Ana Maria Gruia - "Saint George on Medieval Stove - PATZINAKIA
Ana Maria Gruia - "Saint George on Medieval Stove - PATZINAKIA Ana Maria Gruia - "Saint George on Medieval Stove - PATZINAKIA
- Page 1: Studia Patzinaka, 3, 2006, pp. 7-48
- Page 5 and 6: Saint Geor
- Page 7 and 8: Saint Geor
- Page 9 and 10: Saint Geor
- Page 11 and 12: Saint Geor
- Page 13 and 14: Saint Geor
- Page 15 and 16: Saint Geor
- Page 17 and 18: Saint Geor
- Page 19 and 20: Saint Geor
- Page 21 and 22: Saint Geor
- Page 23 and 24: Saint Geor
- Page 25 and 26: M 17 M 18 M 19 M 20 M 21 M 22 M 23
- Page 27 and 28: W1 0 W1 1 W1 2 W1 3 W1 4 W1 5 W1 6
- Page 29 and 30: Saint Geor
- Page 31 and 32: Saint Geor
- Page 33 and 34: Saint Geor
- Page 35 and 36: Saint Geor
- Page 37 and 38: Saint Geor
- Page 39 and 40: ASTRA, 2006 Andronic, M., 1986-7 An
- Page 41 and 42: Gruia, 2004 Kémen
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Ana</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Maria</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Gruia</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
from the (Catholic) Western Europe, some are clearly used in Orthodox c<strong>on</strong>texts.<br />
How is such an adopti<strong>on</strong> visible at an ic<strong>on</strong>ographical level? How do Catholic<br />
and Orthodox traditi<strong>on</strong>s merge in the decorati<strong>on</strong> of utilitarian objects such as<br />
stove tiles? Is any of the styles more popular in any of the three regi<strong>on</strong>s? Did the<br />
different ethnic groups from these areas (Hungarians, Szeklers, Sax<strong>on</strong>s, and<br />
Romanians) prefer certain images of St. <str<strong>on</strong>g>George</str<strong>on</strong>g>? And how did the motifs<br />
circulate geographically and socially? These are some of the questi<strong>on</strong> I will try to<br />
answer, or at least I will argue whether there is enough evidence for answering<br />
them.<br />
Gathering the primary material for this research implied a selecti<strong>on</strong>. I<br />
left out those fragments too small for a positive identificati<strong>on</strong>, even if they have<br />
been published as depicting (probably) <str<strong>on</strong>g>Saint</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>George</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Some tiles I rejected since<br />
more recent research 2 showed they did not depict the military saint but just a<br />
rider (<strong>on</strong>e tile from Sibiu and a similar fragment from Gusu 3 ). For the tiles<br />
included in the analysis, I kept the dating of the authors. And as a general rule I<br />
included all those tiles and fragments which depicted St. <str<strong>on</strong>g>George</str<strong>on</strong>g> with certainty<br />
or at least with a higher degree of probability. I ended up with 63 entries<br />
(counting as <strong>on</strong>e even fragments from more tiles but depicting the same<br />
ic<strong>on</strong>ography found <strong>on</strong> the same site) 4 . All data <strong>on</strong> each entry, including the<br />
bibliography, is indicated in the annexed table. It would be too l<strong>on</strong>g to list and<br />
give the bibliographic indicati<strong>on</strong>s for all the fragments I rejected.<br />
The cult of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Saint</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>George</str<strong>on</strong>g> is attested in Asia Minor already in the fourth<br />
century, in Western Europe in the sixth century, and until the middle ages he<br />
was worshiped <strong>on</strong>ly as martyr. Sometime in the eleventh century a Byzantine<br />
hagiographer added to the legend the drag<strong>on</strong>-slaying episode so typical for<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>George</str<strong>on</strong>g> throughout the middle ages. Drag<strong>on</strong>-slayer <str<strong>on</strong>g>George</str<strong>on</strong>g> appears in Byzantine<br />
art in the twelfth century, both in the East and in Italy, from where it spread<br />
2 Daniela Marcu Istrate, „ O nouă variantă de cavaler în ic<strong>on</strong>ografia cahlelor din Transilvania” (A<br />
New Variant of the Knight in Tournament Scene <strong>on</strong> Transylvanian <strong>Stove</strong> Tiles) presented during the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Transylvanian Tiles organized by the ASTRA Museum in Sibiu, May 2006.<br />
3 Sibiu: Daniela Marcu Istrate, Cahle din Transilvania şi Banat de la începuturi până la 1700 (<strong>Stove</strong> Tiles<br />
from Transylvania and Banat from the Beginnings to 1700), Cluj-Napoca: Accent, 2004 (henceforth<br />
Marcu Istrate, 2004) 270, cat. Sibiu 7.5, 474, fig. 5. Gusu: Marcu-Istrate, 2004, 236, cat. Gusu 1.<br />
4 The reas<strong>on</strong> for this simplificati<strong>on</strong> is due to the fact that in most cases the archaeological publicati<strong>on</strong><br />
does not menti<strong>on</strong> from how many individual tiles the fragments came from and so a quantitative<br />
analysis would be unbalanced. On the base of published informati<strong>on</strong>, these images decorated a<br />
minimum number of 174 stove tiles in Transylvania, Moldavia and Wallachia. I refer to my entries<br />
simply as tiles but <strong>on</strong>e has to bear in mind that there might be more stove tiles decorated with the<br />
same image and found in the same place. When such informati<strong>on</strong> is available, it is menti<strong>on</strong>ed in the<br />
annexed table.<br />
8