06.04.2013 Views

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 Agent causation<br />

47<br />

Paul L. Manata © 2011<br />

But still, libertarianism may look like a sketchy position. To some people it looks<br />

like libertarians are saying that there is no cause at all for why they choose or act<br />

the way they do. Would not this make their choices or actions the result of<br />

accidents or luck? But libertarians deny that just any cause of an action is<br />

freedom removing. It is only certain kinds of causes: the kind that rule out<br />

alternative possibilities, ultimate sourcehood, or both. But other kinds of causes<br />

are acceptable. 51 What are they? Here, the field is divided among libertarians. 52<br />

There are many answers libertarians give for why we choose <strong>and</strong> act the way we<br />

do, but here’s the most popular among Christian thinkers (though there is not<br />

unanimous agreement): our actions are not uncaused, they are caused by us. We<br />

are the cause of our own actions, the buck stops with us. We choose according to<br />

reasons, though those reasons do not necessitate, <strong>and</strong> God, who is the paradigm<br />

example of someone who has agent-­‐causal powers, has given us these powers. 53<br />

This view is called the agent-­‐causal view. J.P. Morel<strong>and</strong> expressed this view<br />

above, when he wrote: “For libertarians it is only if agents are the first causes or<br />

unmoved movers that agents have the control necessary for freedom.” Morel<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Craig put it more elaborately:<br />

Real freedom requires a type of control over one’s action—<strong>and</strong>, more<br />

importantly, over one’s will—such that, given a choice to do A (raise one’s<br />

h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> vote) or B (leave the room), nothing determines that either<br />

51 And not all libertarians even agree with this.<br />

52 See R<strong>and</strong>olph Clarke, “Incompatibilist (Non-­‐determinist) Theories of <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Will</strong>,”<br />

in SEP, < http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-­‐theories/>, last<br />

accessed 7/18/11.<br />

53 For a libertarian perspective against the tight connection many theological<br />

libertarians draw between God’s freedom <strong>and</strong> ours, see Timothy O’Connor,<br />

“<strong>Free</strong>dom with a Human Face,” available online: , last accessed 7/18/11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!