06.04.2013 Views

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As Christopher Kosciuk notes,<br />

66<br />

Paul L. Manata © 2011<br />

[G]iven this view of things, I think Scotus must conclude that the<br />

relationship of essentially ordered co-­‐causality between the human will<br />

<strong>and</strong> the divine will in producing a particular human volition is of the<br />

second, participative kind, that of instrumental cause to first cause. In<br />

other words, God must be seen as causing the very act of causality by<br />

which the human will produces its volition. The problem with this solution<br />

is that it renders impossible the libertarian view of human freedom. 92<br />

We saw libertarians rejecting this view as inconsistent with ultimate sourcehood<br />

in section 3. And since God is co-­‐causing things in accord with his unchangeable<br />

purposes for all things, it is hard to see how we get alternative possibilities either.<br />

One resort might be to appeal to the Boethian solution, but that will be subject to<br />

the traditional responses. 93 An unchangeable timeless knowledge that Penny will<br />

eat pizza tomorrow seems just as troublesome for Penny’s ability to avoid this<br />

action.<br />

Regarding Scotus’s saving of contingency, Douglas Langston writes,<br />

According to Scotus, not only must God directly will the existence of the<br />

actions of agents who are not free, but he must also directly will the<br />

actions of free agents . . . God determines what acts of free agents are<br />

actual, <strong>and</strong> these actions are contingent because God could will other<br />

actions than those he in fact wills. Nevertheless, these actions would not<br />

seem to be free since no free agent can act otherwise than as God wills.<br />

gets “incomprehensible,” Medieval Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2007), p.<br />

245.<br />

92 Christopher Kosciuk, Human <strong>Free</strong>dom, in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist<br />

Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge <strong>and</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Will</strong>, (U<br />

Mass-­‐Amherst, diss. 2010), p. 137.<br />

93 For example, see David Widerker, "A problem for the Eternity Solution,"<br />

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Volume 29, Number 2 / April, 1991.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!