07.04.2013 Views

The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...

The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...

The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

epresent<strong>at</strong>ives of <strong>the</strong> church of St Lawrence, Rubaldus prepositus <strong>and</strong> magister Johannes<br />

Archidiaconus, received £50 from Ugo Ferrario junior against <strong>the</strong> tax (census) th<strong>at</strong> he was to<br />

collect from <strong>the</strong> possessions of St Lawrence in Acre over a period of one year: `150 nomine<br />

census ecclesie sancti Laurencii quam habemus<br />

in Ancum (sic) ... pro quibus damus et concedimus<br />

tibi plenam et liberam potest<strong>at</strong>em loc<strong>and</strong>i administracionem dicte ecclesie. '50' Clearly, Ugo<br />

Ferrario was in <strong>the</strong> same position as Ottone Giudice twenty years beforeh<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y were both<br />

asked to collect <strong>the</strong> same amount of money per annum (Ottone Giudice was sent in 1200 to<br />

collect 150 bezants, which equals £50), <strong>and</strong> it is hard to avoid <strong>the</strong> impression th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

fulfilling exactly <strong>the</strong> same task. Ottone <strong>and</strong> Ugo even seem to have adopted a similar economic<br />

approach to <strong>the</strong>ir mission to Acre. Like Ottone Giudice, Ugo Ferrario also signed a series of<br />

commenda contracts before his departure from Genoa to <strong>the</strong> kingdom of Jerusalem. 02 Assuming<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> two contracts of 1200 <strong>and</strong> 1222 were indeed for <strong>the</strong> same mission, it is possible to reach<br />

some conclusions. When Ottone was sent to possess <strong>the</strong> ruga of St Lawrence (iuro... quod tenebo<br />

rugam de Sancto Laurentio de Acri) he was in fact sent to collect <strong>the</strong> census, for which he<br />

received wide administr<strong>at</strong>ive rights by <strong>the</strong> church over its own possessions.<br />

It is interesting <strong>and</strong> probably not a coincidence th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> census collected in<br />

Acre was equal to <strong>the</strong> fee th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Embriaci were asked to pay in <strong>the</strong> old contract th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y signed<br />

in 1154, in which <strong>the</strong> Embriaco bro<strong>the</strong>rs were required to pay 1000s or £50 <strong>Genoese</strong> 503 <strong>The</strong><br />

impression is obviously th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> fee paid for Acre remained <strong>the</strong> same from 1154 until 1222. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is, however, a major difference between <strong>the</strong> charter of 1154 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> contracts of 1200 <strong>and</strong> 1222 in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sense th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract from 1154 referred to <strong>the</strong> entire possessions of <strong>the</strong> commune of Genoa<br />

in Acre, while in 1200 it is about <strong>the</strong> census from <strong>the</strong> possessions of <strong>the</strong> church, mainly from <strong>the</strong><br />

ruga of St Lawrence. <strong>The</strong> Embriaco family th<strong>at</strong> was given full ownership of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong><br />

possessions in Acre in 1154 was not in fact collecting <strong>the</strong> revenues from <strong>the</strong>se places in <strong>the</strong> year<br />

1200. <strong>The</strong> census belonged to <strong>the</strong> church of St Lawrence <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> appointment of Ottone Giudice<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Embriaci was perhaps only symbolic. <strong>The</strong> real revenues came to <strong>the</strong> Embriaci through<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir commercial investments independent of <strong>the</strong>ir "ownership" of <strong>the</strong> ruga st Laurentii.<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> was included in <strong>the</strong> ruga of St Lawrence? In <strong>the</strong> following paragraphs it will be<br />

argued th<strong>at</strong> it formed only part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong> quarter, most probably only <strong>the</strong> street of St<br />

Lawrence itself with not more than a dozen buildings. <strong>The</strong>se calcul<strong>at</strong>ions are based on one of <strong>the</strong><br />

most valuable documents existing about <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong> quarter in Acre, a report which was<br />

compiled in Acre in <strong>the</strong> year 1249 <strong>and</strong> which covers a period of two years (1248-9). This report<br />

501 Mag. Sal., no. 550, from 29 September 1222<br />

502 Mag. Sal., nos. 547,549 from 29 September 1200<br />

503 1 Libri lurium, vol. I/I, no, 165, p. 241.<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!