05.04.2013 Views

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

ROMAN URBAN TOPOGRAPHY in Britain and the western Empire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Marsden: London <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3rd <strong>and</strong> 4th centuries<br />

Fig 74 London: collapsed roof tiles from <strong>the</strong> east w<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> dwell<strong>in</strong>g adjacent to <strong>the</strong> small bath build<strong>in</strong>g at Bill<strong>in</strong>gsgate;<br />

probably early 5th century<br />

appropriate <strong>in</strong> that century. A m<strong>in</strong>t was operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>re<br />

until about 326, <strong>and</strong> it was <strong>the</strong> seat of <strong>the</strong> Bishop <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

recently established Church. At some time <strong>the</strong> city was<br />

renamed Augusta, presumably <strong>in</strong> recognition of services;<br />

<strong>and</strong>, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> late 4th-century Notitia Dignitatum,<br />

<strong>the</strong> officer <strong>in</strong> charge of <strong>the</strong> Treasury was located <strong>in</strong><br />

London, even though <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>t had closed down more<br />

than half a century earlier.<br />

The late Roman defences have provided a wealth of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about what must have been an overrid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

problem dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> latter half of <strong>the</strong> 4th century - attacks<br />

from barbarian raiders. These defences have been considered<br />

<strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> several recent publications <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

conclusions are merely summarized here (Maloney 1983,<br />

104-17). The first h<strong>in</strong>t of a problem may be <strong>the</strong> construction<br />

of a defended watch tower at Shadwell, probably <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> late 3rd century. A riverside defensive wall was next<br />

built <strong>in</strong> London, which <strong>in</strong> places conta<strong>in</strong>ed reused stones<br />

<strong>and</strong> elsewhere did not. Much of <strong>the</strong> wall was constructed<br />

on a foundation of chalk <strong>and</strong> oak piles (Fig 72)) <strong>and</strong> had a<br />

carefully-built superstructure of unused ragstone, but at<br />

<strong>the</strong> west end, at Blackfriars, <strong>the</strong>re was no such foundation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> superstructure conta<strong>in</strong>ed many reused carved<br />

106<br />

stones from demolished religious build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> monuments<br />

(Fig 73). Maloney has argued that <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong><br />

construction can be accounted for by different gangs of<br />

builders work<strong>in</strong>g with materials from different sources.<br />

The present writer, however, has argued that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

probably reflect two dist<strong>in</strong>ct build<strong>in</strong>g phases, <strong>the</strong> first <strong>in</strong><br />

which <strong>the</strong>re was access to <strong>the</strong> ragstone quarries <strong>in</strong> Kent,<br />

<strong>the</strong> second, perhaps much later, when this was no longer<br />

possible <strong>and</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city were demolished to<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> materials. It is agreed that two phases of<br />

defensive wall existed on <strong>the</strong> waterfront at <strong>the</strong> south-east<br />

corner of <strong>the</strong> city <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present Tower of London. The<br />

earlier wall was founded on chalk <strong>and</strong> oak piles, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

later wall, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g reused build<strong>in</strong>g materials, dated<br />

from <strong>the</strong> last years of <strong>the</strong> 4th century (Goodburn 1978,<br />

453). The exist<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>and</strong>ward defences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern half of<br />

<strong>the</strong> city were also streng<strong>the</strong>ned with solid external towers<br />

(‘bastions’), built from reused materials. On co<strong>in</strong> evidence<br />

from around Bastion 6 <strong>the</strong>se are believed to date from <strong>the</strong><br />

period 35 1-75, as was a broad defensive ditch <strong>in</strong>to which<br />

<strong>the</strong> bastion projected.<br />

There is little archaeological evidence of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al stage<br />

of Roman London <strong>and</strong> its apparent demise dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!