05.04.2013 Views

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Todd: Forum <strong>and</strong> Capitolium <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early <strong>Empire</strong><br />

Fig 50 Virunum: <strong>the</strong> forum <strong>and</strong> temple<br />

that <strong>the</strong> double prec<strong>in</strong>ct forum orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> Italy <strong>and</strong> that<br />

it was transmitted <strong>the</strong>nce <strong>in</strong>to neighbour<strong>in</strong>g prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

areas. The available dat<strong>in</strong>g evidence for <strong>the</strong> transfer is not<br />

impressive, but so far as it goes it is reasonably consistent.<br />

None of <strong>the</strong> known examples outside <strong>the</strong> Italian pen<strong>in</strong>sula<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Cisalp<strong>in</strong>a) is Augustan. One (Iader) may be<br />

Julio-Claudian. Conimbriga <strong>and</strong> perhaps Virunum are<br />

Flavian. St Bertr<strong>and</strong>-de-Comm<strong>in</strong>ges <strong>in</strong> its visible form<br />

(Fig 51) <strong>and</strong> Paris (Duval 1961, 131-8) are probably<br />

Trajanic. Amiens <strong>and</strong> Bavai are later, probably Hadrianic<br />

or early Anton<strong>in</strong>e. The most familiar, <strong>and</strong> most widely<br />

illustrated, of <strong>the</strong> Gallic fora, that of Augusta Raurica, is<br />

64<br />

most probably early Anton<strong>in</strong>e or Hadrianic at <strong>the</strong> earliest,<br />

though it must surely have replaced a monumental layout<br />

of <strong>the</strong> 1st century AD or even earlier. There is little<br />

evidence as yet that <strong>the</strong> double prec<strong>in</strong>ct forum was<br />

widespread <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>and</strong> central Gaul <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1st century<br />

AD <strong>and</strong> it is <strong>the</strong>refore not surpris<strong>in</strong>g that it had so little<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>the</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g of Romano-British fora <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Flavian period <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 2nd century (Frere 1978,<br />

276). What is more <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, perhaps, is <strong>the</strong> fact that no<br />

British forum is known to have been later embellished by<br />

<strong>the</strong> addition of a temple prec<strong>in</strong>ct or even by <strong>the</strong> erection of<br />

a temple with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> forum piazza. The Verulamium forum<br />

resembles <strong>the</strong> Gallic double prec<strong>in</strong>ct type <strong>in</strong> some respects,<br />

but it was not a fully developed <strong>in</strong>stance (Frere<br />

1983, 59-69). It is, of course, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three lst-century<br />

coloniae of Camulodunum, L<strong>in</strong>dum, <strong>and</strong> Glevum that<br />

more elaborate plans might be expected, but as yet <strong>the</strong><br />

evidence is too fragmentary for certa<strong>in</strong>ty to be atta<strong>in</strong>able.<br />

Recent work at L<strong>in</strong>coln suggests that <strong>the</strong> forum here could<br />

Fig 51 St Bertr<strong>and</strong>-de-Comm<strong>in</strong>ges: <strong>the</strong> forum <strong>and</strong> temple

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!