07.04.2013 Views

Management of the Hungarian Energy Office - Magyar Energia Hivatal

Management of the Hungarian Energy Office - Magyar Energia Hivatal

Management of the Hungarian Energy Office - Magyar Energia Hivatal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hungarian energy <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

Trading margin cap and incentives <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> supply<br />

HEO is obliged to conduct an inspection on <strong>the</strong> capped<br />

trading margin <strong>of</strong> universal service suppliers till 31 March <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> year subsequent to year under review. In <strong>the</strong> inspection,<br />

HEO found that each universal service suppliers had an extra<br />

trading margin in 2008 to be reimbursed to customers. HEO<br />

provided in resolutions on <strong>the</strong> measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount to be<br />

reimbursed and on <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> reimbursement.<br />

HEO has to complete <strong>the</strong> inspection <strong>of</strong> trading margins with<br />

regard to <strong>the</strong> year 2009 until 31 March 2010.<br />

With introducing an income levelling mechanism for disributors<br />

in August 2006, <strong>the</strong>re was no reason any more to maintain<br />

<strong>the</strong> instrument <strong>of</strong> distributors’ pr<strong>of</strong>i t cap. Since <strong>the</strong> new price<br />

regulation cycle, <strong>the</strong> income levelling mechanism will serve<br />

as a tool also for <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> a scheme <strong>of</strong> incentives on<br />

service quality for distributors. The new elements <strong>of</strong> this<br />

scheme were disclosed in <strong>the</strong> already mentioned methodolgy<br />

guideline on price regulation <strong>of</strong> system use charges (published<br />

on 31 October 2008). In line with this guideline, indices <strong>of</strong><br />

service quality affect <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> infl ation correction<br />

factor to be taken into account in annual price adjustment.<br />

Distributors who achieve better service quality indices while<br />

distribution charges are uniform nationwide, gain extra money<br />

through <strong>the</strong> income levelling mechanism to <strong>the</strong> detriment <strong>of</strong><br />

distributors achieving worse indices. HEO, after availing and<br />

processing <strong>the</strong> data, can complete <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> service<br />

quality indices <strong>of</strong> 2009 by late Spring in 2010, <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

effect will be refl ected in <strong>the</strong> administrative prices <strong>of</strong> 2011.<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> above, on HEO’s proposal, <strong>the</strong> regulation<br />

on <strong>the</strong> sanctioning <strong>of</strong> worsening service quality indices <strong>of</strong><br />

distributors was included again in <strong>the</strong> Decree on <strong>the</strong> setting <strong>of</strong><br />

charges for system use [GKM Decree 119/2007 (29.12)]. In<br />

line with this provision, if <strong>the</strong> service quality indices specifi ed<br />

in a HEO resolution worsen, <strong>the</strong> distributor must give a price<br />

discount <strong>of</strong> 1-3% to <strong>the</strong> customers from its distribution charges<br />

in <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent year.<br />

HEO is examining <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> this<br />

scheme <strong>of</strong> incentives on service quality also to <strong>the</strong> transmission<br />

system operator.<br />

PUBLIC SERVICE OBLIGATION AND CONSUMER<br />

PROTECTION<br />

Approval <strong>of</strong> Codes<br />

The Electricity Act and its enforcement decree were<br />

modifi ed several times in 2009. These changes required a<br />

continuous adjustment <strong>of</strong> licensees’ Business Conduct Rules<br />

to <strong>the</strong> effective statutory provisions. After comprehensive<br />

discussions in more rounds, provisions serving <strong>the</strong> protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> users have become more stressed in <strong>the</strong> modifi ed Business<br />

Conduct Rules. HEO did not issue any resolutions on<br />

<strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> Business Conduct Rules, but issued seven<br />

resolutions on <strong>the</strong> modifi cation <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> in 2009.<br />

annual report 2009 | 26<br />

Service quality<br />

The minimum quality requirements concerning individual<br />

consumers are prepared on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annual data supply<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>of</strong> Guaranteed Services and <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

licensees’ activity in <strong>the</strong> previous year was completed in June<br />

