GHENT UNIVERSITY Karoline FONCK - International Centre for ...
GHENT UNIVERSITY Karoline FONCK - International Centre for ...
GHENT UNIVERSITY Karoline FONCK - International Centre for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Syphilis tests were done using the RPR card test (Becton Dickinson, Maryland, USA) and<br />
positive samples were confirmed with Treponema pallidum haemagglutination test (TPHA,<br />
Randox Laboratories, UK). Serum HIV-1 antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked<br />
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Biochem immuno systems kit, Montreal, Canada) and<br />
positive samples were confirmed using double ELISA test (Biotech, Cambridge, Ireland).<br />
Data analysis was done using SPSS version 7.5. Pearson's Chi-square with Yates' correction<br />
was used to compare proportions and the t-test to compare means. ORs and their 95% CIs<br />
were used to measure strength of association.<br />
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Nairobi.<br />
Results<br />
From April 1997 to April 1998, an unselected group of 12,414 women who gave birth in the<br />
Pumwani Maternity Hospital (PMH) were screened <strong>for</strong> syphilis. Of them, 377 (3%) were RPR<br />
reactive. Of those 377 women, 117 (31%) had already been identified RPR positive earlier<br />
on during pregnancy while 155 (41%) had been RPR negative and 105 (28%) had not been<br />
tested during pregnancy.<br />
Postpartum, partner notification in<strong>for</strong>mation was provided to 357 of the 377 RPR-positive<br />
women and 127 (36%) of their partners came <strong>for</strong> treatment. Forty-two (33%) of those<br />
partners had already been treated during pregnancy and of them 12 (29%) were still RPR<br />
positive at the time of delivery. Twenty-two men (17%) declined to be tested <strong>for</strong> syphilis. Of<br />
the 105 men tested, 33 (31%) were RPR positive. Fourteen men had a positive RPR test but<br />
negative TPHA test, suggesting a new early infection or a false positive RPR test.<br />
Table 1 shows the characteristics of women whose partners came <strong>for</strong> treatment and those<br />
who did not turn up. There was no difference in education, history of alcohol use, parity, bad<br />
obstetrical history, HIV status or number of sex partners in the past year. Women whose<br />
partners did not come <strong>for</strong> treatment however were younger (P=0.01), more likely to be<br />
unmarried (P