07.04.2013 Views

The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...

The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...

The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Genoa... marked by... an <strong>at</strong>tempt <strong>at</strong> a reassertion of <strong>the</strong>ir ancient... control over <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong><br />

colony in Acre. '495<br />

When Byrne analysed this documents he was not aware of ano<strong>the</strong>r contract th<strong>at</strong> was<br />

signed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> end of two years between Ottone Giudice <strong>and</strong> Guglielmo Embriaco. Origone did not<br />

mention this contract in her discussion too. In <strong>the</strong> following discussion it will be argued th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

contract from 1200 has to be read in <strong>the</strong> context of o<strong>the</strong>r documents concerning properties in<br />

Acre. <strong>The</strong>se include <strong>the</strong> above mentioned second contract between <strong>the</strong> Embriaci <strong>and</strong> Ottone<br />

Giudice from September 1203, as well as ano<strong>the</strong>r lease contract for <strong>the</strong> church's property in Acre<br />

from 1222. Finally, <strong>the</strong> discussion must also take into consider<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong><br />

report about <strong>the</strong><br />

commune's property in Acre from 1249.<br />

<strong>The</strong> contract from 16 September 1203 is a receipt for <strong>the</strong> actual payment, according to<br />

which <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> end of his service in <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>at</strong>in</strong> <strong>East</strong> Ottone Giudice paid Guglielmo Embriaco £230<br />

5s Od. <strong>The</strong> problem in interpreting this figure is th<strong>at</strong> Guglielmo Embriaco <strong>and</strong> Ottone Giudice<br />

made a series of commercial contracts between <strong>the</strong>m in 1200 in addition to Ottone's appointment<br />

in Acre 496 However, Ottone did specify th<strong>at</strong> £100 5s Od of <strong>the</strong> total sum were `in mediet<strong>at</strong>e<br />

vescontie quam habuit ab eo de rua de Antiochia et de Ultramare. '497 It is not clear wh<strong>at</strong> Ottone<br />

meant in <strong>the</strong> term vescontie. <strong>The</strong> definition of his authority is also not clear, because <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

contract from September 1200 is a little vague. Guglielmo Embriaco maior asked him to collect<br />

<strong>the</strong> income We ruga nostra predicta Sancti Laurentii aut aliunde et de omnibus redditibus<br />

Ultramaris' [my emphasis]. This definition probably referred to Antioch, even though <strong>the</strong> only<br />

time Antioch was explicitly mentioned in <strong>the</strong> initial document was when Ottone was granted<br />

permission to travel <strong>the</strong>re: `si necesse fuerit ire in Antiochiam vel Tripolim aut Gibelletum. '498<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> was included in <strong>the</strong> ruga of St Lawrence? According to Jacoby this term, which usually<br />

means street or road, sometimes refers to an entire quarter. 499<br />

It might be tempting to interpret<br />

ruga sancti Laurentii as <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Genoese</strong> quarter, based on <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 1154 document<br />

<strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Genoese</strong> possessions in Acre were explicitly leased to Nicola <strong>and</strong> Ugo Embriaco:<br />

Votum illud quod comune Ianue habet in Acri et eins pertinentiis, sine contradictione comunis<br />

Ianue et omnium personarum pro eo... ' [my 50°<br />

emphasis]. Such a conclusion, however, would be<br />

wrong. Firstly, <strong>the</strong>re is no o<strong>the</strong>r indic<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Embriaci possessed anything in Acre in this<br />

period. Although <strong>the</strong>y referred to <strong>the</strong> ruga as `ruga nostra' (see above), a contract of 1222<br />

suggests th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were only acting on behalf of <strong>the</strong> church. In 29 September 1222, two<br />

495<br />

Byrne, `<strong>The</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong> Colonies in Syria', p. 155.<br />

496 OS, 1200, cart. 4, p. 252 R4 from 09 September 1200; MS 102, pp. 160-161, from 23 September 1200.<br />

497 GG, 1203, no. 571, from 16 September 1203, pp. 269-270.<br />

498 See above, note 493, pp. 312-313.<br />

499 David Jacoby, `Crusader Acre', p. 30, note, 149.<br />

500 1 Libri lurium, vol. 1/1, no, 165, p. 241.<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!