Expanding Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Interaction between constructions and verbs: Goldberg 1995/2006 A verb's argument structure may be expanded by an independently existing meaningful construction. (1) Pat sliced the carrots into the salad. (caused-motion) (2) Pat sliced Chris a piece of pie. (ditransitive) (3) Emeril sliced and diced his way to stardom. (way constructions) (4) Pat sliced the box open. (resultative) - Focus on argument structure constructions - Role of Frame Semantics (Fillmore 1982) (Goldberg 2006: 7) 32
Short intermission: Frame Semantics “A word’s meaning can be understood only with reference to a structured background of experience, beliefs, or practices.” (Fillmore & Atkins 1992: 76) • In order to understand the meanings of words in a language we must have first knowledge about the conceptual structures, or semantic frames 33
Page 1 and 2: Expanding Construction Grammar and
Page 3 and 4: Chomsky’s Principles and Paramete
Page 5 and 6: Chomsky’s Principles and Paramete
Page 7 and 8: Chomsky (1981) (c) Organization of
Page 9 and 10: • Movement is “structure preser
Page 11 and 12: Minimalism • Lexicon • Operatio
Page 13 and 14: Differences between frameworks Chom
Page 15 and 16: Symbolic link between form and func
Page 17 and 18: Another difference Although most of
Page 19 and 20: Uniform representation of all gramm
Page 21 and 22: wanna-contraction (Boas 2004) 21
Page 24 and 25: All levels of grammatical analysis
Page 26 and 27: Organization of constructional know
Page 28 and 29: Taxonomic relations allow us to dis
Page 30 and 31: Combination of different constructi
Page 34 and 35: Frame Semantics •A “frame” is
Page 36 and 37: Sample Event Frame: Commercial Tran
Page 38 and 39: Different Perspectives Lexical Unit
Page 40 and 41: Frame Description 40
Page 42 and 43: Lexical Entry Report 42
Page 44 and 45: What’s Frame Semantic Information
Page 46 and 47: Polysemy at different levels: argum
Page 48 and 49: Constructional Polysemy of Caused M
Page 50 and 51: Distribution of AHTY (class I verbs
Page 52 and 53: Can we analyze AHTY as a sub- type
Page 54 and 55: Verb classes • But not all of Lev
Page 56 and 57: The AHTY Construction (decoding) 56
Page 58 and 59: Proposal • Conventionalized meani
Page 60 and 61: Mini-constructions: distribution of
Page 62 and 63: Mini-constructions capture item-spe
Page 64 and 65: Joe knocked a hole through the wall
Page 66 and 67: Partial Productivity - Constraint 1
Page 68 and 69: Constraint 3 • Physical propertie
Page 70 and 71: Narrow scope of application / Produ
Page 72 and 73: Fillmore et al. (1988): [the X-er t
Page 74 and 75: Construction Grammar(s) • Constru
Page 76 and 77: Different constructionist approache
Page 78 and 79: syntax, semantics, phonology 78
Page 80: Give-construction (Kay & Fillmore 1

Expanding Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?