The Arcades Project - Operi

The Arcades Project - Operi The Arcades Project - Operi

07.04.2013 Views

Bilanz der preussischen Revolution, in Gesammelte Schrifien von Karl Marx und Friedrich Engels, vol. 3 [Stuttgart, 1902], p. 211.)" [mla,l] In the figure of the dandy, Baudelaire seeks to find some use for idleness, just as leisure once had a use. The vita contemplativa is replaced by something that could be called the vita contemptiva. (Compare part 3 of my manuscript .) [mla,2] Experience is the outcome of work; immediate experience is the phantasmagoria of the idler." [mla,3] In place of the force field that is lost to humanity with the devaluation of experi­ ence, a new field of force opens up in the form of planning. The mass of un­ known uniformities is mobilized against the confirmed multiplicity of the traditional. To "plan" is henceforth possible only on a large scale. No longer on an individual scale-and this means neither fir the individual nor by the individ­ ual. Valery therefore says, with reason: "The long-hatched enterprises, the pro­ found designs of a Machiavelli or a Richelieu, would today have the reliability and value of a good tip on the Stock Exchange." Paul Valery, Oeuvres completes, J « Paris, 1938), p. 30>. [mla,4] The intentional correlate of "immediate experience)) has not always remained the same. In the nineteenth century, it was ('adventure!' In our day, it appears as "fate;' Schicksal. In fate is concealed the concept of the "total experience" that is fatal from the outset. War is its unsurpassed prefiguration. ("I am born German; it is for this I die" -the trauma of birth already contains the shock that is mortal. This coincidence defines "fate:') [mla,S] Would it be empathy with exchange value that first qualifies the human being for a "total experience"? [mla,6] With the trace , a new dimension accrues to "irnmediate experience." It is no longer tied to the expectation of "adventure"; the one who undergoes an experience can follow the trace that leads there. Whoever follows traces must not only pay attention; above all, he must have given heed already to a great many things. (The hunter must know about the hoof of the animal whose trail he is on; he must know the hour when that animal goes to drink; he must know the course of the river to which it tums, and the location of the ford by which he himself can get across.) In this way there comes into play the peculiar configuration by dint of which long experience appears translated into the language of immediate experi­ ence.5 Experiences can, in fact, prove invaluable to one who follows a trace-but experieuces of a particular sort. The hunt is the one type of work in which they function intrinsically. And the hunt is, as work, very primitive. The experiences of one who attends to a trace result only very remotely from any work activity, or are cut off from such a procedure altogether. (Not for nothing do we speak of "fortune hunting.") They have no sequence and no system. They are 00 o -

a product of chance, and have about them the essential interminability that distinguishes the preferred obligations of the idler. The fWldamentally unfinishable collection of things worth knowing, whose utility depends on chance, has its prototype in study. [m2,1] Idleness has little about it that is representative, though it is far more widely exhibited than leisure. The man of the middle class has begun to be ashamed of labor. He to whom leisure no longer means anything in itself is happy to put his idleness on display. [m2,2] The intimate association between the concept of idleness and the concept of study was emboclied in the notion of studio. Especially for the bachelor, the studio becanle a sort of pendant to the boudoir. [m2,3] Student and hunter. The text is a forest in which the reader is hunter. Rustling in the underbrush-tlle idea, skittish prey, the citation-another piece "in the bag." (Not every reader encounters the idea.) [m2a,1] There are two social institutions of which idleness forms an integral part: tl,e news service and nightlife. They require a specific form of work-preparedness. This specific form is idleness. [m2a,2] News service and idleness. Feuilletonist, reporter, photographer constitute a gradation in which waiting around, the "Get ready" succeeded by the "Shoot;' becomes ever more important vis-a.-vis other activities. [m2a,3J What distinguishes long experience from immediate experience is that the former is inseparable from the representation of a eontinnity, a sequence. TI,e accent that falls on inlillediate experience will be the more weighty in proportion as its substrate is remote from the work of the one having the experience-from the work distinguished by the fact that it draws on long experience precisely where, for an outsider, it is at most an inullediate experience that arises. [m2a,4] In feudal society, leisure-freedom from labor-was a recognized privilege. In bourgeois society, it is no longer so. What distinguishes leisure, as feudalism understands it, is that it communicates with two socially important types of behavior. Religious contemplation and court life represented, as it were, the matrices through which the leisure of the grand seigneur, of the prelate, of the warrior could be molded. These attitudes-that of piety no less than that of representation-were advantageous to the poet. His work in tum benefited them, at !east indirectly, insofar as it maintained contact with both the religion and the life at court. (Voltaire was the first of the great literati to break with the church; so much the less did he disdain to secure a place at the court of Frederick the Great.) In feudal society, the leisure of the poet is a recognized privilege. It is only in bourgeois society that the poet becomes an idler. [m2a,5]

