and</strong> R.J. Henry. 1979. The association of fructan with high<br />

percentage dry weight in onion cultivars suitable for dehydrating. J. Sci.<br />

Food Agr. 30:1035–1038.<br />

Darbyshire, B. <strong>and</strong> R.J. Henry. 1981. Differences in fructan content <strong>and</strong><br />

synthesis in some Allium species. New Phytol. 87:249–256.<br />

Darbyshire, B., R.J. Henry, F.M. Melhuish, <strong>and</strong> R.K Hewett. 1979. Diurnal<br />

variations in nonstructural carbohydrates, leaf extension, <strong>and</strong> leaf cavity<br />

carbon dioxide concentrations in Allium cepa L. J. Expt. Bot. 30:109–<br />

115.<br />

Darbyshire, B. <strong>and</strong> B.T. Steer. 1990. Carbohydrate biochemistry, p. 1–16.<br />

In: J.L. Brewster <strong>and</strong> H.D. Rabinowitch (eds.). <strong>Onion</strong>s <strong>and</strong> allied crops.<br />

vol. 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.<br />

Dowker, B.D. 1990. <strong>Onion</strong> breeding, p. 215–232. In: J.L. Brewster <strong>and</strong><br />

H.D. Rabinowitch (eds.). <strong>Onion</strong>s <strong>and</strong> allied crops. vol. 1. CRC Press,<br />

Boca Raton, Fla.<br />

Endleman, J. <strong>and</strong> T.G. Jefford. 1968. The mechanism of fructosan metabolism<br />

in higher plants as exemplified in Helianthus tuberosus. New Phytol.<br />

67:517–531.<br />

Fenwick, R.G. <strong>and</strong> A.B. Hanley. 1990. Processing of alliums: use in food<br />

manufacture, p. 73–91. In: J.L. Brewster <strong>and</strong> H.D. Rabinowitch (eds.).<br />

<strong>Onion</strong>s <strong>and</strong> allied crops. vol. 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.<br />

Henry, R.J. <strong>and</strong> B. Darbyshire. 1978. The distribution of fructan metabolizing<br />

enzymes in the onion plant. Plant Sci. Lett. 14:155–158.<br />

Henry, R.J. <strong>and</strong> B. Darbyshire. 1979. Sucrose:sucrose fructosyltransferase<br />

<strong>and</strong> fructan:fructan fructosyltransferase from Allium cepa. Phytochem.<br />

19:1017–1020.<br />

Kehr, A.E. 1952. Soluble solids <strong>and</strong> their determination in onions. Proc.<br />

Assn. S. Agr. Workers 49:110.<br />

Lancaster, J.E. <strong>and</strong> K.E. Kelly. 1984. Dry matter percentage of leaf blades<br />

<strong>and</strong> scales during the growth of onion (Allium cepa L). N.Z. J. Agr. Res.<br />

27:83–87.<br />

Mann, L.K. <strong>and</strong> B.J. Hoyle. 1945. Use of the refractometer for selecting<br />

onion bulbs high in dry matter for breeding. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.<br />

46:285–292.<br />

Nieuwhof, M., J.W. de Bruyn, <strong>and</strong> F. Garretsen. 1973. Methods to<br />

determine solidity <strong>and</strong> dry matter content of onions (Allium cepa L.).<br />

Euphytica 22:39–47.<br />

Pike, L.M. 1986. <strong>Onion</strong> breeding, p. 357–394. In: M.J. Basset (ed.).<br />

Breeding vegetable crops. AVI Publ., Westport, Conn.<br />

Scobell, H.D., K.M. Brobst <strong>and</strong> E.M. Steele. 1977. Automated liquid<br />

chromatographic system for analysis of carbohydrate mixtures. Cereal<br />

Chem. 54:905–917.<br />

Sinclair, P.J., A.B. Blakeney, <strong>and</strong> E.W.R. Barlow. 1995. Relationships<br />

between bulb dry matter content, <strong>soluble</strong> solids concentration <strong>and</strong><br />

nonstructural carbohydrate composition in the onion (Allium cepa). J.<br />

Sci. Food Agr. 69:203–209.<br />

Suzuki, M. <strong>and</strong> J.A. Cutcliffe. 1989. Fructan in onion bulbs in relation to<br />

storage life. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:1327–1333.<br />

586 J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 124(6):581–586. 1999.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!