05.04.2013 Views

Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...

Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...

Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24 <strong>James</strong> <strong>Pritchard</strong><br />

from trial and error, emerged from the French Revolution and its<br />

great offspring, the Ecole polytechnique.102<br />

* * *<br />

A fortuitous combination of unusual factors and varied circumstances<br />

rather than any single cause ensured the superior quality of<br />

French warships during the 18th century. Though a case might be<br />

made for government-inspired scientific inquiry into naval problems<br />

and for technological transfer, these were probably the least important<br />

considerations. Such factors are certainly insufficient in themselves.<br />

The absence of any strong, hidebound, craft tradition of warship<br />

construction was probably more important, as, too, was more than half<br />

a century of rational collection, organization, and diffusion of preexisting<br />

craft skills.<br />

But, while significant, these factors, too, are inadequate either individually<br />

or in combination to account for the excellence achieved. The<br />

most important factors were administrative and social: first, the conscious<br />

desire, arising from the recognition by naval administrators of<br />

the need, to increase the social status of shipwrights and their ability to<br />

do so through ministerial order; second, the unknown but profound<br />

workings of administrative institutions to change social attitudes and<br />

values. For, out of the human and organizational chemistry of the<br />

councils of construction emerged the professionalization of the shipbuilders<br />

themselves. A final factor was Duhamel's introduction of<br />

constructors to a general mathematical culture, his rejection of theories<br />

that had no firmer foundation than hypothesis, and his insistence that<br />

constructors continue to contemplate the old rules for building ships to<br />

find the best practice-in other words, to combine mathematics and<br />

intuition.<br />

French warships owed their excellence to their builders, and it was<br />

during the 18th century that the latter became institutionalized and<br />

professionalized.'03 These elements, nontechnical and technical, led<br />

not so much to the successful application of the results of scientific<br />

inquiry to the challenge of good ship design as to the development of<br />

something newer and different, namely, the profession of naval engineering.<br />

Ironically, as the end of the Old Regime approached, the<br />

'02See Hahn (n. 25 above), pp. 282-85, for discussion of the changes in the educational<br />

norms for the engineering profession.<br />

'03Roger Hahn, "Scientific Careers in Eighteenth Century France," in The Emergence of<br />

Science in Western Europe (n. 85 above), pp. 127-28. Hahn emphasizes the role of these two<br />

social variables-institutionalization and professionalization-behind French scientific<br />

creativity and productivity during the 18th century.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!