05.04.2013 Views

GHENT UNIVERSITY Karoline FONCK - International Centre for ...

GHENT UNIVERSITY Karoline FONCK - International Centre for ...

GHENT UNIVERSITY Karoline FONCK - International Centre for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Once data entry was completed, they were checked through comparison with the<br />

questionnaires. Preliminary data analysis permitted to detect errors in data entry. For the<br />

larger studies, double data entry was per<strong>for</strong>med. After data cleaning, analysis took place in<br />

Nairobi but also in the overseas collaborating universities. Results were discussed with<br />

scientific staff including a statistician, epidemiologists, behavioral scientists, fellow<br />

researchers etc.<br />

In univariate analysis, the Odds Ratios were used <strong>for</strong> the measurement of association of<br />

proportions. Comparisons were made using Pearson’s χ 2 and Fisher’s exact tests. T test was<br />

used <strong>for</strong> comparison of means. Logistic regression was used to take into account risk factors<br />

and presence of other STIs <strong>for</strong> the risk of HIV infection.<br />

2.2.5. Data dissemination<br />

As the main aim of the research studies was to assess the quality and effectiveness of<br />

existing STI prevention and control interventions, in order to be able to improve on them, it<br />

has always been a priority to disseminate the results of the studies to the interested parties.<br />

The results were discussed at the monthly steering committee where the National Aids<br />

Control Program (NASCOP, MoH) and the European Commission were represented besides<br />

the main partners, the University of Nairobi and the Nairobi City Council. Copies of finalized<br />

papers were sent to interested parties including the NASCOP.<br />

2.2.6. Conclusion<br />

Consideration was given to issues such as quality of data collection and data entry, training<br />

of research staff, quality control of laboratory results and data analysis. Nevertheless,<br />

because of the methodological difficulties specific to this kind of research, some drawbacks<br />

were unavoidable (logistic and administrative problems, loss to follow-up) and will be<br />

discussed in detail in each chapter as well as in the general conclusion.<br />

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!