06.04.2013 Views

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PHOENIX ISLANDS PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> III. Background, 1. Physical Setting of the Islands<br />

Draft 1 March 2007<br />

In 2002, seawater temperature loggers were deployed at Abariringa (Kanton) (3 sites); Orona<br />

(2 sites); Nikumaroro (2 sites); Manra (1 site); Enderbury (1 site); Rawaki (Phoenix) (1 site)<br />

(Obura and Stone 2003). No temperature loggers were deployed at Birnie.<br />

C. BATHYMETRIC<br />

In 1974, the Committee for Co-ordination of Joint Prospecting for marine resources in the<br />

South Pacific (CCOP/SOPAC) noted that Nauru through the Phoenix Islands to the Line<br />

Islands had the greatest potential for offshore phosphate at depths of 400 m (Teiwaki 1988).<br />

It was recommended that surveys for the phosphate be initiated.<br />

Tiffin (1981) summarized findings of KI-81(3) survey of Kiribati waters for manganese<br />

nodules that were completed from 7 to 17 May 1981. Tiffin (1981) noted that Cruise No. 37<br />

included an area east of the Phoenix Islands. For KI-81(3), four stations were surveyed.<br />

However, based on the cruise track, none appeared to be within the EEZ of the Phoenix<br />

Islands, even though the cruise was titled, “Kiribati Phoenix Islands manganese nodule<br />

survey”.<br />

Teiwaki (1988) noted that there have been several seabed surveys for manganese resources.<br />

These have included surveys by CCOP/SOPAC, Minex, Japan, West German, and the U.S.A.<br />

Teiwaki (1988) noted that only the CCOP/SOPA and Minex surveys were officially<br />

recognized by the Government of Kiribati.<br />

Aslanian et al (1988b) examined cumulative volcano amplitude (CVA) and CVA maxima<br />

related to seamounts in the central Pacific, including the Phoenix Islands. There is a CVA<br />

maximum underlined by flowlines from the Phoenix Islands. The Mid-Cretaceous ridges of<br />

the Phoenix fracture zone intersect flowlines at the biggest and brightest CVA maxima in the<br />

vicinity of Rarotonga and Rurutu. In addition, Phoenix Islands crustal flowlines appeared to<br />

have a role in both the Mehetia and MacDonald CVA maxima, however, cannot be linked to<br />

both hot-spots. Aslanian et al (1988b) concluded that hot-spotting was flawed by errors and<br />

that its application was not age independent.<br />

Cronan et al (1991) reported on manganese (Mn) nodules in the EEZ around the Phoenix<br />

Islands (see also Cronan 1987; Kinoshita and Tiffin 1993; JICA et al 2005; see Figure III-<br />

1.19). These were based on Japanese cruises (Glasby 2002). The highest abundance (>25<br />

kg/m 2 ) was in a small area around 5 0 S, 170 0 W (Cronan et al 1991; on the southern Phoenix<br />

Islands area according to Cronan and Hodkinson 1989 and 1991). On the northern area,<br />

abundance was less than 5 kg/m 2 (Cronan 1987), but nickel (Ni) and copper (Cu) content was<br />

high in the north and decreased towards the south (see also Cronan and Hodkinson 1989 and<br />

1991). Cobalt (Co) grades were generally low overall. Average Co content was 0.83 percent<br />

(Cronan and Hodkinson 1989 and 1991).<br />

Figure III-1.19. The abundance of nodules in the EEZ around the Phoenix Islands<br />

(Source: Cronan et al 1991 and Cronan and Hodkinson 1989 and 1991).<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!