07.04.2013 Views

Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library

Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library

Newark Bay Study - Passaic River Public Digital Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1-24<br />

chemicals and biological tissues monitored), spatial (i.e., only few locations covered), and temporal<br />

(i.e., not often enough) distribution of information in the <strong>Bay</strong>. It is the intention of the Field<br />

Sampling Program performed by TSI as part of its Remedial Investigation Work Plan (TSI, 2004) to<br />

begin to address the data gaps in the study domain.<br />

The most pertinent plots are presented and discussed as part of this modeling plan and the<br />

main observations about the spatial and temporal relationships that exist within the domain for the<br />

selected chemicals are presented below. The discussions are not intended to be exhaustive, but<br />

rather a summary of the most important data features and availability.<br />

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). Figure 1-7 shows total PCBs as the sum of congeners (closed<br />

circles ●), sum of homologs (open circles ○), and the sum of coplanar congeners (open triangles ª) in<br />

surface sediments and with depth in the <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>-Kill van Kull domain. The data reveals that at<br />

every river mile within the <strong>Bay</strong> and at a few locations in the Kill van Kull, both the 23 ng/g ER-L<br />

and the 180 ng/g ER-M values are exceeded. Since they are a specific subset of the PCB congeners,<br />

the concentrations of coplanar congeners are systematically lower than the total PCBs. There is no<br />

noticeable spatial trend in the surface sediments within <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>. Lower detections were<br />

encountered in the Kill van Kull, but very few samples were available for review, some of which did<br />

exceed the guidelines. The average total PCB level in <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> surface sediment is 332 ng/g in<br />

the top 12 cm, whereas the highest concentration was 1990 ng/g at approximately RM3.8 into the<br />

<strong>Bay</strong>. In general, levels of PCBs decrease slightly with depth, except at the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong><br />

<strong>River</strong> where deeper sediments (3 to 6 ft and 7 to 13 ft) have concentrations of coplanar PCBs similar<br />

to or even exceeding what is observed in surface sediments. Yet, it is not uncommon to find high<br />

levels of PCBs in deeper layers of sediments into <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>, as is the case at RM6.9 where<br />

concentrations of coplanar PCBs are higher in deeper sediments (3 to 6 ft) than at 0.5 to 3 ft. Note<br />

that total PCB measurements are available only for the layer between 0 and 4.5 ft, and are spatially<br />

limited to either the mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong> or to a section between RM4 and RM5.2.<br />

Vertical concentration profiles on selected cores show different patterns (Figure 1-8). Data<br />

from three cores collected close to each other show consistently high surface and subsurface<br />

coplanar PCB concentrations in one core 100A-NWB, and decreasing levels with increasing depth in<br />

the other cores (99A-NWB and 98A-NWB, northern <strong>Newark</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>). In the mid-section of the <strong>Bay</strong>,<br />

decreasing PCB levels with depth were also noted, although in many cases there were no<br />

measurements performed on sediments deeper than 4.5 ft. Note that the plotted sediment core<br />

concentrations are those reported at the top of the depth intervals, although, like in core number<br />

98A-NWB (mouth of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>), the sampled intervals are very small: top 0.17 ft, between<br />

2.8 and 2.9 ft, exactly at 4.6 ft, and at 6 ft. The profile of that core, however, suggests that most of<br />

the PCBs reside in the upper layer, since it is located in a low depositional area. However, the<br />

interpretation of the depth profiles to reconstitute the history of deposition is limited in the absence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!