07.04.2013 Views

Appendix C - Passaic River Public Digital Library

Appendix C - Passaic River Public Digital Library

Appendix C - Passaic River Public Digital Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.0 INTRODUCTION<br />

This document presents the human health and ecological risk assessments to support the Focused<br />

Feasibility Study (FFS) for the Lower <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong> Restoration Project (LPRRP). The FFS was<br />

undertaken to evaluate the need for, and feasibility of implementing an early action to control the<br />

sediments of the lower 8 miles of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>. Those sediments were identified as a major source of<br />

contamination to the 17-mile tidal portion of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong> during a comprehensive study, which is<br />

still on-going. The FFS evaluates alternative remedial actions within three target areas for the lower<br />

8 miles of the Lower <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>. These target areas have been defined based on sediment and<br />

bathymetric data collection and evaluation.<br />

Human health and ecological risk assessments are designed to aid in risk management decisions regarding<br />

the actions necessary to address the hazardous substances at a site. This document assesses current risk to<br />

assist the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in evaluating the need for<br />

undertaking early action in the sediments of the lower 8 miles of the <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>. The overall process<br />

for assessing risk is as follows: (1) risks associated with current conditions are estimated, and (2) risks<br />

under current conditions are then compared to future risks estimated to remain after remediation of<br />

specific target areas. The comparison of current and future conditions was used to evaluate the benefits of<br />

remediating each of the three target areas. This comparison ultimately determines the areal extent of the<br />

active alternatives developed for the FFS.<br />

As part of the FFS, this document follows a screening level risk assessment approach based on USEPA<br />

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) (1989; 1997a; 1998). It relies on data and analytical<br />

tools that existed at the time that the FFS was undertaken, within the on-going, comprehensive 17-mile<br />

study of the Lower <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>. It provides the information necessary to develop a remedial action<br />

prior to the completion of a baseline risk assessment and a full Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study<br />

(RI/FS). This sort of phased approach to evaluating early action during an on-going RI/FS is consistent<br />

with USEPA’s Contaminated Sediment Remediation Guidance for Hazardous Waste Sites (USEPA<br />

2005a). As the comprehensive 17-mile study proceeds to conclusion, a baseline human health risk<br />

assessment (HHRA) and ecological risk assessment (ERA) will be developed, based on the full range of<br />

data and analytical tools expected to be completed for the comprehensive study, to support a final<br />

remedial decision for the 17 miles of the Lower <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong>.<br />

Draft Focused Feasibility Study Risk Assessment 1-1 June 2007<br />

Lower <strong>Passaic</strong> <strong>River</strong> Restoration Project <strong>Appendix</strong> C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!