Czechoslovak Political Prisoners - über das Projekt Political ...
Czechoslovak Political Prisoners - über das Projekt Political ... Czechoslovak Political Prisoners - über das Projekt Political ...
Never ending desire for freedom-escapes The conditions in prisons and working camps were inhuman – lack of food, hard work, unhealthy conditions, and the nonstop hassling. That is why some prisoners decided to do something about it and they planned an escape. The escapes were done in various ways. Sometimes it was individuals and sometimes it was organized in groups. Some escapes were done without much thought and depended on the opportunity at hand. Others were planned with great detail for a couple of months, for example the very popular dig for freedom in a camp called Nikolaj. As for the unsuccessful ones those were lost because the very participants of the escape were not careful and they revealed their plans to too many people. The prisoners always appreciated the subordination of the successful groups to escape and also when there were many people involved in the plan. Then they did not mind either toussing or repressions that logically followed. Jožka Hošek wrote in his book, “All men stopped being tired and no one was really mad at the group that escaped. On the contrary, the whole camp was kind of empowered with happiness that the escape was successful.” Anyway there were many escapes that were constructed and provoked by the headquarters of prisons or camps. In fact the biggest escape in the history of the labor camps is the one when twenty prisoners escaped from the mine “Kamenná” on November 29, 1952. At this escape of prisoners there were two mine guards and there was also one master involved. The prisoners stole explosives and they used this to make a tunnel from the mines, but soon after escape they were caught. In 1953 they were tried again and their new sentences were around three years for prisoners and around eighteen months for the civilian employees. At that time these sentences were really low. The most tragic consequence was during the attempted escape of twelve prisoners from mine number 14 near Slavkov. These were prisoners from camp XII and they escaped on October 15, 1951. Only four prisoners survived alive, Karel Kukal, was able to give us a testimony in his book called, Ten Crosses. Two of these prisoners were sentenced to death and the third one lost his memory after the inhuman beatings. Karel Kukal himself was sentenced to another twenty-five years 33 . The dead bodies of the participants were taken back to the camp and this left many bad memories for all prisoners who were eyewitnesses. The bodies of their friends were thrown into the middle of the courtyard and those who were caught alive had to stand next to them and the whole camp had to march along it when no one was allowed to pay their respects. If someone did it, they were put into solitary confinement for a couple of days. Jožka Jelínek describes this experience, “From that moment we had hardly any sense of forgiveness. Even for priest, who had “love the enemy” in their job description, this commandment became a life-long problem.” The escape has another dimension though that is important to mention here. I remember one interview with Alois Macek who was arrested as a nineteen-year-old and sentenced to sit for 12 years. In camp Mariánská his friends decided to escape and since they knew Mr. Macek had a similar attitude they told him about their plans. Alois Macek refused to participate though because they were planning on killing one of the guards on their way. The escape was ruined and all of them were caught, than followed cruel interrogations and a search for other prisoners who were aware of the plan and did not say a word. After sometime it was revealed that Mr. Alois Macek knew about it. Later, a huge “Monster Process” was organized and many peo- 33 See more in the interview with Doctor Jan Pospíšil. Czechoslovak Political Prisoners 23
