Management of the Hungarian Energy Office - Magyar Energia Hivatal
Management of the Hungarian Energy Office - Magyar Energia Hivatal
Management of the Hungarian Energy Office - Magyar Energia Hivatal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
hungarian energy <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
Trading margin cap and incentives <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> supply<br />
HEO is obliged to conduct an inspection on <strong>the</strong> capped<br />
trading margin <strong>of</strong> universal service suppliers till 31 March <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> year subsequent to year under review. In <strong>the</strong> inspection,<br />
HEO found that each universal service suppliers had an extra<br />
trading margin in 2008 to be reimbursed to customers. HEO<br />
provided in resolutions on <strong>the</strong> measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount to be<br />
reimbursed and on <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> reimbursement.<br />
HEO has to complete <strong>the</strong> inspection <strong>of</strong> trading margins with<br />
regard to <strong>the</strong> year 2009 until 31 March 2010.<br />
With introducing an income levelling mechanism for disributors<br />
in August 2006, <strong>the</strong>re was no reason any more to maintain<br />
<strong>the</strong> instrument <strong>of</strong> distributors’ pr<strong>of</strong>i t cap. Since <strong>the</strong> new price<br />
regulation cycle, <strong>the</strong> income levelling mechanism will serve<br />
as a tool also for <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> a scheme <strong>of</strong> incentives on<br />
service quality for distributors. The new elements <strong>of</strong> this<br />
scheme were disclosed in <strong>the</strong> already mentioned methodolgy<br />
guideline on price regulation <strong>of</strong> system use charges (published<br />
on 31 October 2008). In line with this guideline, indices <strong>of</strong><br />
service quality affect <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infl ation correction<br />
factor to be taken into account in annual price adjustment.<br />
Distributors who achieve better service quality indices while<br />
distribution charges are uniform nationwide, gain extra money<br />
through <strong>the</strong> income levelling mechanism to <strong>the</strong> detriment <strong>of</strong><br />
distributors achieving worse indices. HEO, after availing and<br />
processing <strong>the</strong> data, can complete <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> service<br />
quality indices <strong>of</strong> 2009 by late Spring in 2010, <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
effect will be refl ected in <strong>the</strong> administrative prices <strong>of</strong> 2011.<br />
In addition to <strong>the</strong> above, on HEO’s proposal, <strong>the</strong> regulation<br />
on <strong>the</strong> sanctioning <strong>of</strong> worsening service quality indices <strong>of</strong><br />
distributors was included again in <strong>the</strong> Decree on <strong>the</strong> setting <strong>of</strong><br />
charges for system use [GKM Decree 119/2007 (29.12)]. In<br />
line with this provision, if <strong>the</strong> service quality indices specifi ed<br />
in a HEO resolution worsen, <strong>the</strong> distributor must give a price<br />
discount <strong>of</strong> 1-3% to <strong>the</strong> customers from its distribution charges<br />
in <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent year.<br />
HEO is examining <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> this<br />
scheme <strong>of</strong> incentives on service quality also to <strong>the</strong> transmission<br />
system operator.<br />
PUBLIC SERVICE OBLIGATION AND CONSUMER<br />
PROTECTION<br />
Approval <strong>of</strong> Codes<br />
The Electricity Act and its enforcement decree were<br />
modifi ed several times in 2009. These changes required a<br />
continuous adjustment <strong>of</strong> licensees’ Business Conduct Rules<br />
to <strong>the</strong> effective statutory provisions. After comprehensive<br />
discussions in more rounds, provisions serving <strong>the</strong> protection<br />
<strong>of</strong> users have become more stressed in <strong>the</strong> modifi ed Business<br />
Conduct Rules. HEO did not issue any resolutions on<br />
<strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> Business Conduct Rules, but issued seven<br />
resolutions on <strong>the</strong> modifi cation <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> in 2009.<br />
annual report 2009 | 26<br />
Service quality<br />
The minimum quality requirements concerning individual<br />
