Expanding Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Narrow scope of application / Productivity (36) a. But Oswald doesn't stop by this idea, he says there's a shorter way than following the 2-dimensional tour and he eats a hole through the apple. b. They found that the bee uses its spiky, toothed mouth parts to chew a hole through side of the corolla. c. Perhaps they would’ve sizzled a hole through the gas ball, but would they have hit anything? d. Dribbling a hole through the metal isn’t much different from ramming a war hammer spike through it. e. e. I’ve also put grease fittings in the ball ends, by EDMing a hole through the outer race. f. I think Tomken was worried about rubbing a hole through it. g. With patience and persistence, you can piss a hole through a rock. 70
Productivity and “The Constructional View” a. There is a cline of grammatical phenomena from the totally general to the totally idiosyncratic. b. Everything on this cline is to be stated in a common format, from the most particular, such as individual words, to the most general, such as principles for verb position, with many sub-regularities in between. That is, there is no principled divide between ‘lexicon’ and ‘rules’. c. At the level of phrasal syntax, pieces of syntax connected to meaning in a conventionalized and partially idiosyncratic way are captured by constructions. (Goldberg & Jackendoff 2004: 532-533) 71
Page 1 and 2:
Expanding Construction Grammar and
Page 3 and 4:
Chomsky’s Principles and Paramete
Page 5 and 6:
Chomsky’s Principles and Paramete
Page 7 and 8:
Chomsky (1981) (c) Organization of
Page 9 and 10:
• Movement is “structure preser
Page 11 and 12:
Minimalism • Lexicon • Operatio
Page 13 and 14:
Differences between frameworks Chom
Page 15 and 16:
Symbolic link between form and func
Page 17 and 18:
Another difference Although most of
Page 19 and 20: Uniform representation of all gramm
Page 21 and 22: wanna-contraction (Boas 2004) 21
Page 24 and 25: All levels of grammatical analysis
Page 26 and 27: Organization of constructional know
Page 28 and 29: Taxonomic relations allow us to dis
Page 30 and 31: Combination of different constructi
Page 32 and 33: Interaction between constructions a
Page 34 and 35: Frame Semantics •A “frame” is
Page 36 and 37: Sample Event Frame: Commercial Tran
Page 38 and 39: Different Perspectives Lexical Unit
Page 40 and 41: Frame Description 40
Page 42 and 43: Lexical Entry Report 42
Page 44 and 45: What’s Frame Semantic Information
Page 46 and 47: Polysemy at different levels: argum
Page 48 and 49: Constructional Polysemy of Caused M
Page 50 and 51: Distribution of AHTY (class I verbs
Page 52 and 53: Can we analyze AHTY as a sub- type
Page 54 and 55: Verb classes • But not all of Lev
Page 56 and 57: The AHTY Construction (decoding) 56
Page 58 and 59: Proposal • Conventionalized meani
Page 60 and 61: Mini-constructions: distribution of
Page 62 and 63: Mini-constructions capture item-spe
Page 64 and 65: Joe knocked a hole through the wall
Page 66 and 67: Partial Productivity - Constraint 1
Page 68 and 69: Constraint 3 • Physical propertie
Page 72 and 73: Fillmore et al. (1988): [the X-er t
Page 74 and 75: Construction Grammar(s) • Constru
Page 76 and 77: Different constructionist approache
Page 78 and 79: syntax, semantics, phonology 78
Page 80: Give-construction (Kay & Fillmore 1
show all

Expanding Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?