Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Reformed Theology - Analytic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
28<br />
Paul L. Manata © 2011<br />
determinism. 40 But given the confessional statements <strong>and</strong> their explications,<br />
conjoined with our definition of determinism, <strong>Reformed</strong> theology is<br />
deterministic. Call this ‘determinism simpliciter,’ if you like.<br />
Thus, while Taylor <strong>and</strong> Kane’s definitions are fairly broad, that is to their credit.<br />
Notice that these definitions do not commit a <strong>Reformed</strong> determinist to some<br />
specific model of determinism. The <strong>Reformed</strong> confessions seem to rule out at<br />
least some models of determinism. For example, chapter nine of the Westminster<br />
Confession reads: “God hath endued the will of man with that natural liberty, that<br />
it is neither forced, nor, by any absolute necessity of nature, determined to good,<br />
or evil.” Even regarding causal determinism, the idea that every event is<br />
necessitated by antecedent events or conditions, our definition doesn’t commit<br />
one to a specific model of causal determinism. For instance, it need not commit<br />
the <strong>Reformed</strong> Christian to any sort of mechanistic, natural or physical causation,<br />
which would add in natural laws to the above definition of causal determinism.<br />
As John Feinberg points out,<br />
Though some think determinism in the physical world also applies to<br />
human action, it is dubious that it does. Moreover, it is critical to<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> that Calvinistic determinists with respect to human actions do<br />
not mean by determinism the sort that operates in the natural world.<br />
Because Calvinist determinists are not postulating that physical<br />
determinism governs human actions, objections to Calvinist determinists<br />
that misconstrue it as physical determinism are simply misguided <strong>and</strong> in<br />
40 The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Collier-‐MacMillan, 1967) Vol. 2 cites numerous<br />
forms of determinism: (i) ethical determinism, (ii) logical determinism, (iii)<br />
theological determinism, (iv), physical determinism, (v) psychological determinism,<br />
pp. 372–373; but there’s more, e.g., (vi) causal determinism, <strong>and</strong> (vii) teleological<br />
determinism, <strong>and</strong> each of these sub-‐sets of determinisms admits of sub-‐sets of<br />
models.