consumers are prepared on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annual data supply<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>of</strong> Guaranteed Services and <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
licensees’ activity in <strong>the</strong> previous year was completed in June<br />
2009, and can be seen also on <strong>the</strong> webpage <strong>of</strong> HEO. In 2009,<br />
also <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>of</strong> Guaranteed Services itself was modifi ed<br />
in accordance with <strong>the</strong> new regulation and also in line with <strong>the</strong><br />
activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution licensees, and also with <strong>the</strong> activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> universal service licensees operating within a new legal<br />
framework. The resolution on Guaranteed Services imposed<br />
<strong>the</strong> obligation <strong>of</strong> automatic penalty payment with regard<br />
to 10 <strong>of</strong> 13 minimum quality requirements on distribution<br />
licensees, 4 <strong>of</strong> 5 minimum requirements on universal service<br />
suppliers and 3 <strong>of</strong> 4 minimum requirements on trade licensees.<br />
Aggregate fi gures on Guaranteed Services are shown in Table<br />
7.<br />
In 2009, HEO, following a discussion that took for several<br />
months, made a detailed regulation on <strong>the</strong> requirement<br />
II <strong>of</strong> Guaranteed Services for distribution licensees, <strong>the</strong><br />
’restoration <strong>of</strong> interruption <strong>of</strong> electricity supply affecting<br />
several consumption places’ taking into account <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong><br />
extreme wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions ’accompanied by a disturbance<br />
occuring on <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> extreme wear and tear beyond design<br />
conditions’. It was required particularly by <strong>the</strong> failure<br />
between 27 January and 2 February and <strong>the</strong> growing number<br />
<strong>of</strong> requests on exemption due to <strong>the</strong> increasing number <strong>of</strong><br />
failures. The modifi cation affected <strong>the</strong> procedure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
qualifi cation <strong>of</strong> extraordinary events and <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> supply. It is now <strong>the</strong> licensees’s responsibility<br />
to qualify instead <strong>of</strong> an independent organisation, however, if<br />
<strong>the</strong> distribution licensee fails to observe <strong>the</strong> deadline for <strong>the</strong><br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> breakdown, it will pay a penalty to <strong>the</strong> affected<br />
user. Users are entitled for a repeated penalty for each fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
12-hour outage after <strong>the</strong> deadline <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> breakdown<br />
expires. This is a tool for HEO to motivate distributors to<br />
accelerate <strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> breakdowns. Penalty payment<br />
will be automatic from 2011 taking into account <strong>the</strong> time<br />
required for <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IT systems <strong>of</strong> distribution<br />
licensees. Prior to than, penalty is paid based on <strong>the</strong> users’<br />
claim.<br />
In 2009, HEO investigated whe<strong>the</strong>r distribution licensees<br />
observed <strong>the</strong> provisions specifi ed in <strong>the</strong> resolutions on<br />
Guaranteed Services to be provided by distribution licensees,<br />
paid <strong>the</strong> penalties to be paid automatically and managed<br />
properly <strong>the</strong> rides <strong>of</strong> forestry. HEO stated that licensees’ data<br />
registry is suitable to fulfi l <strong>the</strong> Guaranteed Services, and <strong>the</strong><br />
order <strong>of</strong> procedure <strong>of</strong> rider management is suitable for <strong>the</strong><br />
secure operation <strong>of</strong> networks.<br />
From among distribution licensees, DÉMÁSZ Hálózati Elosztó<br />
Kft. paid penalty in each failed case in 2008. (Ratio<br />
<strong>of</strong> fulfi lling penalty payments: 100%). The ratio <strong>of</strong> fulfi lling<br />
penalty payments in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r four licensees<br />
varied between 3.5% and 0.4%. From among universal service<br />
licensee, it was DÉMÁSZ Nyrt. again that achieved <strong>the</strong><br />
highest ratio <strong>of</strong> penalty payments (35%), while this ratio was