Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Trends in Long-Term Care - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2904<br />
amount of its renovati<strong>on</strong>s, it should not be able to, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> any sense of the<br />
word, support a debt of $1.3 milli<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Senator Moss. Is there any noticeable difference <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the quality of the<br />
care that is rendered to the patients, as you can see, by reas<strong>on</strong> of this<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the reimbursement?<br />
Mr. MOAN. Well, my understand<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, we first of all have not found<br />
direct correlati<strong>on</strong>. We have not, tak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g every nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g home that we<br />
have, found problems with, transfers with, and checked them for<br />
problems <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> deficiency reports of the city and the State, but what I do<br />
know, for example, that <strong>on</strong>e nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g home, the Willoughby Nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
Home had the reputati<strong>on</strong> of deliver<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g very bad care, and we had testim<strong>on</strong>y<br />
of such effect before the commissi<strong>on</strong> at some of our hear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs.<br />
I also know that some of the other <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>s that we have looked<br />
at, Towers is <strong>on</strong>e, also had atrocious care, so that I know at least <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> isolated<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stances, that we have found situati<strong>on</strong>s where transfers, a history<br />
of transfers has occurred <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a build<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g where there is def<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itely<br />
bad care be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g delivered.<br />
We do not know if <strong>on</strong>e is caus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the effect, however.<br />
Senator Moss. Is there any appreciable difference <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the reimbursement<br />
rate between, say, 100-bed nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g homes and 300-bed nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
homes?<br />
Mr. MOAN. Yes. The ceil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g for all of these th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs was calculated <strong>on</strong><br />
an average bed basis, so that if you had a 100-bed, and your reimbursement<br />
rate is $110 per bed, the maximum ceil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, you can get <strong>on</strong> this<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong> is $110,000.<br />
If you have a 300-bed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>, it would be $330,000, so that the<br />
ceil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs are calculated accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to the number of beds; however, the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual rents sometimes bear no relati<strong>on</strong> to the number of beds <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Senator Moss. The unit reimbursables, the calculati<strong>on</strong> is agreed <strong>on</strong><br />
the bed-<br />
Mr. MOAN. That is correct.<br />
Senator Moss. Not putt<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g nurses' homes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to various categories?<br />
Mr. MOAN. That is right. There was a proposal, that was with the<br />
State department of health, to limit future reimbursement to historic<br />
costs, that is to say that an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>, which was built <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1973, for<br />
$500,000, for $1 milli<strong>on</strong>, would <strong>on</strong>ly be reimbursed <strong>on</strong> that historic cost,<br />
and not <strong>on</strong> any of the land transfers that have taken place, and it would<br />
not vary if it had been leased to a third pers<strong>on</strong>, or leased to the owner<br />
himself, so all of these th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs have been taken a look at by the State<br />
department of health, as far as I know.<br />
However, they have yet to come down with a formal rul<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> that<br />
proposal, so that right now the reimbursement formula is generally<br />
based <strong>on</strong> the number of beds, rather than a physical exam<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />
build<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, so we may have <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stituti<strong>on</strong>s receiv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g rents that have no relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />
to the real value of the build<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g itself.<br />
Senator Moss. The department of health could make a decisi<strong>on</strong> as<br />
to whether there are too many beds <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a home, I take it, from your testim<strong>on</strong>y,<br />
about disallow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 53, or some number like that?<br />
Mr. MOAN. Fifty-seven, I believe it was. Yes, they can decertify beds.<br />
My understand<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is that the nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g home that I described, the Willoughby<br />
Nurs<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Home, was certified for 210 beds, when there was a<br />
severe bed shortage, and so that they felt it was justifiable at the time