06.04.2013 Views

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PHOENIX ISLANDS PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> II. Methodology<br />

Draft 1 March 2007<br />

2) Environment and Conservation Department (ECD), MELAD,<br />

3) Attorney General’s Office,<br />

4) Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development (MFMRD),<br />

5) Kiribati National Tourism Office,<br />

6) USP Research Centre,<br />

7) Ministry of Line and Phoenix Islands Development (MLPID),<br />

8) Kiribati Police Service,<br />

9) Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration,<br />

10) Ministry of Finance and Economic Development.<br />

A one page questionnaire was developed to solicit opinions from the owner of the Phoenix<br />

Islands, the Government of Kiribati. The questionnaire was distributed in August 2006 to<br />

Phoenix Islands Steering Committee members. Follow-up discussions were held with<br />

relevant ministries and departments. A copy of this questionnaire is attached (see Attachment<br />

1). Responses from opinion surveys (see <strong>Chapter</strong> IV) provided part of the basis for<br />

development of management priorities and proposed actions.<br />

C. FOREIGN STAKEHOLDERS<br />

Do we still want to forward a questionnaire to foreign stakeholders? If so, any suggestions<br />

for format?<br />

Foreign stakeholder inputs – Many global environmental conservation groups have interest<br />

in the conservation of pristine natural areas such as the Phoenix Islands. Relevant<br />

international conservation organizations (CI, IUCN, TNC, TOC, <strong>SPREP</strong>, etc.) will be briefed<br />

regarding the PIPA’s development. In addition, they will be approached for their views,<br />

perspectives, and wants and desires regarding the management of the PIPA. Their insights<br />

and inputs are important. However, priority or lead agencies for this work are: GOK, NEAq,<br />

and CI.<br />

- other stakeholders are users of the resource (dwfn) when to close 60 or 200nm. Would be<br />

useful to have their concerns noted in order to address them – loss in fishing ground (Govt<br />

can allocate another site or increase catch quota or fishing days, etc – MFMRD can assist)<br />

4. CRITICAL ISSUES<br />

Based on the background summaries and the stakeholder inputs, various critical issues were<br />

identified and summarized in <strong>Chapter</strong> V on Critical Issues.<br />

5. ALTERNATIVE MANAGEMENT APPROACHES<br />

The critical issues identified in <strong>Chapter</strong> V provided the foundation from which alternative<br />

management approaches were developed (see <strong>Chapter</strong> VI).<br />

6. SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND APPROACHES<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!