06.04.2013 Views

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

45<br />

Paul L. Manata © 2011<br />

But libertarians do not need to deny the above. They can heartily affirm that<br />

there are many cases where morally responsible people act <strong>and</strong> cannot do<br />

otherwise. This doesn’t contradict libertarianism though. For the libertarian<br />

claims that if a person is morally responsible for some action he could not avoid,<br />

then he must be morally responsible for putting himself in that position. Take the<br />

drunk. He may be responsible for killing someone in an auto accident even<br />

though he could not do otherwise at the time <strong>and</strong> was not in control of his<br />

actions, but this is only because he is morally responsible for putting himself in<br />

that position. Before he decided to drink, he had a choice, <strong>and</strong> he had an open<br />

future. He could have stayed home; he could have had a 7-­‐Up. If it is claimed that<br />

he was an alcoholic <strong>and</strong> could not avoid drinking, then this just pushes the<br />

question back to when he made the libertarian free choices that eventually led to<br />

his alcoholism. The idea here is that morally responsible people must be the<br />

ultimate source <strong>and</strong> originators of their actions or in forming <strong>and</strong> setting their<br />

wills or character. As J. P. Morel<strong>and</strong> has put it, “We all seem to be aware of the<br />

fact that we are the absolute originators of our actions,” <strong>and</strong> that “For<br />

libertarians it is only if agents are the first causes or unmoved movers that agents<br />

have the control necessary for freedom.” 48<br />

5.2 Frankfurt libertarians<br />

At this point there’s some disagreement among libertarians. Some libertarians,<br />

called Frankfurt libertarians, 49 claim that the relevant factor required for moral<br />

responsibility is that the agent be the ultimate source of her actions, whether or<br />

not they have alternative possibilities available to them. They are libertarians<br />

48 J. P. Morel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Scott B. Rae, Body & Soul: Human Nature <strong>and</strong> the Crisis of Ethics<br />

(IVP Academic, 2000), pgs. 132 <strong>and</strong> 128, respectively.<br />

49 Some influential Frankfurt libertarians are: David Hunt (the philosopher),<br />

Eleonore Stump, Linda Zagzebski, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Will</strong>iam Lane Craig.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!