07.04.2013 Views

The Geography of Phytochemical Races

The Geography of Phytochemical Races

The Geography of Phytochemical Races

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2 Across the Indian Ocean (Primarily) 185<br />

from the nineteenth century. Referring to Leptocarpus, a genus that in the older<br />

treatment encompassed ten species from Australia, and one each from New Zealand,<br />

Southeastern Asia, and Chile, now is considered to consist <strong>of</strong> three species. Former<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the genus are now dispersed in Apodasmia, Dapsilanthus, and Stenotalis.<br />

Flavonoid pr<strong>of</strong>i les now follow more closely the taxonomy <strong>of</strong> the genera rather than<br />

their geographic location.<br />

An interesting result <strong>of</strong> this taxonomic house cleaning is the disposition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chilean taxon, which is now considered as Apodasmia chilensis (Gay) B. G. Briggs &<br />

L. A. S. Johnson. Apodasmia is considered to consist <strong>of</strong> three species, the Chilean taxon<br />

A. chilensis just noted, A. brownii (Hook. f.) B. G. Briggs & L. A. S. Johnson from<br />

South Australia, Tasmania, and Victoria, and A. ceramophila from Western Australia.<br />

A remarkable fi nding is the presence <strong>of</strong> a very unusual compound, gossypetin 7-methyl<br />

ether 3-O-glucoside-8-O-galactoside [321] (the sugars may be reversed) in both the<br />

Chilean and southeastern Australian species. It would seem remarkable were this very<br />

unusual compound to occur by chance in two taxa separated by such distance; a close<br />

relationship between these two species seems a reasonable possibility, one that might<br />

well be addressed by macromolecular means.<br />

<strong>The</strong> overall generic fl avonoid distribution from the two geographic areas can<br />

best be appreciated by referring to the tabulated data from the recent Williams et al.<br />

(1998) paper and the earlier study by Harborne (1979). This compilation, with the<br />

compounds rearranged in increasing structural complexity, appears as Table 4.3.<br />

Several signifi cant differences are evident among which is the very strong predominance<br />

<strong>of</strong> fl avones in Australian species, 0.57–0.17 in the case <strong>of</strong> luteolin and a<br />

Table 4.3 Distribution <strong>of</strong> fl avonoids in Restionaceae in Australia and Africa (from Williams<br />

et al., 1998)<br />

Compound Frequency <strong>of</strong> compound in species from<br />

Australia Africa<br />

Apigenin 0.01 0.02<br />

Luteolin 0.57 0.17<br />

Chrysoeriol 0.08 0.05<br />

Tricin 0.17 nda Hypolaetin 0.48 nd<br />

C-Glycosylfl avones 0.16 0.26<br />

Kaempferol 0.09 0.10<br />

Herbacetin 4′-methyl nd 0.07<br />

Quercetin 0.30 0.31<br />

Quercetin 3-methyl 0.01 nd<br />

Isorhamnetin 0.09 nd<br />

Myricetin 0.09 0.22<br />

Larycitrin nd 0.24<br />

Syringetin nd 0.21<br />

Gossypetin 0.09 0.05<br />

Gossypetin 7-methyl 0.03 0.10<br />

Proanthocyanidins 0.04 0.88<br />

Sulfated derivatives<br />

a nd = not detected.<br />

0.27 0.02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!