1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us
1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us
1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
688 DULUTH AND ST. LOUIS COUNTY<br />
In that year the assessed valuation of Fredenberg Township<br />
was $145,818. It has since scarcely changed, being a few hundred<br />
dollars less in 1919. Taxes in 1904 totaled to $2,945.52; in 1919 the<br />
levy was $5,784.98.<br />
Township officials in 1920: R. T. Williams (chairman), J. A.<br />
Roy and Chas. M. Johnson, supervisors ; F. W. Johnson, clerk<br />
O. H. <strong>St</strong>uberud, assessor; also treasurer.<br />
Population of the township in 1910 was 115; in 1920 it stood<br />
at only eighty-seven. It is, therefore, only sparcely inhabited, yet<br />
it is a separate school district, being in School District No. 38, which<br />
covers two townships, 52-15 (Fredenberg), and 53-15 (unorganized<br />
territory). Township 53-15 had only twenty-seven inhabitants in<br />
1910 and no population was reported to the 1920 cens<strong>us</strong>. There are<br />
four schoolho<strong>us</strong>es in Fredenberg Township, or there were four a<br />
few years ago, but the school report for 1919-20 school year shows<br />
that in District No. 38 there were two frame schoolho<strong>us</strong>es, valued<br />
at $5,000, but as only one teacher was employed during that year,<br />
it is presumed that only one schoolho<strong>us</strong>e was <strong>us</strong>ed. The enrollment<br />
was twenty-two; the teacher was paid $86.00 a month and the tax<br />
R. T.<br />
levy for that year was $4,897.64. School board officials were :<br />
Williams, clerk; F. W. Johnson, treasurer; H. P. <strong>St</strong>uberud, chairman<br />
of directors.<br />
French.—On Saturday, Aug<strong>us</strong>t 26, 1905, "in<br />
story log building known as the French Ho<strong>us</strong>e,<br />
that certain two-<br />
situate on southwest<br />
quarter of southeast quarter, section twenty-three of township<br />
sixty north, range twenty-one west" was held, by order of the<br />
county commissioners the first town meeting of the newly-erected<br />
Township of French, which the county commissioners were influenced<br />
to form by a petition signed by William French, and a majority of<br />
the freeholders of township 60-21.<br />
The petition, which was presented by and sworn to by William<br />
French, stated that at the time it was circulated among the residents<br />
of the township, there were not in excess of forty voters resident in<br />
the territory for which township powers were sought, under chapter<br />
10, of the Laws of the <strong>St</strong>ate of Minnesota, 1894.<br />
The petition was considered and approved by the county commissioners<br />
at their session of Aug<strong>us</strong>t 10, 1905.<br />
French Township assessed valuation in 1905 was $192,774 ; in<br />
1919, it was $64,676. Tax-levy in 1905 was $5,627.74; in 1919 it was<br />
$3,350.62. In 1910, the population was 167; in 1920 it was only<br />
thirty-one.<br />
School District No. 54 embraces only French Township. There<br />
is a schoolho<strong>us</strong>e, valued at $2,400, and a female teacher is employed at<br />
a salary of $95.00 a month, notwithstanding that the enrollment for<br />
the year 1919-20 was two. The school levy in that year was $905.46,<br />
seemingly an expensive method of teaching two pupils. The school<br />
board officials in that year were : Hattie Fritcher, clerk ; Sarah Portugue,<br />
treasurer; W. H. French, chairman of directors.<br />
The officials of French Township in 1920 were : Veder Fritcher,<br />
chairman of supervisors; O. H. Moon, clerk; Wm. H. French,<br />
assessor; A. W. Klofauda, treasurer.<br />
Gnesen.—The Township of Gnesen was organized in 1879. Its<br />
proximity to <strong>Duluth</strong> will eventually make its land valuable, although<br />
up to the present, it cannot be said that its advance has been rapid.<br />
In 1879 its assessed valuation was $32,086, which figure by forty<br />
years of development was increased to $183,218, the valuation of the<br />
;