ple working in the camp as guards watched it. Four death penalties were sentenced and Alois Macek got off with only “20 years” of imprisonment. When telling me this sad story where four young lives were lost, Mr. Macek also told me, “Since then I have always had on my mind, “If I had reported the planned escape the whole Confederation of political prisoners would never have talked to me, I would be the worst bastard, in camp others would be kicking me and my life would not be worth it, but four people would be alive.” It was the highest principle I simply couldn’t break.” As Mr. Macek says it was the “highest principle” he could not break. This was a principle set deep in the prisoner’s code of ethics, as well as the rule that nobody would snitch. On the other hand this example shows us, in what kind of marginal situations prisoners were often put in and how their decision can lay heavily and haunt them up until today. Many other successful and unsuccessful escapes were attempted. All of them have one thing in common though – the desire for freedom. Freedom was withheld by the communist regime for some years, although these people fought for democracy, human rights, and freedom of speech. Even long-term imprisonment cannot break the human spirit People who were sentenced by communist justice, often to very high imprisonments, suddenly stood at the edge of society. They did not only have to spend their best years behind bars, but this pursuit was extended for the rest of their lives after release. They had difficulties to find jobs, which they would deserve according to their education 34 . Despite this fact it is admirable that some of them were able to reconcile with this situation and they do not recall it with bitterness how we would expect. Jakub Antonín Zemek describes this, “It was hard but beautiful times. One could meet a lot of good, hard, high-principled and upright people.” Other people remember these times in a similar way, for example Tomáš Sedláček says, “My time in prison offered me a chance to get to know myself. What I am like and what I can bare. I really found my possibilities and where is my potential bottom. I was lucky that I went to prison in very good physical and psychological condition. As I already mentioned I was always waking up with the motto, “Hold on!” and this really kept me above water. Also, I met a lot of people who remained my friends for the rest of my life. How I was able to go through my life with my conscience clear and my backbone straight is the thing for the others to judge. I hope I managed it quite well.” Others appreciated the experience they had a chance to develop in prison. They mentioned they were influenced by great chance meetings with other people and the prison university, which deeply touched their lives. The question that is easy to ask is will they ever forgive their incarcerators? Hana Truncová replied, “To tell you from my own opinion, I have never forgiven them because they stole a huge piece of my life and I had my own plans that can never be given back. I only wanted to live in freedom, travel, and do everything that would make me happy. All of that was very limited.” We can not wonder about this, but on the other hand when these people are telling you about their imprisonment, you can feel this period of life 34 The majority of people were released in 1960 via a Presidential pardon. The pardon did not take away the sentence, but only the punishment. So these people were still criminals, many of them were released on probation and they were worried that if they commit any minor offence they would be arrested again. When they were released they had to sign a document that they would never speak about their experience. The fact that some of them were afraid to commit minor offences for example a ticket for speeding is documented on the words of Josef Stejskal, “I asked for an effacement of my crime. I already had a driving license and I knew as a driver I could easily get into trouble with the law and as a person who was in prison I would get a high sentence.” 24
- Page 1 and 2: This book introduces ten victims of
- Page 3 and 4: Co-financed by the European Union w
- Page 6 and 7: Preface This book is part of a larg
- Page 8 and 9: Historical Overview Postwar Develop
- Page 10 and 11: political parties and especially to
- Page 12 and 13: ple’s Militia was established: th
- Page 14 and 15: The whole trial was effected by com
- Page 16 and 17: The incarcerated were beaten in var
- Page 18 and 19: escapee could be seen well. In the
- Page 20 and 21: For women there was a prison in Par
- Page 22 and 23: were people who worshiped moral sta
- Page 26 and 27: was one of the biggest experiences
- Page 28 and 29: Interview with Mrs. Jindřiška Hav
- Page 30 and 31: Murzin 5 , a new commander, was sup
- Page 32 and 33: adio what was happening. Then we we
- Page 34 and 35: to get. She was supposed to give a
- Page 36 and 37: Were you sharing the room with crim
- Page 38 and 39: What things could you get in the ca
- Page 40 and 41: there is joy and peace everywhere a
- Page 42 and 43: her. When one laughed, we all laugh
- Page 44 and 45: Interview with Julie Hrušková Whe
- Page 46 and 47: the Communist Party? Are you a memb
- Page 48 and 49: were looking for me and they had my
- Page 50 and 51: Where did they take you after the t