2009, and can be seen also on <strong>the</strong> webpage <strong>of</strong> HEO. In 2009,<br />

also <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>of</strong> Guaranteed Services itself was modifi ed<br />

in accordance with <strong>the</strong> new regulation and also in line with <strong>the</strong><br />

activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution licensees, and also with <strong>the</strong> activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> universal service licensees operating within a new legal<br />

framework. The resolution on Guaranteed Services imposed<br />

<strong>the</strong> obligation <strong>of</strong> automatic penalty payment with regard<br />

to 10 <strong>of</strong> 13 minimum quality requirements on distribution<br />

licensees, 4 <strong>of</strong> 5 minimum requirements on universal service<br />

suppliers and 3 <strong>of</strong> 4 minimum requirements on trade licensees.<br />

Aggregate fi gures on Guaranteed Services are shown in Table<br />

7.<br />

In 2009, HEO, following a discussion that took for several<br />

months, made a detailed regulation on <strong>the</strong> requirement<br />

II <strong>of</strong> Guaranteed Services for distribution licensees, <strong>the</strong><br />

’restoration <strong>of</strong> interruption <strong>of</strong> electricity supply affecting<br />

several consumption places’ taking into account <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong><br />

extreme wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions ’accompanied by a disturbance<br />

occuring on <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> extreme wear and tear beyond design<br />

conditions’. It was required particularly by <strong>the</strong> failure<br />

between 27 January and 2 February and <strong>the</strong> growing number<br />

<strong>of</strong> requests on exemption due to <strong>the</strong> increasing number <strong>of</strong><br />

failures. The modifi cation affected <strong>the</strong> procedure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

qualifi cation <strong>of</strong> extraordinary events and <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> supply. It is now <strong>the</strong> licensees’s responsibility<br />

to qualify instead <strong>of</strong> an independent organisation, however, if<br />

<strong>the</strong> distribution licensee fails to observe <strong>the</strong> deadline for <strong>the</strong><br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> breakdown, it will pay a penalty to <strong>the</strong> affected<br />

user. Users are entitled for a repeated penalty for each fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

12-hour outage after <strong>the</strong> deadline <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> breakdown<br />

expires. This is a tool for HEO to motivate distributors to<br />

accelerate <strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> breakdowns. Penalty payment<br />

will be automatic from 2011 taking into account <strong>the</strong> time<br />

required for <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IT systems <strong>of</strong> distribution<br />

licensees. Prior to than, penalty is paid based on <strong>the</strong> users’<br />

claim.<br />

In 2009, HEO investigated whe<strong>the</strong>r distribution licensees<br />

observed <strong>the</strong> provisions specifi ed in <strong>the</strong> resolutions on<br />

Guaranteed Services to be provided by distribution licensees,<br />

paid <strong>the</strong> penalties to be paid automatically and managed<br />

properly <strong>the</strong> rides <strong>of</strong> forestry. HEO stated that licensees’ data<br />

registry is suitable to fulfi l <strong>the</strong> Guaranteed Services, and <strong>the</strong><br />

order <strong>of</strong> procedure <strong>of</strong> rider management is suitable for <strong>the</strong><br />

secure operation <strong>of</strong> networks.<br />

From among distribution licensees, DÉMÁSZ Hálózati Elosztó<br />

Kft. paid penalty in each failed case in 2008. (Ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> fulfi lling penalty payments: 100%). The ratio <strong>of</strong> fulfi lling<br />

penalty payments in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r four licensees<br />

varied between 3.5% and 0.4%. From among universal service<br />

licensee, it was DÉMÁSZ Nyrt. again that achieved <strong>the</strong><br />

highest ratio <strong>of</strong> penalty payments (35%), while this ratio was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!