05.04.2013 Views

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STEPHEN BRUNET<br />

in fact, if Manius was an obscure term and therefore unfamiliar to<br />

many Romans. Echion's other comments in the same passage reveal him<br />

to be a fan of gladiatorial shows and well versed in the arcane terminology<br />

of the arena. It is unlikely then that Petronius' imaginary spectacle<br />

included both dwarfs and female gladiators. Yet even if we were to accept<br />

Scheffer's emendation, the text cann t be taken to mean that<br />

Petronius envisioned the dwarfs being matched against the woman<br />

scheduled to fight as an essedarius.<br />

2. Juvenal's conclusion that the natural order of the world had been<br />

overturned because a woman named Mevia was in the habit of killing<br />

Tuscan boars and holding spears in her right hand with her breast uncovered<br />

(1.22-23). Juvenal's example of a Roman matron gone wild cannot<br />

be traced to any particular incident. Juvenal certainly envisaged this<br />

woman being costumed like an Amazon. as may have been the women<br />

who participated in Domitian's Saturnalia. Those women. however,<br />

fought as gladiators, while Mevia appeared as a venator. Also unprovable<br />

is Ville's proposal that Juvenal had directly modeled Mevia on<br />

the women who appeared in the arena during the reign of Nero. 43 Ville<br />

may be right, but we possess no evidence that Nero required these<br />

women to adopt the bare-breasted costume that made Mevia's performance<br />

so distinctive. Nor do we know if these women even fought<br />

venatores. Given what little Dio and Tacitus say on the subject. it is<br />

equally likely that they performed as gladiators. Finally, Dio (66.25.2) is<br />

quite clear that the status of the female venatores in Titus' games was<br />

not particularly high, and so Titus' use of female gladiators was unlikely<br />

to have sparked Juvenal's indignation. Yet, while we may not be<br />

able to trace the events that inspired Juvenal's Amazonian huntress, we<br />

can say with some certainty that Juvenal did not believe that Roman matrons<br />

appeared in the arena on a regular basis. One must keep in mind<br />

that all of Juvenal's statements in this section are characterized by extreme<br />

hyperbole. Thus. in Juvenal's opinion, it was as unlikely that a<br />

woman like Mevia would become a venator as that a eunuch would<br />

marry or the lowly Crispinus rise to a position of wealth (1.22-29). Of<br />

course. such aberrations happened. but they were rare and extreme<br />

events.<br />

3· Juvenal's complaint that Roman matrons practice wrestling and play<br />

at being gladiators, going through their gladiatorial training in full armor<br />

and a heavy helmet (6.246-267). Unlike 1.22-23. Sat. 6 is not concerned<br />

with women who appeared in the arena. Juvenal, in fact. consid-<br />

tyricon(RomeI975)on45·7.<br />

43 Ville (above. n. 7) 259 n. 69. 263.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!