- Page 52 and 53: some warm water we were happy to be
- Page 54 and 55: ter and we were also allowed to rec
- Page 56 and 57: luntly about this or that in a way
- Page 58 and 59: The children of a relative of mine,
- Page 60 and 61: Interview with Mrs. Květoslava Mor
- Page 62 and 63: Did you have to pay taxes to the Ge
- Page 64 and 65: elatives live there.” That’s wh
- Page 66 and 67: a place called “járek,” where
- Page 68 and 69: a drying house. Then we picked toma
- Page 70 and 71: What was your release like? Well, I
- Page 72 and 73: Czechoslovak Political Prisoners 71
Never ending desire for freedom-escapes<br />
The conditions in prisons and working camps were inhuman – lack of food, hard work, unhealthy<br />
conditions, and the nonstop hassling. That is why some prisoners decided to do something<br />
about it and they planned an escape. The escapes were done in various ways. Sometimes<br />
it was individuals and sometimes it was organized in groups. Some escapes were done without<br />
much thought and depended on the opportunity at hand. Others were planned with great<br />
detail for a couple of months, for example the very popular dig for freedom in a camp called<br />
Nikolaj. As for the unsuccessful ones those were lost because the very participants of the escape<br />
were not careful and they revealed their plans to too many people. The prisoners always<br />
appreciated the subordination of the successful groups to escape and also when there were<br />
many people involved in the plan. Then they did not mind either toussing or repressions that<br />
logically followed. Jožka Hošek wrote in his book, “All men stopped being tired and no one<br />
was really mad at the group that escaped. On the contrary, the whole camp was kind of empowered<br />
with happiness that the escape was successful.” Anyway there were many escapes<br />
that were constructed and provoked by the headquarters of prisons or camps. In fact the biggest<br />
escape in the history of the labor camps is the one when twenty prisoners escaped from<br />
the mine “Kamenná” on November 29, 1952. At this escape of prisoners there were two mine<br />
guards and there was also one master involved. The prisoners stole explosives and they used<br />
this to make a tunnel from the mines, but soon after escape they were caught. In 1953 they<br />
were tried again and their new sentences were around three years for prisoners and around<br />
eighteen months for the civilian employees. At that time these sentences were really low.<br />
The most tragic consequence was during the attempted escape of twelve prisoners from<br />
mine number 14 near Slavkov. These were prisoners from camp XII and they escaped on October<br />
15, 1951. Only four prisoners survived alive, Karel Kukal, was able to give us a testimony<br />
in his book called, Ten Crosses. Two of these prisoners were sentenced to death and the third<br />
one lost his memory after the inhuman beatings. Karel Kukal himself was sentenced to another<br />
twenty-five years 33 . The dead bodies of the participants were taken back to the camp and this<br />
left many bad memories for all prisoners who were eyewitnesses. The bodies of their friends<br />
were thrown into the middle of the courtyard and those who were caught alive had to stand<br />
next to them and the whole camp had to march along it when no one was allowed to pay their<br />
respects. If someone did it, they were put into solitary confinement for a couple of days. Jožka<br />
Jelínek describes this experience, “From that moment we had hardly any sense of forgiveness.<br />
Even for priest, who had “love the enemy” in their job description, this commandment became<br />
a life-long problem.”<br />
The escape has another dimension though that is important to mention here. I remember one<br />
interview with Alois Macek who was arrested as a nineteen-year-old and sentenced to sit for<br />
12 years. In camp Mariánská his friends decided to escape and since they knew Mr. Macek had<br />
a similar attitude they told him about their plans. Alois Macek refused to participate though<br />
because they were planning on killing one of the guards on their way. The escape was ruined<br />
and all of them were caught, than followed cruel interrogations and a search for other prisoners<br />
who were aware of the plan and did not say a word. After sometime it was revealed that<br />
Mr. Alois Macek knew about it. Later, a huge “Monster Process” was organized and many peo-<br />
33 See more in the interview with Doctor Jan Pospíšil.<br />
<strong>Czechoslovak</strong> <strong>Political</strong> <strong>Prisoners</strong> 23