06.04.2013 Views

Role of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Arterial Contraction: Comparison ...

Role of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Arterial Contraction: Comparison ...

Role of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Arterial Contraction: Comparison ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

858 Circulation Research Vol 62, No 4, April 1988<br />

TABLE 1. Contractile Responses to Various Stimuli <strong>in</strong> Rat Aorta and Bov<strong>in</strong>e Tail Artery<br />

A. Maximal contractions <strong>in</strong> response to potassium-depolarization, norep<strong>in</strong>ephr<strong>in</strong>e, i<br />

and caffe<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Maximum contraction amplitude (mg tension + SEM)<br />

Treatment<br />

100 mM K solution<br />

6X 10~ 3 M Norep<strong>in</strong>cphr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

10 mM Caffe<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Rat aorta<br />

1,508 + 206 (6)<br />

1,090 ±433 (4)<br />

158±12 (14)<br />

Bov<strong>in</strong>e tail<br />

artery<br />

1,313±237(7)<br />

678+163(6)<br />

61 ±17 (5)<br />

Bov<strong>in</strong>e tail<br />

artery/rat aorta<br />

0.87<br />

0.62<br />

0.39<br />

B. Rate <strong>of</strong> tension <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> 0-calcium, low-sodium solution<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> tension <strong>in</strong>crease (mg tension/hr + SEM)<br />

Bov<strong>in</strong>e tail<br />

Bov<strong>in</strong>e tail<br />

Treatment<br />

Rat aorta<br />

artery<br />

artery/rat aorta<br />

Control<br />

None<br />

None<br />

10 ^M Ryanod<strong>in</strong>e<br />

n, number <strong>in</strong> parentheses.<br />

205 ±12 (3)<br />

38+14 (3)<br />

0.19<br />

The contractile responses <strong>of</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery to<br />

potassium-rich solutions, to brief pulses <strong>of</strong> NE, and<br />

to caffe<strong>in</strong>e are illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figures 8 and 9; the data<br />

are compared with rat aorta <strong>in</strong> summarized form<br />

<strong>in</strong> Table 1A. Potassium-<strong>in</strong>duced contractions <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e<br />

tail artery were comparable to those <strong>in</strong> rat<br />

aorta: they were almost completely abolished<br />

by 10 u,M verapamil (Figure 8) but were unaffected<br />

by ryanod<strong>in</strong>e (Figure 9). Further, a small external<br />

calcium-dependent fraction <strong>of</strong> the response persisted<br />

<strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> verapamil. In contrast, the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> verapamil on NE-<strong>in</strong>duced contractions<br />

were different <strong>in</strong> the two vessels. On average,<br />

NE-<strong>in</strong>duced bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery contractions were<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibited by 82 ± 8% (SEM, n = 6) as compared with<br />

45 ±2% (n = 4) <strong>in</strong> rat aorta. Conversely, ryanod<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibited NE-<strong>in</strong>duced contractions by only about<br />

14 ± 3% (n = 6) <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery (Figure 9) but by<br />

about 52 ±2% (n = 8) <strong>in</strong> rat aorta (see Figure 4). In<br />

bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery, caffe<strong>in</strong>e elicited brief, small contractions<br />

(Figure 9 and Table 1A), followed by<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ed relaxation (Figure 9). As <strong>in</strong> rat aorta,<br />

ryanod<strong>in</strong>e blocked the <strong>in</strong>itial caffe<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>in</strong>duced contraction<br />

but did not affect the subsequent relaxation<br />

200 mg<br />

NE<br />

10" 6 M<br />

FIGURE 6. Effect <strong>of</strong> 10 \iM ryanod<strong>in</strong>e on the norep<strong>in</strong>ephr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(NE) response. In this experiment, unlike others with the rat<br />

aortic r<strong>in</strong>gs (see text), tissue was superfused with 10 "* M NE<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously for periods <strong>in</strong>dicated by bars under contraction<br />

records. Tissue was exposed to 10 p.M ryanod<strong>in</strong>e for 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

before record on right-hand side was obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Rest<strong>in</strong>g tension,<br />

500 mg.<br />

(Figure 9). Note that <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery, the average<br />

amplitude <strong>of</strong> the caffe<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>in</strong>duced contractions was<br />

less than 5% <strong>of</strong> that <strong>in</strong>duced by high potassium but was<br />

about 10% <strong>of</strong> the average potassium-<strong>in</strong>duced contraction<br />

<strong>in</strong> rat aorta.<br />

When sodium-dependent calcium extrusion was<br />

suppressed by superfus<strong>in</strong>g 0-calcium, 1.2-mMsodium<br />

solution, bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery exhibited qualitatively<br />

the same response to ryanod<strong>in</strong>e as did rat aorta<br />

(Figure 3): a progressive <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> tension, with<br />

rapid relaxation when the standard (139.2 mM)<br />

sodium medium was re<strong>in</strong>troduced. However, the rate<br />

at which this tension developed was much slower <strong>in</strong><br />

the bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery than <strong>in</strong> rat aorta (Table IB). This<br />

observation, as well as the smaller contractile response<br />

to caffe<strong>in</strong>e and the smaller ryanod<strong>in</strong>e-sensitive<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the NE contraction, <strong>in</strong>dicates that the<br />

bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery has a relatively small SR store <strong>of</strong><br />

calcium as compared with rat aorta. These data imply<br />

that most <strong>of</strong> the "activator calcium" <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e tail<br />

artery comes from the extracellular fluid.<br />

Morphology and Morphometry <strong>of</strong> Rat Aortic and<br />

Bov<strong>in</strong>e Tail Artery Cells<br />

The 15 arterial myocytes from each species that<br />

were analyzed morphometricalry were a representative<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> the population. These cells appeared<br />

relaxed and did not exhibit swollen vacuoles or other<br />

artifacts.<br />

In overall structure, rat aortic cells (Figure 10)<br />

differed markedly from those <strong>of</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery<br />

(Figures 11 and 12). As described by others, 31 the rat<br />

cells were roughly cuboidal and ranged from about<br />

3 x 7 to 10 x 15 ^m <strong>in</strong> size (Figure 10). SR and rough<br />

endoplasmic reticulum (dist<strong>in</strong>guished by the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> ribosomes on the surfaces <strong>of</strong> the latter) as well as<br />

mitochondria were abundant and were distributed<br />

throughout the cytoplasm.<br />

Bov<strong>in</strong>e tail artery cells were sp<strong>in</strong>dle shaped and<br />

much larger: 10-15 jim <strong>in</strong> diameter and usually more<br />

than 100 \im <strong>in</strong> length (Figure 12, light microscopy<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that most cells were about 10—15 x 125-150<br />

Downloaded from<br />

http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on April 6, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!