05.04.2013 Views

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Colchester: <strong>the</strong> mechanics of lay<strong>in</strong>g out a town Philip Crummy<br />

The Roman colony at Colchester was not laid out on open<br />

ground as a s<strong>in</strong>gle planned entity, but was formed by<br />

adapt<strong>in</strong>g a redundant legionary fortress (Fig 53; Crummy<br />

1977; 1982a). The process of conversion was extensive <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>volved considerable build<strong>in</strong>g work. The legionary defences<br />

were filled <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> a new street grid was set out on <strong>the</strong><br />

east side at a slightly different angle, so that it covered <strong>the</strong><br />

area of <strong>the</strong> legionary annexe <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern half of <strong>the</strong><br />

fortress. The via pr<strong>in</strong>cipalis <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> north-south streets to<br />

<strong>the</strong> west of it appear to have been reta<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> colony.<br />

The via sagularis was also kept, except on <strong>the</strong> east side of<br />

<strong>the</strong> fortress where it was replaced by a new street built over<br />

<strong>the</strong> levelled legionary defences. The area of <strong>the</strong> annexe<br />

seems to have been given over partly, if not entirely, to<br />

public build<strong>in</strong>gs. Four are known here: <strong>the</strong> Temple of<br />

Claudius, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>atre, <strong>and</strong> at least two o<strong>the</strong>rs, one <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sula<br />

29 <strong>and</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r, perhaps a large basilica, <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sula 30. The<br />

last two build<strong>in</strong>gs had pre-Boudican forerunners, discovered<br />

<strong>and</strong> partly exam<strong>in</strong>ed by Hull who felt that <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

both public <strong>in</strong> character (Hull 1960, 310, 316). Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to Hull, <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sula 30 probably conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

columns 3ft (lm) wide which were covered with fluted<br />

stucco. It is not certa<strong>in</strong> if <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>atre is <strong>the</strong> one referred to<br />

by Tacitus when he wrote about <strong>the</strong> strange occurrences <strong>in</strong><br />

Colchester shortly before <strong>the</strong> Boudican revolt (Annals,<br />

xiv.32). The rema<strong>in</strong>s of a pre-Boudican <strong>the</strong>atre may lie<br />

underneath, although no trace of this was noted dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

small exploratory excavations of 1981 (Crummy 1982b).<br />

At a recent excavation <strong>in</strong> Culver Street <strong>the</strong> pre-<br />

Boudican rema<strong>in</strong>s proved most important (Rankov 1982,<br />

371). On <strong>the</strong> east side of <strong>the</strong> via pr<strong>in</strong>cipalis were found <strong>the</strong><br />

corners of two large build<strong>in</strong>gs whose size <strong>and</strong> position are<br />

consistent with those of tribunes’ houses. They were<br />

separated by a narrow, well-gravelled street c 6m across.<br />

The walls were built of timber posts set <strong>in</strong> construction<br />

trenches up to c lm deep. The build<strong>in</strong>gs had been<br />

demolished <strong>and</strong> an east-west street of <strong>the</strong> new grid was<br />

laid on top on a slightly different alignment. Timberframed<br />

houses were built along <strong>the</strong> frontages of <strong>the</strong> new<br />

street <strong>and</strong> were destroyed <strong>in</strong> 60/l. In contrast to this<br />

sequence, <strong>the</strong> centurial blocks, situated to <strong>the</strong> west of <strong>the</strong><br />

via pr<strong>in</strong>cipalis, survived until <strong>the</strong> revolt.<br />

About two-thirds of <strong>the</strong> eighteen or so military build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

recognized so far <strong>in</strong> Colchester were destroyed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

fire. This fact, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> number of streets which<br />

were reused, suggests that a substantial proportion of <strong>the</strong><br />

military build<strong>in</strong>gs must have survived <strong>the</strong> change from<br />

fortress to town. Probably <strong>the</strong>re would have been <strong>in</strong>sufficient<br />

space with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> former fortress for all <strong>the</strong> large<br />

civic build<strong>in</strong>gs which <strong>the</strong> first colonists required; <strong>the</strong><br />

defences were <strong>the</strong>refore levelled <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> annexe<br />

was given over primarily to <strong>the</strong>m. This would expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise puzzl<strong>in</strong>g statement by Tacitus, ‘It seemed easy<br />

to destroy <strong>the</strong> settlement; for it had no walls. That was a<br />

matter which Roman comm<strong>and</strong>ers, th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of amenities<br />

