07.04.2013 Views

Download Full Document - Mountain Boomer Music!

Download Full Document - Mountain Boomer Music!

Download Full Document - Mountain Boomer Music!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1996 McGUIRE- SYSTEMATICS OF CROTAPHY TID LIZARDS 57<br />

just reaches forelimb insertion, (2) terminates (I) golden tan; (2) straw yellow; (3) aquamarine<br />

within antehumeral fold, (3) terminates before to cobalt blue; (4) brown; (5) olive green, turentering<br />

antehumeral fold.<br />

76. Dark nuchal spots (P): (0) absent, (I) present.<br />

quoise, or gray.<br />

77. Inguinal patches (P): (0) absent, (I) present.<br />

78. Inguinal patches (U): (0) small, (1) large (taxa<br />

without inguinal patches coded as unknown<br />

["?"I)<br />

79. Femoral pore secretions (P): (0) off-white to gray,<br />

(1) black.<br />

80. Black pigmentation in central region of gular<br />

BEHAVIOR<br />

86. Saxicoly (including the use of saltatory bipedal<br />

locomotion in rocky habitats) (U): (0) absent,<br />

(1) present.<br />

87. Territoriality (P): (0) present, (1) absent.<br />

88. Lateral tail coiling (P): (0) absent, (1) present.<br />

pattern (U): (0) absent, (1) present.<br />

8 1. Peripheral gular pattern (U): (0) reticulated, (1)<br />

pale spots or radiating oblique stripes.<br />

82. Gular pattern (U): (0) present only in adults and<br />

well developed in males only, (1) well developed<br />

in all age classes and in both sexes.<br />

83. Enlarged melanic axillary patches (P): (0) absent,<br />

(1) present.<br />

84. Ventrolateral coloration (P, UO): (0) does not<br />

differ from ventral coloration (white), (1) olive<br />

green, (2) orange, (3) blue.<br />

85. Dorsal coloration (U, UO): (0) off-white to tan;<br />

ALLozYMES<br />

89. H-LDH (U): four electromorphs.<br />

90. aGPD (U): two electromorphs.<br />

9 1. 6-PGD (U): three electromorphs.<br />

92. ICDs (U): four electromorphs.<br />

93. ICDm (U): four electromorphs.<br />

94. GOTs (U): three electromorphs.<br />

95. Pro (U): two electromorphs.<br />

96. Est 1 (U): three electromorphs.<br />

97. Hbpf (U): two electromorphs.<br />

98. Tr (U): four electromorphs.<br />

An initial analysis was performed on the mor-<br />

phological data set of 88 characters (allozyme data<br />

of Montanucci et al. [I9751 not included). This re-<br />

sulted in the discovery of a single tree (Fig. 37) with<br />

a length of 12,334 (123.34 when the effect of weight-<br />

ing the characters is removed) and a consistency<br />

index (CI; excluding uninformative characters) of<br />

0.761, a retention index (RI) of 0.848, and a g, tree<br />

length frequency distribution skewness value of<br />

- 1.49 (the critical g, value for this data set when<br />

randomized is -0.16 [P 5 0.01 1); Table 1). This CI<br />

is greater than that expected for an analysis of 13<br />

taxa (expected CI = 0.649; Sanderson and Dono-<br />

ghue, 1989), indicating that there is less homoplasy<br />

than expected in these data when compared with<br />

the 60 data sets reexamined by Sanderson and Don-<br />

oghue (1989). The g, value is strongly left skewed<br />

suggesting that the data are phylogenetically infor-<br />

mative. The tree generated in the bootstrap analysis<br />

is presented in Figure 38.<br />

Reanalysis of the allozyme data set of Montanucci<br />

et al. (1 975) using the Manhattan distance frequency<br />

approach resulted in the discovery of a single most<br />

parsimonious tree (Fig. 39A). The tree length fre-<br />

quency distribution data, summarized by the g, sta-<br />

RESULTS<br />

tistic (Hillis and Huelsenbeck, 1992), suggests that<br />

there is phylogenetically informative signal in this<br />

data set (observed g, value of -0.50; the critical g,<br />

value for this data set when randomized is -0.45<br />

[P r 0.011). The bootstrap tree for the analysis is<br />

given in Figure 39B (see comments below regarding<br />

interpretation of bootstrap P values).<br />

Because analysis of both the morphological and<br />

allozyme data sets suggests that they contain phy-<br />

logenetic signal, these data sets were combined and<br />

the larger data set was analyzed. Analysis of the<br />

combined morphology and allozyme data sets re-<br />

sulted in the same tree as did the analysis of the<br />

morphology data alone (Fig. 37). The tree length is<br />

139.91, while the C1 (excluding uninformative char-<br />

acters) for the combined tree is 0.761, the RI is<br />

0.848, and the g, value is - 1.45 (critical g, value<br />

= -0.15 [P I 0.0 I]). PAUP is unable to incorporate<br />

the step matrix characters into the CI and RI cal-<br />

culations, which explains why the CI and RI values<br />

are identical to those discovered in the analysis of<br />

the morphological data alone. The g, and CI values<br />

indicate that the data harbor substantial phyloge-<br />

netic signal. The 50 percent majority-rule consensus<br />

tree generated in the bootstrap analysis of the com-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!