Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
As Christopher Kosciuk notes,<br />
66<br />
Paul L. Manata © 2011<br />
[G]iven this view of things, I think Scotus must conclude that the<br />
relationship of essentially ordered co-‐causality between the human will<br />
<strong>and</strong> the divine will in producing a particular human volition is of the<br />
second, participative kind, that of instrumental cause to first cause. In<br />
other words, God must be seen as causing the very act of causality by<br />
which the human will produces its volition. The problem with this solution<br />
is that it renders impossible the libertarian view of human freedom. 92<br />
We saw libertarians rejecting this view as inconsistent with ultimate sourcehood<br />
in section 3. And since God is co-‐causing things in accord with his unchangeable<br />
purposes for all things, it is hard to see how we get alternative possibilities either.<br />
One resort might be to appeal to the Boethian solution, but that will be subject to<br />
the traditional responses. 93 An unchangeable timeless knowledge that Penny will<br />
eat pizza tomorrow seems just as troublesome for Penny’s ability to avoid this<br />
action.<br />
Regarding Scotus’s saving of contingency, Douglas Langston writes,<br />
According to Scotus, not only must God directly will the existence of the<br />
actions of agents who are not free, but he must also directly will the<br />
actions of free agents . . . God determines what acts of free agents are<br />
actual, <strong>and</strong> these actions are contingent because God could will other<br />
actions than those he in fact wills. Nevertheless, these actions would not<br />
seem to be free since no free agent can act otherwise than as God wills.<br />
gets “incomprehensible,” Medieval Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2007), p.<br />
245.<br />
92 Christopher Kosciuk, Human <strong>Free</strong>dom, in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist<br />
Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge <strong>and</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Will</strong>, (U<br />
Mass-‐Amherst, diss. 2010), p. 137.<br />
93 For example, see David Widerker, "A problem for the Eternity Solution,"<br />
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Volume 29, Number 2 / April, 1991.