Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2951<br />
A couple of housekeep<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs. You gentlemen agreed that you<br />
would provide this committee with a list of any bus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ess deal<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs<br />
that Dr. Bergman had with Rabbi Twersky.<br />
Would you be k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d enough to supply that to us with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a reas<strong>on</strong>able<br />
time?*<br />
Sec<strong>on</strong>d and third, the accountant that you have used is Samuel<br />
Dachowitz. Would you be k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d enough to have him c<strong>on</strong>tact the committee<br />
and help us <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terpolate some data?<br />
I am <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formed, I do not know if this is accurate or not, but that<br />
Mr. Dachowitz could not be reached. Repeated efforts by the committee<br />
were not successful to reach him, and we would like to have<br />
your help <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tact<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g him, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> giv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g us whatever assistance we<br />
might need <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terpolat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g data.<br />
Mr. LEWIN. The best we can do is try to speak to him to get him<br />
to cooperate. We certa<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ly do not c<strong>on</strong>trol Mr. Dachowitz, and we<br />
cannot c<strong>on</strong>trol his acti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
We will make that effort. Let me also s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce we are talk<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g about<br />
housekeep<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g details, not to go through it, but I th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k the committee<br />
should also have exhibits of other documents that were taken from<br />
the health department file, which specifically they are aga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
the same nature of the family tree, because the health department<br />
is part of its profile, as appears from the file, they went through to<br />
f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d out what the problems were with Dr. Bergman, and why this<br />
was, this was the reas<strong>on</strong> for oppositi<strong>on</strong> to his applicati<strong>on</strong>, and if the<br />
committee goes through those exhibits, I th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k you will see that they<br />
made various allegati<strong>on</strong>s aga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>st Dr. Bergman <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> regard to homes.<br />
Senator Moss. We will accept those documents.**<br />
Mr. HALAMANDARIS. Let me ask counsel, what your explanati<strong>on</strong> is<br />
for the apparent <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>accuracies <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the list of homes, et cetera, supplied<br />
by the New York Department of Health.<br />
I have never known the department of health to be <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>competent<br />
or <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>accurate, and I th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k it is fair that we should hear a representative<br />
from the department of health to see what they have to say<br />
about this matter.<br />
Are you agreeable to that?<br />
Mr. LEWIN. I would love to hear from them as to what their basis<br />
is for this.<br />
As I said the file is now public. What the file would show is that<br />
various people at the bureaucratic civil service level determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed at an<br />
early stage they did not like Dr. Bergman. They thought he had various<br />
associati<strong>on</strong>s with all k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ds of nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g homes, and they then went<br />
out to manufacture allegati<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> their prec<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Let me say <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> this regard, and I th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k it is important, and I th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k<br />
it is a fact that the committee may not be totally appreciative of.<br />
There are <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dustry, the nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g home <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dustry <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> New York,<br />
a variety of people like Dr. Bergman, who are of the Orthodox Jewish<br />
faith. That is a small community. There may be an associati<strong>on</strong> of<br />
those with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the department of health, that everybody of the Orthodox<br />
Jewish faith are associated with each other.<br />
* See appendix 2, item 3, p. 2964.<br />
** Subsequently received pursuant to committee subpena. See appendix of "<str<strong>on</strong>g>Trends</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>L<strong>on</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-Ter<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Care</str<strong>on</strong>g>," part 24, Feb. 4, 1975.