07.04.2013 Views

Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library

Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library

Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1-33<br />

locations indicate that OCDD is still prevalent in the sub-surface sediments (Figure 1-15). It is<br />

important to use caution in the interpretation of the vertical profiles given the gaps in the data in<br />

deeper layers, in particular in the upper section of the <strong>Bay</strong> between RM1 and RM3.<br />

As with TCDD, there is no clear pattern to the lateral distribution of OCDD levels;<br />

concentrations vary independently of the proximity to the shore (Figure 1-16).<br />

Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). Most of the PAHs reported in TSI’s database have<br />

no risk guidelines, as is the case with some PCB congeners. The spatial distribution of total PAHs<br />

(tPAHs) in surface and subsurface sediments are shown in Figure 1-17. In general, the data reveals<br />

that many of the tPAH concentrations are between the ER-L (4000 ng/g) and ER-M (45,000 ng/g)<br />

(as evaluated by Long et al., 1995), and in some cases, there are peaks that are orders of magnitude<br />

higher than the ER-M. Total PAH concentrations decrease from a peak concentration close to<br />

100,000 ng/g near the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>, to an average of 20,000 ng/g in the first two<br />

miles of <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>, to about 10,000 ng/g in the main channel towards the Kills. There are also<br />

two significant peaks in the longitudinal distribution of PAHs, at RM1.2 and RM2.1. At the mouth<br />

of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong> and one mile south, tPAH levels remain high in the sub-surface sediments (e.g.,<br />

13 ft below surface), at levels comparable to those measured at the surface. Between RM0.5 and<br />

RM1, tPAHs levels seem to increase with depth at levels that exceed both the ER-L and ER-M<br />

guidelines. In the rest of the <strong>Bay</strong>, unlike the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong> where tPAH concentrations increase in<br />

depth after an initial drop in shallower layers, tPAH levels generally decrease with depth [with the<br />

exception of a location in the middle section of the <strong>Bay</strong> (~RM5.4) where surface and 4-ft deep<br />

sediments have similar tPAH levels]. It is important to use the same note of caution expressed for<br />

dioxins – there are significant data gaps in the vertical profiles for deeper layers, in particular in the<br />

upper section of the <strong>Bay</strong> between RM1 and RM4. As is the case for PCBs and dioxins, tPAHs are<br />

likely candidates to be considered as COPCs/COPECs.<br />

Pesticides. The analysis shown in Figure 1-18 focuses on DDT to illustrate the spatial<br />

distribution of a well-studied pesticide in <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> sediments. It should not be inferred from this<br />

spatial distribution, however, that other DDT species or other pesticides will necessarily follow the<br />

same pattern as DDT. In any case, the data reveal that surficial sediment DDT concentrations<br />

exhibit a pattern of decreasing concentration from the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong> to a location 1.5<br />

miles south of the mouth, in <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> (upper panel of Figure 1-18); however, between RM3.8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!