07.04.2013 Views

1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us

1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us

1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DULUTH AND ST. LOUIS COUNTY 569<br />

when one realizes that from one alone of Hibbing's open-pits, the<br />

Mahoning-Hull-R<strong>us</strong>t, came about 9,000,000 tons of the 40,0000,000<br />

tons won for the world and the allies from the Mesabi Range in 1917.<br />

Moving of the Village.—While it is erroneo<strong>us</strong> to state that Ribbing<br />

as a whole is being removed, it is proper to assert that all buildings<br />

on the original townsite will have to be removed. The removal<br />

will be undertaken gradually, and even when completed, about twothirds<br />

of what is known as the "old town" will remain undisturbed,<br />

the Pillsbury and another "forty" not being needed by the mining company.<br />

The Minneapolis Daily Tribune, of May, 1920, stated :<br />

For twenty years it has been common knowledg'e to the townspeople<br />

that the ore body in the east, west, and north sides of the original townsite<br />

of Hibbing- extended under the principal b<strong>us</strong>iness section. * * *<br />

For the last ten* years the most densely populated district of Hibbing<br />

has been surrounded by open pits, making it impossible for the town to expand.<br />

The northerly extremity extends out thumb-like and somewhat like a<br />

plateau, some of its buildings being perched on the edge of a wild gorge,<br />

hewn deep into the earth. Since the original townsite was laid out, the mines<br />

have steadily encroached on it, the Sellers' from the north and east, and<br />

the R<strong>us</strong>t from the west.<br />

The Oliver Company * * * ^a^j already acquired the right to the<br />

minerals under part of the town by lease, in 1899, and two years ago began<br />

to buy the surface rights. It paid $2,500,000 for them, and today owns the<br />

majority of the lots and buildings in an area of more than eight city blocks.<br />

After these purchases were made, it became necessary to acquire a new<br />

location for that part of the town that had to .be transplanted. One mile<br />

away was the Central Addition, owned by the mining company, and here is<br />

to be the "New Hibbing."<br />

The first buildings moved from the original townsite to the new addition,<br />

in September, 1918. All frame buildings in good condition have been<br />

transferred. * * *<br />

The moving of the buildings had to be done by steam log haulers and<br />

tanks (traction engines) of the caterpiller type.<br />

The Central Addition is growing very rapidly. Since last September<br />

sixty-two buildings, dwellings, and three store buildings have 'been moved<br />

onto the site, and twenty-four new buildings have been built. * * *<br />

* * * Within another year, the mining company officials say, there<br />

will 'be little left of what was the original b<strong>us</strong>iness section of Hibbing.<br />

Recently fifteen persons residing in the southern end of the b<strong>us</strong>iness<br />

and residential district, the Pillsbury and Southern Additions, and in the<br />

township of <strong>St</strong>untz, j<strong>us</strong>t outside the village, began an action against the<br />

Oliver Company, the Town of Hibbing, and the Mesa'ba Electric Railway<br />

Company, to enjoin the town from disposing of its property in the original<br />

townsite, enjoining the vacation of streets,- enjoining the railways company<br />

from removing its tracks, and enjoining the Oliver Company from doing certain<br />

things which would permit the mining of the northerly forty acres.<br />

They suggested that the Oliver Company purchase their property, but<br />

it has no interest in the ore underlying the Pillsbury or Southern Additions.<br />

The application for a temporary injunction was argued Novemiber 28 and 29,<br />

and was taken under advisement.<br />

An issue of the "<strong>St</strong>. Paul Dispatch," that of September 8, 1920,<br />

stated that $20,000,000 was being expended in the removal of the<br />

town and the building of the new. Other estimates place it at $18,-<br />

000,000. And the "Hibbing Daily News," of July 4, 1920, th<strong>us</strong> tabulated<br />

the cost incurred in removal and new construction :<br />

New b<strong>us</strong>iness buildings $3,000,000<br />

New hotel and hospital 1,00(),(XX)<br />

New power and iheating plant 1.(XK).000<br />

New homes, already constructed or under construction 1,000,000<br />

New school Iniildings 2.^i00,000<br />

Water and sewer mains 650,000<br />

<strong>St</strong>reet grading 450.(XX1<br />

Recreational building 750,000<br />

City hall 500,000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!