Rep o rt of th e tw en - Rotterdam Convention
Rep o rt of th e tw en - Rotterdam Convention
Rep o rt of th e tw en - Rotterdam Convention
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10.3.3 Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e progress in Integrated Pest Managem<strong>en</strong>t<br />
The country delegates highlighted <strong>th</strong>e key achievem<strong>en</strong>ts in IPM, <strong>th</strong>e details <strong>of</strong> which had<br />
already be<strong>en</strong> pres<strong>en</strong>ted in <strong>th</strong>e g<strong>en</strong>eral meeting under ag<strong>en</strong>da item 8.<br />
Delegates also reviewed <strong>th</strong>e progress made against <strong>th</strong>e recomm<strong>en</strong>dations proposed in <strong>th</strong>e<br />
work plan <strong>of</strong> 2003-2005 <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e 23 rd Session <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e APPPC. In most countries, <strong>th</strong>e achievem<strong>en</strong>ts<br />
had be<strong>en</strong> in line wi<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e proposed work plan <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e 23 rd APPPC.<br />
The delegates, while reviewing <strong>th</strong>e past effo<strong>rt</strong>s, recognized <strong>th</strong>e achievem<strong>en</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e IPM<br />
implem<strong>en</strong>tation in <strong>th</strong>e APPPC region using <strong>th</strong>e FFS approach and pointed out various chall<strong>en</strong>ges<br />
for <strong>th</strong>e region:<br />
i. Safe food<br />
ii. Increased farmers’ income<br />
iii. Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
iv. Developing guidelines for applicability <strong>of</strong> FFS-IPM approach to all main cropping systems<br />
v. Regional research on <strong>th</strong>e role <strong>of</strong> GMOs in IPM<br />
vi. Linking IPM and Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)<br />
vii. IPM for invasive species<br />
viii. Awar<strong>en</strong>ess about IPM and GAP<br />
ix. Increased use <strong>of</strong> Biological Control in IPM and GAP<br />
x. GAP Standards<br />
xi Regional cooperation on monitoring and managem<strong>en</strong>t <strong>of</strong> major migratory pests<br />
10.3.4 Proposed work plan (2005-2007)<br />
The Group recomm<strong>en</strong>ded:<br />
i. Developing programmes in pa<strong>rt</strong>icipating countries to link IPM and GAP<br />
ii. Research on GAP Standards according to relevant needs <strong>of</strong> countries in <strong>th</strong>e region<br />
iii. Organization <strong>of</strong> yearly workshop by APPPC Secretariat to share experi<strong>en</strong>ces <strong>of</strong><br />
implem<strong>en</strong>ting GAP in member countries<br />
iv. Approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e FAO-ASEAN and FAO-SAARC initiative on Farmer Education in IPM<br />
and GAP<br />
v. Introducing HACCP in ho<strong>rt</strong>iculture<br />
vi. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e impact <strong>of</strong> GMOs<br />
10.3.5 Discussions on <strong>th</strong>e pres<strong>en</strong>tation<br />
10.3.5.1 Position <strong>of</strong> transg<strong>en</strong>ic crops in APPPC<br />
The Conv<strong>en</strong>tion duly noted <strong>th</strong>e growing interest in transg<strong>en</strong>ic crops, and would study its<br />
position in APPPC.<br />
34