The Arcades Project - Operi
The Arcades Project - Operi The Arcades Project - Operi
"In the windswept stairways of the Eiffel Tower, or, better still, in the steel sup ports of a Pont Transbordeur, one meets with the fundamental aesthetic experi ence of present-day architecture: through the thin net of iron that hangs suspended in the air, things stream-ships, ocean, houses, masts, landscape, harbor. They lose their distinctive shape, swirl into one another as we climb downward, merge simultaneouslY:' Sigfried Giedion, Bauen in Frankreic!z (Leipzig and Berlin) , p. Z In the same way, the historian today has only to erect a slender but sturdy scaffolding-a philosophic structure-in order to draw the most vital aspects of the past into his net. But just as the magnificent vistas of the city provided by the new construction in iron (again, see Giedion, illustrations on pp. 61-63) for a long time were reserved exclusively for the workers and engi neers, so too the philosopher who wishes here to garner fresh perspectives must be someone immune to vertigo-an independent and, if need be, solitary worker. [N!a,!] The book on the Baroque exposed the seventeenth century to the light of the present day. Here, something analogous must be done for the nineteenth century, but with greater distinctness. [N!a,2] Modest methodological proposal for the cultural-historical dialectic. It is very easy to establish oppositions, according to determinate points of view, widlin the various "fields') of any epoch, such that on one side lies the "productive," '"for ward-looking;' "lively;' "positive" part of the epoch, and on the other side the ahortive, retrograde, and obsolescent. The very contours of the positive element will appear distincdy only insofar as this element is set off against the negative. On the other hand, every negation has its value solely as background for the delineation of the lively, the positive. It is therefore of decisive importance that a new partition be applied to this initially excluded, negative component so that, by a displacement of the angle of vision (but not of the criteria!), a positive element emerges anew in it too-something different from that previously signified. And so on, ad infinitum, until the entire past is brought into the present in a historical apocatastasis." [N!a,3] The foregoing, put differendy: the indestlllctibility of the highest life in all things. Against the prognosticators of decline. Consider, though : Isn't it an affront to Goethe to make a fihn of Faust, and isn't there a world of difference between the poem Faust and the film Faust? Ye s, certainly. But, again, isn't there a whole world of difference between a bad film of Faust and a good one? What matter are never the "great" but only the dialectical contrasts, which often seem indistinguishable from nu,mces. It is nonetheless from them that life is always born anew. [N!a,4] To encompass both Breton and Le Corbusier-that would mean drawing the spirit of contemporary France like a bow, with which knowledge shoots the moment in the heart. [N!a,5]
Marx lays bare the causal connection between economy and culture. For us, what matters is the thread of expression. It is not the economic origins of culture that will be presented, but the expression of the economy in its culture. At issue, in other words, is the attempt to grasp an economic process as perceptible Vi· phenomenon, from out of which proceed all manifestations oflife in the arcades (and, accordingly, in the nineteenth century) . [Nla,6] This research-which deals fundamentally with the expressive character of the earliest industrial products, the earliest industrial architecture, the earliest ma chines, but also the earliest departnlent stores, advertisenlents, and so on-thus becomes important for Marxism in two ways. First, it will demonstrate how the milieu in which Marx's doctrine arose affected that doctrine through its expres sive character (which is to say, not only through causal connections) ; but, second, it will also show in what respects Marxism, too, shares the expressive character of the material products contemporary with it. [Nla,7] Method of this project: literary montage. I needn't say anything. Merely show. I shall purloin no valuables, appropriate no ingenious formulations. But the rags, the refuse-these I will not inventory but allow, in the only way possible, to come into their own: by making use of them. [Nla,8] Bear in mind that commentary on a reality (for it is a question here of commen tary, of interpretation in detail) calls for a method completely different from that required by commentary on a text. In the one case, the scientific mainstay is theology; in the other case, philology. [N2 ,1] It may be considered one of the methodological objectives of this work to demon strate a historical materialism which has annihilated within itself the idea of progress. Just here, historical materialism has every reason to distinguish itself sharply from bourgeois habits of thought. Its founding concept is not progress but actualization. [N2,2] Historical "understanding" is to be grasped, in principle, as an afterlife of that which is understood; and what has been recognized in the analysis of the "after life of works;' in the analysis of "fame;' is therefore to be considered the foundation of history in general. [N2,3] How tlus work was written: rung by rung, according as chance would offer a narrow foothold, and always like someone who scales dangerous heights and never allows himself a moment to look around, for fear of becoming dizzy (but also because he would save for the end the full force of the panorama opening out to him). [N2,4] Overcoming the concept of "progress" and overcoming the concept of "period of decline" are two sides of one and the same thing. [N2,S]
