06.04.2013 Views

Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Function in Smooth Muscle - Physiological ...

Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Function in Smooth Muscle - Physiological ...

Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Function in Smooth Muscle - Physiological ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

120 SUSAN WRAY AND THEODOR BURDYGA<br />

Many of the features that led to the postulation of a<br />

specialized space and environment between the SR and<br />

plasma membrane will also hold for regions between the<br />

SR and other organelles.<br />

4. Superficial buffer barrier<br />

Van Breemen and colleagues (713, 715) hypothesized<br />

<strong>in</strong> the 1980s that there is a subplasmalemmal doma<strong>in</strong> that<br />

is functionally separated from the cytosolic constituents<br />

by the superficial SR and that this would be important <strong>in</strong><br />

modulat<strong>in</strong>g Ca signal<strong>in</strong>g and force production <strong>in</strong> smooth<br />

muscle. This peripheral SR, be<strong>in</strong>g so close to the sites of<br />

Ca entry, would act to scavenge and buffer extracellular<br />

Ca entry. This buffer<strong>in</strong>g ability would be overcome dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agonist stimulation or depolarization but could act to help<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> rest<strong>in</strong>g [Ca] low between stimuli. Follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stimulation, the superficial SR will release Ca back to the<br />

plasma membrane Ca extrusion mechanisms. Because of<br />

the difficulty of directly measur<strong>in</strong>g [Ca] <strong>in</strong> microdoma<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

direct experimental support for them was lack<strong>in</strong>g. However,<br />

with the advent of near-membrane Ca <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

(170, 809), evidence support<strong>in</strong>g or consistent with the<br />

superficial buffer barrier role of the SR <strong>in</strong> smooth muscles<br />

has been provided <strong>in</strong> a variety of preparations [vascular<br />

(587, 713), gastric (754), bladder (789), uterus (631, 793)].<br />

The sites on the SR of Ca release and uptake dur<strong>in</strong>g these<br />

processes may be functionally and spatially separate<br />

(635). The estimates of subplasmalemma [Ca] have been<br />

between 10 and 50 M [gastric (170), colonic (77), arterial<br />

(809)], and the elevations of [Ca] last up to 100–200 ms<br />

(339).<br />

Inhibition of SERCA <strong>in</strong>creases bulk Ca signals produced<br />

<strong>in</strong> response to agonists, which is consistent with<br />

the superficial buffer barrier hypothesis. Bradley et al.<br />

(77) calculated that the buffer accounted for b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

50% of the Ca enter<strong>in</strong>g colonic myocytes. Recently however,<br />

this group has argued that the SR should be viewed<br />

more as a “Ca trap” and that SERCA activity cannot<br />

curtail the rise of cytosolic [Ca] but rather contributes to<br />

its decl<strong>in</strong>e when efflux ends (451; see also Ref. 635).<br />

Although not generally considered <strong>in</strong> accounts of<br />

smooth muscle microdoma<strong>in</strong>s, a role for calmodul<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

contribut<strong>in</strong>g to localiz<strong>in</strong>g Ca signals has been proposed<br />

(764). This arises from the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that, even at low [Ca],<br />

a specific “contractile” pool of calmodul<strong>in</strong> with zero or<br />

two of its four Ca-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g sites occupied is tightly bound<br />

to the contractile mach<strong>in</strong>ery. Local changes of [Ca] near<br />

the myofilaments could then activate this specific calmodul<strong>in</strong><br />

pool by saturat<strong>in</strong>g the four Ca-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g sites to activate<br />

myos<strong>in</strong> light-cha<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ase (MLCK) and cause contraction,<br />

while more distant local [Ca] changes need not<br />

be associated with contraction (764).<br />

E. SR and the Mitochondria<br />

Physiol Rev VOL 90 JANUARY 2010 www.prv.org<br />

Both EM and confocal imag<strong>in</strong>g studies have shown<br />

the SR and mitochondrial membranes to be <strong>in</strong> very close<br />

proximity (175, 677). The distance between them may be<br />

as small as 10 nm (515). As with caveolae, the SR may<br />

appear to engulf mitochondria, and thereby create a specialized<br />

space for Ca signal<strong>in</strong>g, discussed below. Although<br />

close association between ER and mitochondria has been<br />

described <strong>in</strong> other cell types (489, 561), few have reported<br />

the almost complete envelop<strong>in</strong>g, which appears to be a<br />

feature of smooth muscles. This aspect has been exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> detail at the EM level by Dai et al. (140) <strong>in</strong> pig<br />

tracheal muscle. At rest, all (99.4%) mitochondria were<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 30 nm of SR membrane, and the average distance<br />

was 22 nm. The majority (82%) of mitochondria were<br />

completely encircled or enwrapped by the SR network.<br />

The regions of close contact lacked the regular spac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sometimes seen between SR and plasma membrane, but<br />

specific anchors have been suggested <strong>in</strong> other cell types<br />

(175, 241).<br />

What makes the above data particularly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

that the association of mitochondria and SR changed with<br />

acetylchol<strong>in</strong>e (ACh) stimulation. The number of mitochondria<br />

surrounded by SR fell to 12%, and fewer were <strong>in</strong><br />

close contact. The authors suggest the SR unwraps from<br />

mitochondria with stimulation and extends more <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

cytoplasm. These structural arrangements between SR<br />

and mitochondria have been reported <strong>in</strong> Mad<strong>in</strong>-Darby<br />

can<strong>in</strong>e kidney (MDCK) II cells, but it is elevated [Ca] that<br />

keeps the close association and between them and low<br />

[Ca] causes dissociation (735). Lateral movements of mitochondria<br />

relative to the SR of up to 3 m/s have been<br />

reported <strong>in</strong> neuroblastoma cells (405).<br />

1. Mitochondria and smooth muscle Ca signal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

There is now a large amount of literature on mitochondrial<br />

Ca signal<strong>in</strong>g and the <strong>in</strong>teractions between the<br />

SR and mitochondria. It is beyond the scope of this review<br />

to assess all the literature on mitochondrial Ca signal<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

but we will give an account of recent data <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

SR-mitochondrial signal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> smooth muscle. The follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

reviews provide a good perspective on this area (296,<br />

451, 565).<br />

Mitochondrial Ca uptake has enjoyed a resurgence of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest (53) largely accounted for by new techniques<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g for monitor<strong>in</strong>g their role <strong>in</strong> Ca signal<strong>in</strong>g and the<br />

weight of accumulated evidence show<strong>in</strong>g that Ca uptake<br />

occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g physiological conditions (e.g., Refs. 49, 159,<br />

590). Due to the low aff<strong>in</strong>ity of their Ca transporter (46),<br />

the capacity of mitochondria to rapidly accumulate Ca<br />

was considered only relevant dur<strong>in</strong>g pathologically high<br />

[Ca]. That there could be microdoma<strong>in</strong>s of high [Ca]<br />

around mitochondria, to which the SR (or ER) would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!