The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...
The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...
The Crusades, the Genoese and the Latin East - DSpace at ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Genoa... marked by... an <strong>at</strong>tempt <strong>at</strong> a reassertion of <strong>the</strong>ir ancient... control over <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong><br />
colony in Acre. '495<br />
When Byrne analysed this documents he was not aware of ano<strong>the</strong>r contract th<strong>at</strong> was<br />
signed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> end of two years between Ottone Giudice <strong>and</strong> Guglielmo Embriaco. Origone did not<br />
mention this contract in her discussion too. In <strong>the</strong> following discussion it will be argued th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
contract from 1200 has to be read in <strong>the</strong> context of o<strong>the</strong>r documents concerning properties in<br />
Acre. <strong>The</strong>se include <strong>the</strong> above mentioned second contract between <strong>the</strong> Embriaci <strong>and</strong> Ottone<br />
Giudice from September 1203, as well as ano<strong>the</strong>r lease contract for <strong>the</strong> church's property in Acre<br />
from 1222. Finally, <strong>the</strong> discussion must also take into consider<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong><br />
report about <strong>the</strong><br />
commune's property in Acre from 1249.<br />
<strong>The</strong> contract from 16 September 1203 is a receipt for <strong>the</strong> actual payment, according to<br />
which <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> end of his service in <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>at</strong>in</strong> <strong>East</strong> Ottone Giudice paid Guglielmo Embriaco £230<br />
5s Od. <strong>The</strong> problem in interpreting this figure is th<strong>at</strong> Guglielmo Embriaco <strong>and</strong> Ottone Giudice<br />
made a series of commercial contracts between <strong>the</strong>m in 1200 in addition to Ottone's appointment<br />
in Acre 496 However, Ottone did specify th<strong>at</strong> £100 5s Od of <strong>the</strong> total sum were `in mediet<strong>at</strong>e<br />
vescontie quam habuit ab eo de rua de Antiochia et de Ultramare. '497 It is not clear wh<strong>at</strong> Ottone<br />
meant in <strong>the</strong> term vescontie. <strong>The</strong> definition of his authority is also not clear, because <strong>the</strong> initial<br />
contract from September 1200 is a little vague. Guglielmo Embriaco maior asked him to collect<br />
<strong>the</strong> income We ruga nostra predicta Sancti Laurentii aut aliunde et de omnibus redditibus<br />
Ultramaris' [my emphasis]. This definition probably referred to Antioch, even though <strong>the</strong> only<br />
time Antioch was explicitly mentioned in <strong>the</strong> initial document was when Ottone was granted<br />
permission to travel <strong>the</strong>re: `si necesse fuerit ire in Antiochiam vel Tripolim aut Gibelletum. '498<br />
Wh<strong>at</strong> was included in <strong>the</strong> ruga of St Lawrence? According to Jacoby this term, which usually<br />
means street or road, sometimes refers to an entire quarter. 499<br />
It might be tempting to interpret<br />
ruga sancti Laurentii as <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Genoese</strong> quarter, based on <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 1154 document<br />
<strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Genoese</strong> possessions in Acre were explicitly leased to Nicola <strong>and</strong> Ugo Embriaco:<br />
Votum illud quod comune Ianue habet in Acri et eins pertinentiis, sine contradictione comunis<br />
Ianue et omnium personarum pro eo... ' [my 50°<br />
emphasis]. Such a conclusion, however, would be<br />
wrong. Firstly, <strong>the</strong>re is no o<strong>the</strong>r indic<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Embriaci possessed anything in Acre in this<br />
period. Although <strong>the</strong>y referred to <strong>the</strong> ruga as `ruga nostra' (see above), a contract of 1222<br />
suggests th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were only acting on behalf of <strong>the</strong> church. In 29 September 1222, two<br />
495<br />
Byrne, `<strong>The</strong> <strong>Genoese</strong> Colonies in Syria', p. 155.<br />
496 OS, 1200, cart. 4, p. 252 R4 from 09 September 1200; MS 102, pp. 160-161, from 23 September 1200.<br />
497 GG, 1203, no. 571, from 16 September 1203, pp. 269-270.<br />
498 See above, note 493, pp. 312-313.<br />
499 David Jacoby, `Crusader Acre', p. 30, note, 149.<br />
500 1 Libri lurium, vol. 1/1, no, 165, p. 241.<br />
137