Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...
Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...
Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
24 <strong>James</strong> <strong>Pritchard</strong><br />
from trial and error, emerged from the French Revolution and its<br />
great offspring, the Ecole polytechnique.102<br />
* * *<br />
A fortuitous combination of unusual factors and varied circumstances<br />
rather than any single cause ensured the superior quality of<br />
French warships during the 18th century. Though a case might be<br />
made for government-inspired scientific inquiry into naval problems<br />
and for technological transfer, these were probably the least important<br />
considerations. Such factors are certainly insufficient in themselves.<br />
The absence of any strong, hidebound, craft tradition of warship<br />
construction was probably more important, as, too, was more than half<br />
a century of rational collection, organization, and diffusion of preexisting<br />
craft skills.<br />
But, while significant, these factors, too, are inadequate either individually<br />
or in combination to account for the excellence achieved. The<br />
most important factors were administrative and social: first, the conscious<br />
desire, arising from the recognition by naval administrators of<br />
the need, to increase the social status of shipwrights and their ability to<br />
do so through ministerial order; second, the unknown but profound<br />
workings of administrative institutions to change social attitudes and<br />
values. For, out of the human and organizational chemistry of the<br />
councils of construction emerged the professionalization of the shipbuilders<br />
themselves. A final factor was Duhamel's introduction of<br />
constructors to a general mathematical culture, his rejection of theories<br />
that had no firmer foundation than hypothesis, and his insistence that<br />
constructors continue to contemplate the old rules for building ships to<br />
find the best practice-in other words, to combine mathematics and<br />
intuition.<br />
French warships owed their excellence to their builders, and it was<br />
during the 18th century that the latter became institutionalized and<br />
professionalized.'03 These elements, nontechnical and technical, led<br />
not so much to the successful application of the results of scientific<br />
inquiry to the challenge of good ship design as to the development of<br />
something newer and different, namely, the profession of naval engineering.<br />
Ironically, as the end of the Old Regime approached, the<br />
'02See Hahn (n. 25 above), pp. 282-85, for discussion of the changes in the educational<br />
norms for the engineering profession.<br />
'03Roger Hahn, "Scientific Careers in Eighteenth Century France," in The Emergence of<br />
Science in Western Europe (n. 85 above), pp. 127-28. Hahn emphasizes the role of these two<br />
social variables-institutionalization and professionalization-behind French scientific<br />
creativity and productivity during the 18th century.