05.04.2013 Views

Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...

Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...

Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Professionalization of French <strong>Naval</strong> Shipbuilders<br />

teries of the shipbuilding craft. Each master finds his own secrets,<br />

claims them to be the best, guards them, and passes them to his sons.<br />

Duhamel viewed such methods, inopportunely called the rules and<br />

principles of construction, as mechanical and base. They were habitual,<br />

gave too much confidence, and were a major obstacle to the advancement<br />

of ship construction. Duhamel's textbook deliberately rejects an<br />

affirmative tone. "I have always thought," he wrote,<br />

that young people must be spurred on to use their mind and<br />

incited to acquire sagacity or at least increase what they naturally<br />

have: now nothing is so useful for that than the salutary doubt that<br />

Descartes advises, discussions that end in indecision and force<br />

young people to examine thoroughly the object on which they are<br />

working. In a word, I deemed it would be advantageous to put<br />

them in a fix from which they can only extricate themselves by<br />

reflections that give birth to ideas, ruminations that cause false<br />

ideas to be distinguished from true ones, [and] schemes that allow<br />

a decision on the choice to be made; ... a fixed fashion makes<br />

routine people.80<br />

Duhamel intended to teach his students something different from<br />

theoretical inquiry or observation or experiment and certainly not the<br />

so-called rules and principles of the shipwrights of old. Duhamel<br />

termed his teaching "the theory of [the constructor's] art," which<br />

combined trial and error with a search for mechanical principles and<br />

employment of mathematical calculations but rejected theory with no<br />

firmer foundation than hypothesis.81 <strong>To</strong> the degree that constructors<br />

followed his precepts, they would do honor to their profession and<br />

become exempt from the reproaches<br />

made to others.<br />

The structure of Duhamel's text supported his approach to learning.<br />

Each section deals with the several parts of constructing a ship. But<br />

nowhere does the author provide an ideal solution to the problems<br />

posed in each part. Instead, he presents several solutions. <strong>To</strong>day's<br />

engineers may claim that such a procedure<br />

does not differ from<br />

modern approaches to engineering. However, such a view ignores the<br />

trend toward the mathematization of science that occurred with<br />

accelerating rapidity during the 18th century. "Transcendent geometers"<br />

continually reduced mechanics to pure equations.<br />

The content of science moved ever farther away from the descriptive,<br />

ambiguous world of the shipbuilder, filled with limitations and<br />

constraints, toward a more extensive use of abstract concepts that<br />

80Ibid., p. viii.<br />

8'Ibid., pp. 322-25.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!