78<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than needs, had neglected’ (Annals, xiv.32). The<br />

‘amenities’ must be <strong>the</strong> group of public build<strong>in</strong>gs which,<br />

as already expla<strong>in</strong>ed, would only have been laid out after<br />

<strong>the</strong> defences had been levelled. Excavations at Balkerne<br />

Lane have confirmed Tacitus’s statement that <strong>the</strong> colony<br />

was unprotected <strong>in</strong> 60, because it was found that houses<br />

burnt <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> revolt had been constructed over <strong>the</strong> levelled<br />

military defences <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>se defences were not<br />

replaced until after <strong>the</strong> fire (Crummy 1977, 96).<br />

The destruction of <strong>the</strong> military bank <strong>and</strong> ditch was a<br />

mistake which was not repeated when, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-<br />

Boudican period, o<strong>the</strong>r fortresses were converted <strong>in</strong>to<br />

towns. At Gloucester (Hurst 1972), L<strong>in</strong>coln (Jones 1980),<br />

<strong>and</strong> Exeter (Bidwell 1979; 1980) where much is now<br />

known about <strong>the</strong>ir early development, <strong>the</strong> legionary<br />

defences were reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> towns were <strong>in</strong>itially held<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circuits of <strong>the</strong>ir military ramparts.<br />

At Colchester, <strong>the</strong> fate of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipia is not known.<br />

Perhaps it was reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> colony to fulfil some civic<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative purpose or perhaps it was demolished <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> via decumana <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> via praetoria jo<strong>in</strong>ed up to form a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous east-west street. The street to <strong>the</strong> west of <strong>the</strong><br />

via pr<strong>in</strong>cipalis was later to replace it as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> northsouth<br />

street of <strong>the</strong> town. The date of this change is<br />

unclear, but it probably occurred just after <strong>the</strong> Boudican<br />

revolt when <strong>the</strong> colony was provided with its first defences<br />

<strong>and</strong> gates.<br />

The process of convert<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fortress <strong>in</strong>to a town may<br />

have taken several years. The evidence for this comes from<br />

three places: (i) <strong>the</strong> Temple of Claudius; (ii) <strong>the</strong> backfill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>the</strong> legionary ditch; (iii) <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>atre.<br />

It has been argued that <strong>the</strong> Temple of Claudius could<br />

not have been started until after <strong>the</strong> death of Claudius <strong>in</strong><br />

54 (Fishwick 1972). S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sula conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> temple<br />

is apparently <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant feature of <strong>the</strong> eastern grid <strong>and</strong><br />

clearly an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of its layout, <strong>the</strong>n ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> grid<br />

was set out no earlier than 54 or, before this date, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sula<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ed only an altar as, for example, at Lyons <strong>and</strong><br />

Cologne.<br />

The legionary defences at Balkerne Lane had been<br />

much neglected before be<strong>in</strong>g levelled. Debris had been<br />

tipped <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> butt ends of <strong>the</strong> ditch, pits dug on its<br />

<strong>western</strong> side, <strong>and</strong> at least one build<strong>in</strong>g, probably a<br />

workshop, had been built up aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn butt end<br />

so that it encroached onto <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> street. S<strong>in</strong>ce no<br />

military comm<strong>and</strong>er would have tolerated such treatment<br />

of his defences, <strong>the</strong> bank <strong>and</strong> ditch must have been <strong>in</strong>tact<br />

for some time after <strong>the</strong> evacuation of <strong>the</strong> garrison<br />

(Crummy 1977, 76).<br />

The <strong>western</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>atre appears to overlie <strong>the</strong><br />

levelled defences of <strong>the</strong> fortress (Fig 53). Moreover, it is<br />

not on <strong>the</strong> alignment of <strong>the</strong> eastern street grid as might be<br />

expected, but shares <strong>the</strong> same alignment as <strong>the</strong> fortress.<br />

These two facts seem to <strong>in</strong>dicate that between <strong>the</strong><br />

destruction of <strong>the</strong> defences <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lay<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!