- Page 423 and 424: they also arranged to have outstand
- Page 425 and 426: the next in perspective, offering f
- Page 427 and 428: that sheet of' alluvium, subterrane
- Page 429 and 430: son of the princess. The intimacy o
- Page 431 and 432: M [The FHtueur] A landscape haunts,
- Page 433 and 434: pletely distances himself from the
- Page 435 and 436: on as we would imagine them to do i
- Page 437 and 438: "It is wonderful that in Paris itse
- Page 439 and 440: anonymous engineering, a grade cros
- Page 441 and 442: then ... there was scarcely a tavem
- Page 443 and 444: pavement, so as not to delay the op
- Page 445 and 446: knowing it; yet notlllng is more fo
- Page 447 and 448: was a poor devil whose means forbad
- Page 449 and 450: nomy. The difference between this p
- Page 451 and 452: torrent where you are rolled, buffe
- Page 453 and 454: door is closed. 'Dickens himself ha
- Page 455 and 456: Frontispiece of the third volume of
- Page 457 and 458: ""That poetry of terror which the s
- Page 459 and 460: In Le 6 o(/obn, in Chapter 17, "Le
- Page 461 and 462: Description of the crowd in Baudela
- Page 463 and 464: ary urban culture ... forces us to
- Page 465 and 466: v Which last is a scheme of ' paper
- Page 467 and 468: ahout the same faces, the same appe
- Page 469 and 470: who, in the midst of his wanderings
- Page 471 and 472: [On the Theory of .Knowledge, Theor
- Page 473: down from the arcades in the readin
- Page 477 and 478: condition of technology. The old pr
- Page 479 and 480: identical with the "now of recogniz
- Page 481 and 482: The particular difficulty of doing
- Page 483 and 484: these values originated, but of the
- Page 485 and 486: fonns of appropriate behavior. What
- Page 487 and 488: of the artist reaches back to the p
- Page 489 and 490: The dialectical image is that form
- Page 491 and 492: The archaic form of primal history,
- Page 493 and 494: late, and politics always needs to
- Page 495 and 496: tdalterliche Zeitanschauungen in il
- Page 497 and 498: accentuate the rags of mendicants .
- Page 499 and 500: tive . . , content hy the historica
- Page 501 and 502: The now of recognizability is the m
- Page 503 and 504: Focillon on technique: "It has been
- Page 505 and 506: fills all wanton behavior with fate
- Page 507 and 508: "Hirondelles-women who work the win
- Page 509 and 510: of this decline fuses, as though of
- Page 511 and 512: tated, provoked above all by the lo
- Page 513 and 514: that only the superior strength of
- Page 515 and 516: o o "' this woman from passing beyo
- Page 517 and 518: 8 '" oneself that the woman who at
- Page 519 and 520: could withstand the exorbitant comm
- Page 521 and 522: Should the flower fashions of the B
- Page 523 and 524: 00 o "' "'After the Cafe de Paris c
Marx lays bare the causal connection between economy and culture. For us, what<br />
matters is the thread of expression. It is not the economic origins of culture that<br />
will be presented, but the expression of the economy in its culture. At issue, in<br />
other words, is the attempt to grasp an economic process as perceptible Vi·<br />
phenomenon, from out of which proceed all manifestations oflife in the arcades<br />
(and, accordingly, in the nineteenth century) . [Nla,6]<br />
This research-which deals fundamentally with the expressive character of the<br />
earliest industrial products, the earliest industrial architecture, the earliest ma<br />
chines, but also the earliest departnlent stores, advertisenlents, and so on-thus<br />
becomes important for Marxism in two ways. First, it will demonstrate how the<br />
milieu in which Marx's doctrine arose affected that doctrine through its expres<br />
sive character (which is to say, not only through causal connections) ; but, second,<br />
it will also show in what respects Marxism, too, shares the expressive character of<br />
the material products contemporary with it. [Nla,7]<br />
Method of this project: literary montage. I needn't say anything. Merely show. I<br />
shall purloin no valuables, appropriate no ingenious formulations. But the rags,<br />
the refuse-these I will not inventory but allow, in the only way possible, to come<br />
into their own: by making use of them. [Nla,8]<br />
Bear in mind that commentary on a reality (for it is a question here of commen<br />
tary, of interpretation in detail) calls for a method completely different from that<br />
required by commentary on a text. In the one case, the scientific mainstay is<br />
theology; in the other case, philology. [N2 ,1]<br />
It may be considered one of the methodological objectives of this work to demon<br />
strate a historical materialism which has annihilated within itself the idea of<br />
progress. Just here, historical materialism has every reason to distinguish itself<br />
sharply from bourgeois habits of thought. Its founding concept is not progress<br />
but actualization. [N2,2]<br />
Historical "understanding" is to be grasped, in principle, as an afterlife of that<br />
which is understood; and what has been recognized in the analysis of the "after<br />
life of works;' in the analysis of "fame;' is therefore to be considered the foundation<br />
of history in general. [N2,3]<br />
How tlus work was written: rung by rung, according as chance would offer a<br />
narrow foothold, and always like someone who scales dangerous heights and<br />
never allows himself a moment to look around, for fear of becoming dizzy (but<br />
also because he would save for the end the full force of the panorama opening<br />
out to him). [N2,4]<br />
Overcoming the concept of "progress" and overcoming the concept of "period of<br />
decline" are two sides of one and the same thing. [N2,S]