Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library
Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library
Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1-43<br />
westerly section of the Kill van Kull, where concentrations significantly exceed the ER-M value.<br />
This is also true in the deeper sediments (between 0.5 and 4 ft) of the Kill van Kull, which also<br />
suggests the presence of other potential sources of lead in the vicinity of the Kill van Kull. In<br />
<strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> proper, deeper sediments have generally lower levels of lead, with the exception of<br />
locations closer to the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, where deeper sediments have significantly higher<br />
levels that are well in excess of the ER-M. Data reported by Suszkowski (1978) suggest that surficial<br />
sediment lead concentrations were somewhat higher at that time, with a number of surface sediment<br />
concentrations exceeding the ER-M. Whether the surface lead data of Figure 1-22 should be<br />
considered as being indicative of conditions having improved since 1976, or simply an artifact of use<br />
of different sampling or analytical methods, requires further review. (This same point applies to the<br />
comparisons to be made with other 1976 sediment metal results as well.)<br />
In general, the levels of nickel in surface sediments are between the ER-M (51,600 ng/g) and<br />
the ER-L (20,900 ng/g) values (Figure 1-23). There are, however, exceptions – the ER-M is<br />
exceeded in surface sediments at locations close to the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, but also<br />
downstream between RM4 and RM6, as well as occasionally in the Kill van Kull. These results also<br />
suggest the presence of other potential sources of nickel in the vicinity of Kills. In deeper<br />
sediments, nickel levels tend to increase relative to surface levels where measured throughout the<br />
domain. This is particularly noticeable in the first two miles and in the lower section of <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>,<br />
in the 2 to 4 ft sediment layer. The surficial sediment nickel concentrations reported by Suszkowski<br />
were comparable to the results of Figure 1-23, with most values in the range of 10,000 to 100,000<br />
ng/g and a number of sample results exceeding the ER-M for nickel.<br />
Arsenic levels in surface sediments are well below the ER-M value (70,000 ng/g), and hover<br />
above the ER-L guideline of 8200 ng/g (Figure 1-24). It is however noteworthy, that despite the<br />
limited number of measurements, arsenic concentrations seem to increase with depth, particularly at<br />
locations close to the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, where the 7 to 13 ft layer shows one instance<br />
where the arsenic level is close to the ER-M guideline value. The 1976 surface sediment arsenic<br />
levels seem to have been comparable to the more recent data of Figure 1-24.<br />
Cadmium concentrations in surface sediments are generally substantially lower than the ER-<br />
M (9600 ng/g) but still higher than the ER-L (1200 ng/g) (Figure 1-25). However, in deeper<br />
sediments closer to the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, but also in certain areas of the Kill van Kull (at<br />
RM6.8, between 0.5 and 2 ft), cadmium levels are in excess of the ER-M. The 1976 surficial Cd<br />
concentrations reported by Suszkowski (1978) indicated numerous values in excess of the ER-M<br />
with a maximum concentration of 31,000 ng/g. Samples from a limited number of borings, which<br />
had concentrations in the range of 600 – 3400 ng/g, had somewhat lower levels than was indicated<br />
by the surface samples.<br />
In spite of the trends of metal contamination in <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> sediments described above, the<br />
deposition, resuspension and redeposition features of the <strong>Bay</strong> have likely altered historic spatial