Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library
Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library
Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1-38<br />
Individual sediment core vertical profiles for DDT (Figure 1-19) also reveal that<br />
measurements in sediment cores were in most cases limited to shallow layers (0 to 6 ft), except near<br />
the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, where DDT levels in deeper sediments (14 ft) could be four times<br />
higher than in the surface layer (e.g., stations 96A-NWB and 81A-NWB). Notwithstanding that<br />
DDT levels in deep sediments (4 ft) of south <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> may also be elevated (e.g., station 70A-<br />
NWB), the high concentrations at the surface suggest the existence of possible on-going sources.<br />
Metals. Of the metals that are available in the database, the spatial distribution of mercury,<br />
chromium, lead, nickel, arsenic, and cadmium in surface and sub-surface sediments of <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong><br />
and the Kill van Kull are shown in Figures 1-20 through 1-25. Unlike in the lower <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />
where metal levels often exceed the ER-M guidelines, only levels of mercury and to a lesser extent<br />
chromium and nickel are in excess of the ER-M in <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>.<br />
Mercury concentrations in surface as well as in deeper sediments exceed both the ER-L (150<br />
ng/g) and ER-M (710 ng/g) throughout <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> into the Kill van Kull (Figure 1-20); the<br />
detected concentrations are between 5 to 20 times higher than the medium and low range of<br />
ecological effects. As is the case with other contaminants, there are large gaps in mercury<br />
measurements in the sub-surface sediments, in particular, between RM1.5 and RM4. A preliminary<br />
inspection of the 1976 surface grab sample data of Suszkowski (1978) indicates that mercury levels<br />
at that time were similar in magnitude to the results shown on Figure 1-20, generally on the order of<br />
1000 – 10,000 ng/g. Inspection of results from a limited number of borings failed to reveal a<br />
consistent pattern, though a more detailed review of these data is warranted. It should be noted that<br />
an assessment effort is currently being conducted to better evaluate Berry’s Creek as a potential<br />
source of mercury into <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>. The result of the evaluation will ultimately be integrated into<br />
the modeling effort.<br />
Throughout <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>, chromium concentrations in the surface sediment are between the<br />
ER-M (370,000 ng/g) and ER-L (81,000 ng/g) values (Figure 1-21). The ER-M is exceeded only<br />
once in the Kill van Kull area. In deeper sediments, levels of chromium are somewhat lower than in<br />
the surface sediment, except at locations closer to the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, where deep<br />
sediments (12 ft) show elevated chromium concentrations in excess of the ER-M value.<br />
Suszkowski’s (1978) surface grab sample results from 1976 were comparable in magnitude, though<br />
some results were higher than the concentrations of Figure 1-21, with a number of samples having<br />
chromium levels in excess of the ER-M.<br />
Except in the proximity of the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, the levels of lead in <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong><br />
surface sediment generally remain between the ER-M (218,000 ng/g) and ER-L (46,700 ng/g) values<br />
(Figure 1-22). Also, in spite of the apparent decrease in lead concentrations in the lower section of<br />
<strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>, between RM5.5 and RM6.5, there is an apparent surge in lead concentration in the