The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...
The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...
The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
epresent<strong>at</strong>ives of <strong>the</strong> church of St Lawrence, Rubaldus prepositus <strong>and</strong> magister Johannes<br />
Archidiaconus, received £50 from Ugo Ferrario junior against <strong>the</strong> tax (census) th<strong>at</strong> he was to<br />
collect from <strong>the</strong> possessions of St Lawrence in Acre over a period of one year: `150 nomine<br />
census ecclesie sancti Laurencii quam habemus<br />
in Ancum (sic) ... pro quibus damus et concedimus<br />
tibi plenam et liberam potest<strong>at</strong>em loc<strong>and</strong>i administracionem dicte ecclesie. '50' Clearly, Ugo<br />
Ferrario was in <strong>the</strong> same position as Ottone Giudice twenty years beforeh<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y were both<br />
asked to collect <strong>the</strong> same amount of money per annum (Ottone Giudice was sent in 1200 to<br />
collect 150 bezants, which equals £50), <strong>and</strong> it is hard to avoid <strong>the</strong> impression th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were<br />
fulfilling exactly <strong>the</strong> same task. Ottone <strong>and</strong> Ugo even seem to have adopted a similar economic<br />
approach to <strong>the</strong>ir mission to Acre. Like Ottone Giudice, Ugo Ferrario also signed a series of<br />
commenda contracts before his departure from Genoa to <strong>the</strong> kingdom of Jerusalem. 02 Assuming<br />
th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> two contracts of 1200 <strong>and</strong> 1222 were indeed for <strong>the</strong> same mission, it is possible to reach<br />
some conclusions. When Ottone was sent to possess <strong>the</strong> ruga of St Lawrence (iuro... quod tenebo<br />
rugam de Sancto Laurentio de Acri) he was in fact sent to collect <strong>the</strong> census, for which he<br />
received wide administr<strong>at</strong>ive rights by <strong>the</strong> church over its own possessions.<br />
It is interesting <strong>and</strong> probably not a coincidence th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> census collected in<br />
Acre was equal to <strong>the</strong> fee th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Embriaci were asked to pay in <strong>the</strong> old contract th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y signed<br />
in 1154, in which <strong>the</strong> Embriaco bro<strong>the</strong>rs were required to pay 1000s or £50 <strong>Genoese</strong> 503 <strong>The</strong><br />
impression is obviously th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> fee paid for Acre remained <strong>the</strong> same from 1154 until 1222. <strong>The</strong>re<br />
is, however, a major difference between <strong>the</strong> charter of 1154 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> contracts of 1200 <strong>and</strong> 1222 in<br />
<strong>the</strong> sense th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract from 1154 referred to <strong>the</strong> entire possessions of <strong>the</strong> commune of Genoa<br />
in Acre, while in 1200 it is about <strong>the</strong> census from <strong>the</strong> possessions of <strong>the</strong> church, mainly from <strong>the</strong><br />
ruga of St Lawrence. <strong>The</strong> Embriaco family th<strong>at</strong> was given full ownership of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong><br />
possessions in Acre in 1154 was not in fact collecting <strong>the</strong> revenues from <strong>the</strong>se places in <strong>the</strong> year<br />
1200. <strong>The</strong> census belonged to <strong>the</strong> church of St Lawrence <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> appointment of Ottone Giudice<br />
by <strong>the</strong> Embriaci was perhaps only symbolic. <strong>The</strong> real revenues came to <strong>the</strong> Embriaci through<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir commercial investments independent of <strong>the</strong>ir "ownership" of <strong>the</strong> ruga st Laurentii.<br />
Wh<strong>at</strong> was included in <strong>the</strong> ruga of St Lawrence? In <strong>the</strong> following paragraphs it will be<br />
argued th<strong>at</strong> it formed only part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong> quarter, most probably only <strong>the</strong> street of St<br />
Lawrence itself with not more than a dozen buildings. <strong>The</strong>se calcul<strong>at</strong>ions are based on one of <strong>the</strong><br />
most valuable documents existing about <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong> quarter in Acre, a report which was<br />
compiled in Acre in <strong>the</strong> year 1249 <strong>and</strong> which covers a period of two years (1248-9). This report<br />
501 Mag. Sal., no. 550, from 29 September 1222<br />
502 Mag. Sal., nos. 547,549 from 29 September 1200<br />
503 1 Libri lurium, vol. I/I, no, 165, p. 241.<br />
138