07.04.2013 Views

1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us

1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us

1921 Duluth & St Louis County MN, Van Brunt.pdf - Garon.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

688 DULUTH AND ST. LOUIS COUNTY<br />

In that year the assessed valuation of Fredenberg Township<br />

was $145,818. It has since scarcely changed, being a few hundred<br />

dollars less in 1919. Taxes in 1904 totaled to $2,945.52; in 1919 the<br />

levy was $5,784.98.<br />

Township officials in 1920: R. T. Williams (chairman), J. A.<br />

Roy and Chas. M. Johnson, supervisors ; F. W. Johnson, clerk<br />

O. H. <strong>St</strong>uberud, assessor; also treasurer.<br />

Population of the township in 1910 was 115; in 1920 it stood<br />

at only eighty-seven. It is, therefore, only sparcely inhabited, yet<br />

it is a separate school district, being in School District No. 38, which<br />

covers two townships, 52-15 (Fredenberg), and 53-15 (unorganized<br />

territory). Township 53-15 had only twenty-seven inhabitants in<br />

1910 and no population was reported to the 1920 cens<strong>us</strong>. There are<br />

four schoolho<strong>us</strong>es in Fredenberg Township, or there were four a<br />

few years ago, but the school report for 1919-20 school year shows<br />

that in District No. 38 there were two frame schoolho<strong>us</strong>es, valued<br />

at $5,000, but as only one teacher was employed during that year,<br />

it is presumed that only one schoolho<strong>us</strong>e was <strong>us</strong>ed. The enrollment<br />

was twenty-two; the teacher was paid $86.00 a month and the tax<br />

R. T.<br />

levy for that year was $4,897.64. School board officials were :<br />

Williams, clerk; F. W. Johnson, treasurer; H. P. <strong>St</strong>uberud, chairman<br />

of directors.<br />

French.—On Saturday, Aug<strong>us</strong>t 26, 1905, "in<br />

story log building known as the French Ho<strong>us</strong>e,<br />

that certain two-<br />

situate on southwest<br />

quarter of southeast quarter, section twenty-three of township<br />

sixty north, range twenty-one west" was held, by order of the<br />

county commissioners the first town meeting of the newly-erected<br />

Township of French, which the county commissioners were influenced<br />

to form by a petition signed by William French, and a majority of<br />

the freeholders of township 60-21.<br />

The petition, which was presented by and sworn to by William<br />

French, stated that at the time it was circulated among the residents<br />

of the township, there were not in excess of forty voters resident in<br />

the territory for which township powers were sought, under chapter<br />

10, of the Laws of the <strong>St</strong>ate of Minnesota, 1894.<br />

The petition was considered and approved by the county commissioners<br />

at their session of Aug<strong>us</strong>t 10, 1905.<br />

French Township assessed valuation in 1905 was $192,774 ; in<br />

1919, it was $64,676. Tax-levy in 1905 was $5,627.74; in 1919 it was<br />

$3,350.62. In 1910, the population was 167; in 1920 it was only<br />

thirty-one.<br />

School District No. 54 embraces only French Township. There<br />

is a schoolho<strong>us</strong>e, valued at $2,400, and a female teacher is employed at<br />

a salary of $95.00 a month, notwithstanding that the enrollment for<br />

the year 1919-20 was two. The school levy in that year was $905.46,<br />

seemingly an expensive method of teaching two pupils. The school<br />

board officials in that year were : Hattie Fritcher, clerk ; Sarah Portugue,<br />

treasurer; W. H. French, chairman of directors.<br />

The officials of French Township in 1920 were : Veder Fritcher,<br />

chairman of supervisors; O. H. Moon, clerk; Wm. H. French,<br />

assessor; A. W. Klofauda, treasurer.<br />

Gnesen.—The Township of Gnesen was organized in 1879. Its<br />

proximity to <strong>Duluth</strong> will eventually make its land valuable, although<br />

up to the present, it cannot be said that its advance has been rapid.<br />

In 1879 its assessed valuation was $32,086, which figure by forty<br />

years of development was increased to $183,218, the valuation of the<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!