07.04.2013 Views

foucault-and-the-iranian-revolution-janet-afary

foucault-and-the-iranian-revolution-janet-afary

foucault-and-the-iranian-revolution-janet-afary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 189<br />

is necessarily related to <strong>the</strong> idea of freedom. And this is very good, but <strong>the</strong><br />

philosophy or thinking whose subject matter is not self-consciousness, but<br />

real practice or social practice, relates to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of power. In o<strong>the</strong>r words,<br />

instead of self-consciousness <strong>and</strong> freedom, we reach practice <strong>and</strong> power.<br />

I do not mean to say that power, from my point of view, is a foundational,<br />

unconquerable, absolute entity that one has to kneel before. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> purpose<br />

of all of my analyses is that, in light of <strong>the</strong>m, we find out where are <strong>the</strong><br />

weak points of power, from which we can attack it. When we speak of <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />

between reason <strong>and</strong> madness, when we show that reason exercises<br />

its power on madness, this is not to justify reason. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is to show how<br />

reason as a system of power can be questioned <strong>and</strong> fought against. Thus, my<br />

analyses are in fact strategic analyses <strong>and</strong> are meaningful only in relation to<br />

strategies.<br />

My studies on <strong>the</strong> issues of youth crime <strong>and</strong> prison are of a similar nature.<br />

I want to show what are <strong>the</strong> existing mechanisms of power that separate<br />

<strong>the</strong> criminal from <strong>the</strong> noncriminal. What are <strong>the</strong> points of weakn ess of this<br />

system or <strong>the</strong> historic points in between which <strong>the</strong> system has taken shape,<br />

so that we could objectively <strong>and</strong> practically challenge <strong>the</strong>m? Many regard<br />

structuralism as an analysis of mechanisms that are undefeatable <strong>and</strong> imperishable,<br />

whereas <strong>the</strong> opposite is true. They say that structuralism is about<br />

analyzing relations that are part of <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> objects <strong>and</strong> cannot be<br />

changed. The opposite is true. I want to explain relations that have been tied<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r through <strong>the</strong> power of human beings <strong>and</strong> for this very reason are<br />

changeable <strong>and</strong> destructible. Therefore, from my point of view, structuralism<br />

is more a philosophy or a manual of combat, not a document of impotence.<br />

My problem is not to explore my self-consciousness to see if I am free or not.<br />

My problem is to analyze reality to see how one can free oneself.<br />

The Army-When <strong>the</strong> Earth Quakes<br />

First published in Corriere della sera, September 28, 1978.<br />

Tehran-On <strong>the</strong> edge of <strong>the</strong> two great salt deserts that stretch across <strong>the</strong> middle<br />

of Iran, an earthquake has just occurred. Tabas <strong>and</strong> forty villages have<br />

been annihilated.<br />

Ten years ago to <strong>the</strong> day, Ferdows, in <strong>the</strong> same region, was wiped out.<br />

On this ruined l<strong>and</strong>, two rival towns were born, as if in <strong>the</strong> shah's Iran <strong>the</strong><br />

same misfortune could not give rise to <strong>the</strong> same renewal. On one side, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was <strong>the</strong> town of administration, <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Housing, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> notables.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!