Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.3 Agent causation<br />
47<br />
Paul L. Manata © 2011<br />
But still, libertarianism may look like a sketchy position. To some people it looks<br />
like libertarians are saying that there is no cause at all for why they choose or act<br />
the way they do. Would not this make their choices or actions the result of<br />
accidents or luck? But libertarians deny that just any cause of an action is<br />
freedom removing. It is only certain kinds of causes: the kind that rule out<br />
alternative possibilities, ultimate sourcehood, or both. But other kinds of causes<br />
are acceptable. 51 What are they? Here, the field is divided among libertarians. 52<br />
There are many answers libertarians give for why we choose <strong>and</strong> act the way we<br />
do, but here’s the most popular among Christian thinkers (though there is not<br />
unanimous agreement): our actions are not uncaused, they are caused by us. We<br />
are the cause of our own actions, the buck stops with us. We choose according to<br />
reasons, though those reasons do not necessitate, <strong>and</strong> God, who is the paradigm<br />
example of someone who has agent-‐causal powers, has given us these powers. 53<br />
This view is called the agent-‐causal view. J.P. Morel<strong>and</strong> expressed this view<br />
above, when he wrote: “For libertarians it is only if agents are the first causes or<br />
unmoved movers that agents have the control necessary for freedom.” Morel<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> Craig put it more elaborately:<br />
Real freedom requires a type of control over one’s action—<strong>and</strong>, more<br />
importantly, over one’s will—such that, given a choice to do A (raise one’s<br />
h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> vote) or B (leave the room), nothing determines that either<br />
51 And not all libertarians even agree with this.<br />
52 See R<strong>and</strong>olph Clarke, “Incompatibilist (Non-‐determinist) Theories of <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Will</strong>,”<br />
in SEP, < http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-‐theories/>, last<br />
accessed 7/18/11.<br />
53 For a libertarian perspective against the tight connection many theological<br />
libertarians draw between God’s freedom <strong>and</strong> ours, see Timothy O’Connor,<br />
“<strong>Free</strong>dom with a Human Face,” available online: , last accessed 7/18/11.