06.04.2013 Views

A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF HYMENOPHYLLACEAE

A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF HYMENOPHYLLACEAE

A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF HYMENOPHYLLACEAE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Ebihara et al.: A taxonomic revision of Hymenophyllaceae<br />

ferum (L.) Ebihara & Dubuisson, comb. nov. [based on Trichomanes pyxidiferum L. (1753) 1098];<br />

P. vieillardii (Bosch) Ebihara & K. Iwats., comb. nov. [based on Trichomanes vieillardii Bosch (1861c)<br />

90]; P. werneri (Rosenst.) Ebihara & K. Iwats., comb. nov. [based on Trichomanes werneri Rosenst.<br />

(1908a) 35].<br />

Other species:<br />

Polyphlebium venosum (R.Br.) Copel.<br />

5. VANDENBOSCHIA<br />

Vandenboschia Copel. (1938b) 51. — Trichomanes L. subg. Vandenboschia (Copel.) Allan (1961)<br />

34. — Type: Vandenboschia radicans (Sw.) Copel.<br />

Distribution — Throughout the tropics, extending to northern temperate regions;<br />

more than 15 species.<br />

Habitat — Hemi-epiphytic on tree trunks or epilithic, occasionally terrestrial.<br />

Chromosome base number — x = 36.<br />

Note — Corresponding to the Va clade in Ebihara et al. (submitted). Our molecular<br />

analysis shows Copeland’s genus Vandenboschia evidently of polyphyletic origin – he<br />

included species of at least four different lineages (the Va, Po, PT, NT clades in Ebihara<br />

et al., submitted). Vandenboschia, in the present system, refers to V. radicans, type of<br />

Vandenboschia, and its relatives. Nakaike (1975) advocated the application of the generic<br />

name Lacosteopsis instead of Vandenboschia on the grounds that Vandenboschia<br />

was an invalid generic name since Copeland (1938b) included the type of an existing<br />

genus (T. scandens) when he established Vandenboschia (T. Nakaike, pers. comm.). This<br />

confusion was attributed to the controversial typification of Trichomanes as noted above.<br />

Recent nomenclatural conservation of T. crispum against T. scandens (Greuter et al.,<br />

2000) denied the claim that Vandenboschia is an illegitimate name (Morton, 1968;<br />

Holttum, 1976).<br />

KEY TO THE SUBGENERA<br />

1a. Blades bipinnate or more finely divided, hemi-epiphytic or epilithic . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Subg. Vandenboschia<br />

b. Blades simply pinnate, hemi-epiphytic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Subg. Lacosteopsis<br />

1. Subgenus Vandenboschia<br />

Rhizomes short- or long-creeping, irregularly branching, rather thick, to 1.7 mm diam.,<br />

densely covered with brown to bright brown multicellular hairs, protostele reduced,<br />

cortex heterogeneous, roots numerous and robust. Stipes 1–16 cm long, clustered or<br />

irregularly distanced. Blades bipinnate to 5-pinnatifid, ovate to linear-ovate, 40 by<br />

20 cm, venation anadromous, false veinlets absent, laminae often reduced, regular<br />

arrangement of elongate cells observed in some species, internal cell walls various<br />

(thin to thick, straight to coarsely pitted). Sori paratactic, tubular to campanulate, lips<br />

sometimes dilate, receptacles long-exserted.<br />

Distribution — Throughout the tropics, extending to northern temperate regions;<br />

more than 15 species.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!