North Kerry Waxcap Survey 2012 - the Northern Ireland Fungus Group
North Kerry Waxcap Survey 2012 - the Northern Ireland Fungus Group
North Kerry Waxcap Survey 2012 - the Northern Ireland Fungus Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Methodology<br />
The 1:50,000 OSi maps were studied as were aerial photographs available on Google Earth<br />
and (even better) <strong>the</strong> OSi SmartMaps Viewer available at http://shop.osi.ie/shop/. As with <strong>the</strong><br />
West Donegal <strong>Survey</strong> (Mitchel, 2009), ano<strong>the</strong>r key dataset examined in advance was <strong>the</strong><br />
Environmental Protection Agency’s National Soils database (https://maps.epa.ie). Earlier<br />
analysis of <strong>the</strong> waxcap surveys funded by <strong>the</strong> Heritage Council against soil type identified <strong>the</strong><br />
soil types more likely to support waxcaps (Table 4).<br />
IFS SOIL type Description No Records<br />
AminSRPT Podzols – Peaty 423<br />
AminDW Acid Brown Earths – Brown Podzolics 131<br />
BminSW Renzinas / Lithosols Basic 128<br />
AminSW Lithosols / Regosols Acidic 103<br />
MarSands Beach sands and gravels 86<br />
AminPD Surface Water Gleys, ground water Gleys, Acidic 85<br />
Made Man made soils 43<br />
AeoUND Aeolian undifferentiated 41<br />
AminPDPT Peaty gleys, acidic 24<br />
BktPt Blanket peat 23<br />
BminDW Grey Brown Podzolic Brown Earths, Basic 15<br />
AminSP Shallow Surface or Ground water Gleys Acidic 14<br />
BminPD Surface Water Gleys, ground water Gleys, Basic 6<br />
BminSP Shallow Surface or Ground water Gleys Basic 4<br />
AlluvMIN Mineral Alluvium 4<br />
Table 4: National Soil Database soil categories and number of grassland fungi records from<br />
<strong>the</strong> Co.Clare (2006), West Cork (2007) and West Mayo (2008) surveys<br />
From this, <strong>the</strong> preference for better drained mineral soils compared to <strong>the</strong> wetter gleys or<br />
blanket peats is marked. National soil datasets are however relatively broad scale and do take<br />
<strong>the</strong> local complexities of soils into account and this is <strong>the</strong> scale at which fungal mycelia operate.<br />
However, with <strong>the</strong> limitations in mind and if taken at a broad scale, such maps can help target<br />
possible new sites and <strong>the</strong> identification of possible sites using <strong>the</strong> soils map helped<br />
significantly in finding new sites.<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r useful datasets used were Geology available from <strong>the</strong> GSI website and <strong>the</strong> Gardens<br />
dataset of <strong>the</strong> National Inventory of Architectural Heritage (http://www.buildingsofireland.ie).<br />
The latter dataset was also digitised allowing <strong>the</strong>m to be plotted in GIS for identifying possible<br />
large estate lawns and included <strong>the</strong>m in site search planning. All churches marked on <strong>the</strong><br />
1:50,000 maps were also digitised in a new layer to highlight <strong>the</strong>ir presence.<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r incredibly useful datasource is Google StreetView. This is particulary comprehensive<br />
in <strong>Ireland</strong> and allowed me to view <strong>the</strong> sites in advance eliminating sites that were too wet or<br />
churchyards with no lawn. Without this targeting, this survey would be a lot more difficult with<br />
more spent driving than on <strong>the</strong> ground.<br />
Using all <strong>the</strong>se datasets, <strong>the</strong> most likely sites within each 10km square were identified and<br />
driving routes for each survey day were planned in advance. Each site was visited for as long<br />
as was necessary. Whilst <strong>the</strong> target groups were searched for as priority, all species of fungi<br />
encountered were recorded. However many of <strong>the</strong>se latter records were of a casual nature<br />
and many of <strong>the</strong> species maps produced for <strong>the</strong>se species are very unrepresentative as <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were only recorded if seen and were often not searched for.<br />
12