Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5<br />
Paul L. Manata © 2011<br />
of Calvinism scares me; I'm not sure how to distinguish him from the devil.” 2<br />
Respected theologians <strong>and</strong> philosophers David Baggett <strong>and</strong> Jerry Walls claim RT<br />
suggests that God is worse than a hideous earthy dictator who “tortures babies,”<br />
<strong>and</strong> they also fly “violently in the face of some of our clearest <strong>and</strong> deepest moral<br />
intuitions.” 3 The highly regarded <strong>Will</strong>iam Lane Craig remarks that “on this view<br />
God is not only the cause of sin <strong>and</strong> evil, but becomes evil Himself, which is<br />
absurd. By the same token, all human responsibility for sin has been removed.” 4<br />
These remarks are not solely the complaints of contemporary Christians. Going<br />
back to John Wesley we see similar concerns, for example, in his sermon titled<br />
“<strong>Free</strong> Grace,” Wesley remarks that the above <strong>Reformed</strong> doctrines “represent the<br />
high God . . . as more cruel, false, <strong>and</strong> unjust than the devil!” 5 Going back further<br />
to the Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina, the above doctrines purportedly show<br />
that “God’s justice with respect to the wicked vanishes, <strong>and</strong> a manifest cruelty<br />
<strong>and</strong> wickedness is discerned in God.” 6 It is clear from this representative sample<br />
that many find these <strong>Reformed</strong> teachings intolerable.<br />
I will make a few remarks about the above quotes. First, the term ‘Calvinism’ is<br />
used a lot. Outside the <strong>Reformed</strong> tradition ‘Calvinism’ <strong>and</strong> ‘<strong>Reformed</strong> theology’<br />
are often co-‐referring in that they both refer to the <strong>Reformed</strong> Teachings<br />
mentioned above, i.e., RT. I will explain below how I am using the term<br />
‘<strong>Reformed</strong> theology.’ Second, the above quotes should not be brushed off as<br />
2 See , last<br />
accessed 7/1/11.<br />
3 David Baggett <strong>and</strong> Jerry Walls, Good God: The Theistic Foundations of <strong>Moral</strong>ity<br />
(Oxford University Press, 2011,) pp. 74, 78.<br />
4 <strong>Will</strong>iam Lane Craig, “Response to Paul Kjoss Helseth,” in Four Views on Divine<br />
Providence, eds. Stanley N. Gundry <strong>and</strong> Dennis Jowers (Zondervan, 2011), p. 61.<br />
5 See < http://wesley.nnu.edu/john-‐wesley/the-‐sermons-‐of-‐john-‐wesley-‐1872-‐<br />
edition/sermon-‐128-‐free-‐grace/>, last accessed 7/1/11.<br />
6 Luis De Molina, On Divine Foreknowledge: Part IV of the Concordia, trans. Alfred J.<br />
Freddoso (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988), vii. p. 139.