07.04.2013 Views

Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2904<br />

amount of its renovati<strong>on</strong>s, it should not be able to, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> any sense of the<br />

word, support a debt of $1.3 milli<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Senator Moss. Is there any noticeable difference <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the quality of the<br />

care that is rendered to the patients, as you can see, by reas<strong>on</strong> of this<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the reimbursement?<br />

Mr. MOAN. Well, my understand<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, we first of all have not found<br />

direct correlati<strong>on</strong>. We have not, tak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g every nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g home that we<br />

have, found problems with, transfers with, and checked them for<br />

problems <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> deficiency reports of the city and the State, but what I do<br />

know, for example, that <strong>on</strong>e nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g home, the Willoughby Nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

Home had the reputati<strong>on</strong> of deliver<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g very bad care, and we had testim<strong>on</strong>y<br />

of such effect before the commissi<strong>on</strong> at some of our hear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs.<br />

I also know that some of the other <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>s that we have looked<br />

at, Towers is <strong>on</strong>e, also had atrocious care, so that I know at least <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> isolated<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stances, that we have found situati<strong>on</strong>s where transfers, a history<br />

of transfers has occurred <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a build<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g where there is def<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itely<br />

bad care be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g delivered.<br />

We do not know if <strong>on</strong>e is caus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the effect, however.<br />

Senator Moss. Is there any appreciable difference <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the reimbursement<br />

rate between, say, 100-bed nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g homes and 300-bed nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

homes?<br />

Mr. MOAN. Yes. The ceil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g for all of these th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs was calculated <strong>on</strong><br />

an average bed basis, so that if you had a 100-bed, and your reimbursement<br />

rate is $110 per bed, the maximum ceil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, you can get <strong>on</strong> this<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong> is $110,000.<br />

If you have a 300-bed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>, it would be $330,000, so that the<br />

ceil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs are calculated accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to the number of beds; however, the<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual rents sometimes bear no relati<strong>on</strong> to the number of beds <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Senator Moss. The unit reimbursables, the calculati<strong>on</strong> is agreed <strong>on</strong><br />

the bed-<br />

Mr. MOAN. That is correct.<br />

Senator Moss. Not putt<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g nurses' homes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to various categories?<br />

Mr. MOAN. That is right. There was a proposal, that was with the<br />

State department of health, to limit future reimbursement to historic<br />

costs, that is to say that an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>, which was built <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1973, for<br />

$500,000, for $1 milli<strong>on</strong>, would <strong>on</strong>ly be reimbursed <strong>on</strong> that historic cost,<br />

and not <strong>on</strong> any of the land transfers that have taken place, and it would<br />

not vary if it had been leased to a third pers<strong>on</strong>, or leased to the owner<br />

himself, so all of these th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs have been taken a look at by the State<br />

department of health, as far as I know.<br />

However, they have yet to come down with a formal rul<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> that<br />

proposal, so that right now the reimbursement formula is generally<br />

based <strong>on</strong> the number of beds, rather than a physical exam<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

build<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, so we may have <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>s receiv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g rents that have no relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />

to the real value of the build<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g itself.<br />

Senator Moss. The department of health could make a decisi<strong>on</strong> as<br />

to whether there are too many beds <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a home, I take it, from your testim<strong>on</strong>y,<br />

about disallow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 53, or some number like that?<br />

Mr. MOAN. Fifty-seven, I believe it was. Yes, they can decertify beds.<br />

My understand<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is that the nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g home that I described, the Willoughby<br />

Nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Home, was certified for 210 beds, when there was a<br />

severe bed shortage, and so that they felt it was justifiable at the time

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!