Expanding Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Proposal • Conventionalized meanings of Class II verbs are encoded in terms of miniconstructions that inherit their meaning and form from the higher-level schematic AHTY Cx. • A mini-construction is a conventionalized form-meaning pairing representing an individual sense of a verb (see Boas 2003 on resultative constructions) 58
Mini-constructions • Extremely specific with respect to the types of form-meaning pairings they represent. • Contain detailed semantic, pragmatic, and syntactic information about the types of event participants that may occur with a specific sense of a verb • Differ in their complexity but are in principle the same type of declaratively represented data structure as other types of constructions (no strict division between the lexicon and syntax) 59
Page 1 and 2:
Expanding Construction Grammar and
Page 3 and 4:
Chomsky’s Principles and Paramete
Page 5 and 6:
Chomsky’s Principles and Paramete
Page 7 and 8: Chomsky (1981) (c) Organization of
Page 9 and 10: • Movement is “structure preser
Page 11 and 12: Minimalism • Lexicon • Operatio
Page 13 and 14: Differences between frameworks Chom
Page 15 and 16: Symbolic link between form and func
Page 17 and 18: Another difference Although most of
Page 19 and 20: Uniform representation of all gramm
Page 21 and 22: wanna-contraction (Boas 2004) 21
Page 24 and 25: All levels of grammatical analysis
Page 26 and 27: Organization of constructional know
Page 28 and 29: Taxonomic relations allow us to dis
Page 30 and 31: Combination of different constructi
Page 32 and 33: Interaction between constructions a
Page 34 and 35: Frame Semantics •A “frame” is
Page 36 and 37: Sample Event Frame: Commercial Tran
Page 38 and 39: Different Perspectives Lexical Unit
Page 40 and 41: Frame Description 40
Page 42 and 43: Lexical Entry Report 42
Page 44 and 45: What’s Frame Semantic Information
Page 46 and 47: Polysemy at different levels: argum
Page 48 and 49: Constructional Polysemy of Caused M
Page 50 and 51: Distribution of AHTY (class I verbs
Page 52 and 53: Can we analyze AHTY as a sub- type
Page 54 and 55: Verb classes • But not all of Lev
Page 56 and 57: The AHTY Construction (decoding) 56
Page 60 and 61: Mini-constructions: distribution of
Page 62 and 63: Mini-constructions capture item-spe
Page 64 and 65: Joe knocked a hole through the wall
Page 66 and 67: Partial Productivity - Constraint 1
Page 68 and 69: Constraint 3 • Physical propertie
Page 70 and 71: Narrow scope of application / Produ
Page 72 and 73: Fillmore et al. (1988): [the X-er t
Page 74 and 75: Construction Grammar(s) • Constru
Page 76 and 77: Different constructionist approache
Page 78 and 79: syntax, semantics, phonology 78
Page 80: Give-construction (Kay & Fillmore 1
show all

Expanding Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?