OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...
OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...
OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
[54 STEPHEN BRUNET<br />
I. Historical References (listed chronologically: all dates are A.D.)<br />
I. The report in Dio (61.17.3-4) and Tacitus (Ann. 15.32.3) that Nero<br />
induced women of the highest rank to debase themselves in the arena. It<br />
is not clear if their disgrace took the form of performing as gladiators.<br />
fighting as venatores. or both. Tacitus does not address the point. and<br />
while fighting as gladiators and hunting animals are both included in<br />
Dio's list of the many shows in which upper-class men and women performed.<br />
it would have been helpful if he ha been more explicit about<br />
whether women took part in all the entertainments staged by Nero. Dio<br />
and Tacitus are also not as clear as we might like regarding how Nero<br />
obtained the participation of noblewomen. and they even seem at first<br />
to be somewhat at odds on this question. 30 Dio notes that some of the<br />
men and women who publicly disgraced themselves did so unwillingly.<br />
while the participation of others was voluntary (61.17.3). Tacitus opts<br />
for the view that coercion. albeit of a very su tie form. was the principle<br />
that underlay the participation in Nero's games by members of the<br />
upper class. This is not apparent from 15.32.3. where he says nothing<br />
about the process by which noblewomen were led to appear in the<br />
arena. But in 14.14.6 he notes that Nero induced various members of the<br />
equestrian order to contract their services as gladiators (operas arenae<br />
promittere) by the offer of huge rewards and then comments that they<br />
really had no choice in the matter since such rewards were tantamount<br />
to an order when they came from as powerful a person as Nero. In the<br />
end Dio probably would have agreed with Tacitus' assessment that free<br />
choice was largely an illusion in an environment where the emperor<br />
was desperate to cloak his own desire to perform publicly by making<br />
others do the same. Particularly telling is his description of how many<br />
members of the Roman nobility desperately practiced whatever theatrical<br />
art they could so that they had some form of entertainment to offer<br />
Nero when asked and could in this way avoid eing assigned to sing in<br />
his choruses (61.19.2-3). We are thus left to wonder if the same situation<br />
obtained for many or all of the women who. according to Dio. fought in<br />
the arena voluntarily. On the surface their participation may have been<br />
voluntary since Nero did not have to order them to perform. but in a<br />
true sense they would never have performed publicly of their own accord.<br />
The most important disagreement between the two authors. however.<br />
is over the date of Nero's misdeed. Dio co nects it with the games<br />
given in 59 upon Agrippina's death, while Tacitus attributes it to 63. Yet<br />
there are good reasons to think that this discrepancy arose because<br />
30 On the means used by various emperors to have members of the senatorial<br />
and equestrian orders appear in their games. see Ville (above. n. 7) 261.