05.04.2013 Views

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[54 STEPHEN BRUNET<br />

I. Historical References (listed chronologically: all dates are A.D.)<br />

I. The report in Dio (61.17.3-4) and Tacitus (Ann. 15.32.3) that Nero<br />

induced women of the highest rank to debase themselves in the arena. It<br />

is not clear if their disgrace took the form of performing as gladiators.<br />

fighting as venatores. or both. Tacitus does not address the point. and<br />

while fighting as gladiators and hunting animals are both included in<br />

Dio's list of the many shows in which upper-class men and women performed.<br />

it would have been helpful if he ha been more explicit about<br />

whether women took part in all the entertainments staged by Nero. Dio<br />

and Tacitus are also not as clear as we might like regarding how Nero<br />

obtained the participation of noblewomen. and they even seem at first<br />

to be somewhat at odds on this question. 30 Dio notes that some of the<br />

men and women who publicly disgraced themselves did so unwillingly.<br />

while the participation of others was voluntary (61.17.3). Tacitus opts<br />

for the view that coercion. albeit of a very su tie form. was the principle<br />

that underlay the participation in Nero's games by members of the<br />

upper class. This is not apparent from 15.32.3. where he says nothing<br />

about the process by which noblewomen were led to appear in the<br />

arena. But in 14.14.6 he notes that Nero induced various members of the<br />

equestrian order to contract their services as gladiators (operas arenae<br />

promittere) by the offer of huge rewards and then comments that they<br />

really had no choice in the matter since such rewards were tantamount<br />

to an order when they came from as powerful a person as Nero. In the<br />

end Dio probably would have agreed with Tacitus' assessment that free<br />

choice was largely an illusion in an environment where the emperor<br />

was desperate to cloak his own desire to perform publicly by making<br />

others do the same. Particularly telling is his description of how many<br />

members of the Roman nobility desperately practiced whatever theatrical<br />

art they could so that they had some form of entertainment to offer<br />

Nero when asked and could in this way avoid eing assigned to sing in<br />

his choruses (61.19.2-3). We are thus left to wonder if the same situation<br />

obtained for many or all of the women who. according to Dio. fought in<br />

the arena voluntarily. On the surface their participation may have been<br />

voluntary since Nero did not have to order them to perform. but in a<br />

true sense they would never have performed publicly of their own accord.<br />

The most important disagreement between the two authors. however.<br />

is over the date of Nero's misdeed. Dio co nects it with the games<br />

given in 59 upon Agrippina's death, while Tacitus attributes it to 63. Yet<br />

there are good reasons to think that this discrepancy arose because<br />

30 On the means used by various emperors to have members of the senatorial<br />

and equestrian orders appear in their games. see Ville (above. n. 7) 261.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!