05.04.2013 Views

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

OUSEION - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

224 BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES ENDUS<br />

A so-called Index Verborum is not what we conventionally understand<br />

by that term. but rather a listing of some. but not all. Greek words<br />

and phrases discussed in the commentary. most but not all of which occur<br />

in the text of Konon. Despite uncertain criteria of selection it is<br />

much superior to both the Index Locorum and the General Index. The<br />

former makes no attempt to list any of the cited inscriptions in Greek.<br />

including linear B. and in Near Eastern languages. A random two-way<br />

check reveals a very high rate of inaccuracy. Four notes (on 14.2-3.25.1,<br />

34.7-9 and 46.7-9) cite a total of 54 Greek or Latin passages. of which<br />

only 14 appear in the Index Locorum. For four authors (Ephoros.<br />

Sophocles. Thucydides. Virgil) 8 out of 48 citations in the index are erroneous.<br />

The General Index suffers from arbitrariness and/or inadvertence.<br />

Why is one character indexed while another from the same sentence<br />

is not (e.g. Agamemnon but not lphigeneia at Z6.13-15)? Why<br />

index Dionysos Melanaigis. who is expunged from the text. but not Dionysos<br />

Melanthides. who is retained? An entire paragraph on 26.13-15<br />

escapes both general index and Index Locorum. Further examples<br />

would be tedious. The bibliography. much less error-ridden. is limited<br />

to monographs except for a couple of anomalous entries from serials.<br />

Much labour has gone into this instant landmark in Kononic studies<br />

which. despite the vitiating elements on which this review concentrates.<br />

will have its value as a resource and stimulus. Although Brown makes<br />

the customary claim to responsibility for all errors. there are other parties<br />

with some responsibility to the scholarly consumer of this expensive<br />

book. The title-page lists a roster of eminent editors for Saur's Beitrage<br />

zur Altertumskunde. Do they actually edit? Publication was<br />

financially abetted by the Fonds fur Altertumswissenschaft. Zurich.<br />

What scholarly standards guide its beneficence?<br />

RORYB. EGAN<br />

DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS<br />

UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA<br />

WINN1PEG. MB R3T 2M8<br />

SUSAN TREGGIARI. Roman Social History. Classical Foundations.<br />

London/New York: Routledge. 2002. Pp. 170. $23.95<br />

(pb). ISBN 0-415-19521-7 (hb); 0-415-19522 (pb).<br />

Voici un petit livre qui devrait figurer dans tous les plans de cours en<br />

histoire romaine au niveau du Ie" cycle universitaire. Parseme de<br />

conseils pratiques sur la methode 11 employer. les etapes 11 suivre et les

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!