Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...
Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...
Pritchard, James; From Shipwright To Naval Constructor - Iowa State ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Professionalization of French <strong>Naval</strong> Shipbuilders<br />
teries of the shipbuilding craft. Each master finds his own secrets,<br />
claims them to be the best, guards them, and passes them to his sons.<br />
Duhamel viewed such methods, inopportunely called the rules and<br />
principles of construction, as mechanical and base. They were habitual,<br />
gave too much confidence, and were a major obstacle to the advancement<br />
of ship construction. Duhamel's textbook deliberately rejects an<br />
affirmative tone. "I have always thought," he wrote,<br />
that young people must be spurred on to use their mind and<br />
incited to acquire sagacity or at least increase what they naturally<br />
have: now nothing is so useful for that than the salutary doubt that<br />
Descartes advises, discussions that end in indecision and force<br />
young people to examine thoroughly the object on which they are<br />
working. In a word, I deemed it would be advantageous to put<br />
them in a fix from which they can only extricate themselves by<br />
reflections that give birth to ideas, ruminations that cause false<br />
ideas to be distinguished from true ones, [and] schemes that allow<br />
a decision on the choice to be made; ... a fixed fashion makes<br />
routine people.80<br />
Duhamel intended to teach his students something different from<br />
theoretical inquiry or observation or experiment and certainly not the<br />
so-called rules and principles of the shipwrights of old. Duhamel<br />
termed his teaching "the theory of [the constructor's] art," which<br />
combined trial and error with a search for mechanical principles and<br />
employment of mathematical calculations but rejected theory with no<br />
firmer foundation than hypothesis.81 <strong>To</strong> the degree that constructors<br />
followed his precepts, they would do honor to their profession and<br />
become exempt from the reproaches<br />
made to others.<br />
The structure of Duhamel's text supported his approach to learning.<br />
Each section deals with the several parts of constructing a ship. But<br />
nowhere does the author provide an ideal solution to the problems<br />
posed in each part. Instead, he presents several solutions. <strong>To</strong>day's<br />
engineers may claim that such a procedure<br />
does not differ from<br />
modern approaches to engineering. However, such a view ignores the<br />
trend toward the mathematization of science that occurred with<br />
accelerating rapidity during the 18th century. "Transcendent geometers"<br />
continually reduced mechanics to pure equations.<br />
The content of science moved ever farther away from the descriptive,<br />
ambiguous world of the shipbuilder, filled with limitations and<br />
constraints, toward a more extensive use of abstract concepts that<br />
80Ibid., p. viii.<br />
8'Ibid., pp. 322-25.<br />
19