Bilanz der preussischen Revolution, in Gesammelte Schrifien von Karl Marx und Friedrich<br />

Engels, vol. 3 [Stuttgart, 1902], p. 211.)" [mla,l]<br />

In the figure of the dandy, Baudelaire seeks to find some use for idleness, just as<br />

leisure once had a use. <strong>The</strong> vita contemplativa is replaced by something that could<br />

be called the vita contemptiva. (Compare part 3 of my manuscript .) [mla,2]<br />

Experience is the outcome of work; immediate experience is the phantasmagoria<br />

of the idler." [mla,3]<br />

In place of the force field that is lost to humanity with the devaluation of experi­<br />

ence, a new field of force opens up in the form of planning. <strong>The</strong> mass of un­<br />

known uniformities is mobilized against the confirmed multiplicity of the<br />

traditional. To "plan" is henceforth possible only on a large scale. No longer on<br />

an individual scale-and this means neither fir the individual nor by the individ­<br />

ual. Valery therefore says, with reason: "<strong>The</strong> long-hatched enterprises, the pro­<br />

found designs of a Machiavelli or a Richelieu, would today have the reliability<br />

and value of a good tip on the Stock Exchange." Paul Valery, Oeuvres completes,<br />

J « Paris, 1938), p. 30>. [mla,4]<br />

<strong>The</strong> intentional correlate of "immediate experience)) has not always remained the<br />

same. In the nineteenth century, it was ('adventure!' In our day, it appears as<br />

"fate;' Schicksal. In fate is concealed the concept of the "total experience" that is<br />

fatal from the outset. War is its unsurpassed prefiguration. ("I am born German;<br />

it is for this I die" -the trauma of birth already contains the shock that is mortal.<br />

This coincidence defines "fate:') [mla,S]<br />

Would it be empathy with exchange value that first qualifies the human being for<br />

a "total experience"? [mla,6]<br />

With the trace , a new dimension accrues to "irnmediate experience." It is<br />

no longer tied to the expectation of "adventure"; the one who undergoes an<br />

experience can follow the trace that leads there. Whoever follows traces must not<br />

only pay attention; above all, he must have given heed already to a great many<br />

things. (<strong>The</strong> hunter must know about the hoof of the animal whose trail he is on;<br />

he must know the hour when that animal goes to drink; he must know the course<br />

of the river to which it tums, and the location of the ford by which he himself can<br />

get across.) In this way there comes into play the peculiar configuration by dint of<br />

which long experience appears translated into the language of immediate experi­<br />

ence.5 Experiences can, in fact, prove invaluable to one who follows a trace-but<br />

experieuces of a particular sort. <strong>The</strong> hunt is the one type of work in which they<br />

function intrinsically. And the hunt is, as work, very primitive. <strong>The</strong> experiences<br />

of one who attends to a trace result only very remotely from any<br />

work activity, or are cut off from such a procedure altogether. (Not for nothing do<br />

we speak of "fortune hunting.") <strong>The</strong>y have no sequence and no system. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

00<br />

o<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!