MURDER IN ANATOLIA - European Stability Initiative - ESI
MURDER IN ANATOLIA - European Stability Initiative - ESI
MURDER IN ANATOLIA - European Stability Initiative - ESI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
– 26 –<br />
Yelki testified in court on 21 May 2009, now as a suspect. “The accusations are completely<br />
baseless,” he stated. “I do not know Emre Gunaydin and the others.” 173 Later during the<br />
hearing Emre stood up and said, to the surprise of the prosecutors, that “Huseyin Yelki is not<br />
guilty, he is being held in prison for no reason.” When the judges demanded to know why he<br />
had previously implicated Yelki, Emre said he did so because “Yelki was a Christian<br />
missionary.” 174 Yelki was released the same day. The charges against him were dropped. 175<br />
Aral testified as a suspect on 21 August 2009. Once again Emre withdrew his earlier<br />
statements:<br />
“I mentioned Varol Bulent Aral‟s name in order to reduce my sentence. He has nothing<br />
to do with these incidents.” 176<br />
In a bizarre moment, Aral theatrically interrupted Emre, shouting, “I am the number one man<br />
in Ergenekon and I instigated these murders! Let Jesus protect you.” 177<br />
The court decided to drop the charges against Aral, who returned to Adiyaman prison to serve<br />
his prison term. It looked as if this was the end of his role in the Malatya court case. Nobody<br />
expected that over a year later Aral would once again become a key suspect.<br />
g. “I regret some of the things I have done”<br />
In his first statement to prosecutors after his arrest, Emre claimed to have met a mysterious<br />
“researcher” a few months before the murder.<br />
“In late 2006 or early 2007, I think, there was a person whose name I do not know, but<br />
who presented himself as a researcher. He talked about Christianity and missionary work<br />
at my father‟s sports centre. He said that there were churches in Malatya and that they<br />
were financially powerful. I do not know this person, but maybe my father does.” 178<br />
Who was this researcher? An anonymous letter sent by email in the summer of 2007 claimed<br />
that Malatya‟s Protestants had been closely monitored for a long time both by the provincial<br />
gendarmerie and by academics from the Strategic Research Centre (Stratejik Arastirma<br />
Merkezi) of Inonu University in Malatya. 179 The e-mail was addressed to the Association of<br />
Protestant Churches, who forwarded it to the prosecutors. 180 It was signed with a pseudonym.<br />
The unknown author claimed to work for the gendarmerie in Malatya. The letter stated that<br />
173 th<br />
Protocol of the 17 Court Hearing, 21 August 2009, p. 1.<br />
174<br />
Compass Direct, “Efforts to Tie Malatya Murders to „Deep State‟ Fizzle in Turkey – Alleged ring-leader<br />
retracts testimony implicating suspected link to „masterminds‟”; 28 May 2009,<br />
http://www.compassdirect.org/english/country/turkey/4067/.<br />
175 th<br />
Protocol of the 17 Court Hearing, 21 May 2009, p. 9.<br />
176 th<br />
Protocol of the 20 Court Hearing, 21 August 2009, p. 5.<br />
177 th<br />
Protocol of the 20 Court Hearing, 21 August 2009, p. 5.<br />
178<br />
Malatya Indictment, p. 6.<br />
179<br />
Inonu Universitesi Stratejik Arastirmalar Merkezi, <strong>IN</strong>USAM. It is described in its Founding regulations<br />
(Yonetmeligi Kurulus): http://www.inonu.edu.tr/baglanti.php?sayfa=arsmerklink.<br />
180<br />
Until 2009 the Association of Protestant Churches used the name “Alliance” of Protestant Churches.<br />
~ www.esiweb.org ~