Rep o rt of th e tw en - Rotterdam Convention
Rep o rt of th e tw en - Rotterdam Convention
Rep o rt of th e tw en - Rotterdam Convention
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
farmers. A new programme “3 reduction 3 gain” was initiated and <strong>th</strong>e first success was recorded<br />
soon after <strong>th</strong>e implem<strong>en</strong>tation.<br />
The plant quarantine system was fu<strong>rt</strong>her str<strong>en</strong>g<strong>th</strong><strong>en</strong>ed and received suppo<strong>rt</strong> from <strong>th</strong>e<br />
Governm<strong>en</strong>t and international bodies. The legislation on plant quarantine continued to be reviewed/<br />
am<strong>en</strong>ded in line wi<strong>th</strong> IPPC, WTO/SPS and o<strong>th</strong>er international/regional standards. Up till pres<strong>en</strong>t,<br />
<strong>th</strong>ree ISPMs (1, 2 and 5) have be<strong>en</strong> adopted as national standards, and <strong>th</strong>ree o<strong>th</strong>er ISPMs (4, 6<br />
and 8) will be adopted <strong>th</strong>is year. ISPM No. 15 “Guidelines for wood packaging materials” was<br />
implem<strong>en</strong>ted on 1 October 2004 for expo<strong>rt</strong> commodities.<br />
Pesticide registration and managem<strong>en</strong>t schemes continued to improve. As <strong>of</strong> April 2005,<br />
491 a.i. wi<strong>th</strong> 1 403 trade names were registered for use, 17 a.i. including 29 trade names <strong>of</strong> pesticides<br />
were restricted for use and 28 a.i. were banned, including <strong>en</strong>dosulfan (banned from April 2005).<br />
Bio-pesticides were also <strong>en</strong>couraged to be used for pest control, and more <strong>th</strong>an 60 products were<br />
registered.<br />
At pres<strong>en</strong>t, <strong>th</strong>e Plant Protection Depa<strong>rt</strong>m<strong>en</strong>t–NPPO carries out <strong>th</strong>e following international<br />
projects/programmes:<br />
i. IPM in rice assisted by DANIDA, D<strong>en</strong>mark Governm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
ii. Phytosanitary Capacity Building Project for <strong>th</strong>e Mekong Region (CLMV) Countries,<br />
second Phase assisted by NZAID, New Zealand Governm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
iii. Improvem<strong>en</strong>t <strong>of</strong> Plant Quarantine Treatm<strong>en</strong>t Against Fruit Flies on Fresh Fruits<br />
2005-2007 assisted by JICA, Japan Governm<strong>en</strong>t<br />
iv. Integrating Effective Phosphine Fumigation Practices into Grain Storage System in<br />
Australia, China and Viet Nam assisted by ACIAR, Australia<br />
v. Various trainings/workshops under ASEAN cooperation programme<br />
Regional and international organization repo<strong>rt</strong>s<br />
3.21 J apan (observer)<br />
Japan is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e major impo<strong>rt</strong>ing countries <strong>of</strong> agricultural products in <strong>th</strong>e world. As various<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> agricultural products from many counties were impo<strong>rt</strong>ed, <strong>th</strong>ere were concerns about <strong>th</strong>e<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> new ali<strong>en</strong> pests. Under <strong>th</strong>ese circumstances, Japan’s plant quarantine au<strong>th</strong>ority<br />
implem<strong>en</strong>ted appropriate phytosanitary measures and improved <strong>th</strong>e plant quarantine system to prev<strong>en</strong>t<br />
<strong>th</strong>e introduction <strong>of</strong> new ali<strong>en</strong> pests in accordance wi<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e WTO-SPS Agreem<strong>en</strong>t and relevant<br />
international standards on phytosanitary measures.<br />
To facilitate IPM, MAFF felt it was necessary for prefectural governm<strong>en</strong>ts to develop <strong>th</strong>e<br />
indicator for farmers to easily compreh<strong>en</strong>d <strong>th</strong>e degree <strong>of</strong> activities related to IPM practice. To do<br />
so, MAFF established an expe<strong>rt</strong> group in last November and <strong>th</strong>e group had be<strong>en</strong> examining<br />
“<strong>th</strong>e Guideline for <strong>th</strong>e IPM Practice Indicators”.<br />
The Plant Protection Station (PPS) initiated a pest risk analysis for <strong>th</strong>e quarantine pests <strong>of</strong><br />
impo<strong>rt</strong>ed wood packages to prev<strong>en</strong>t such pests from being introduced into Japan. The PRA-repo<strong>rt</strong><br />
had be<strong>en</strong> completed and published at <strong>th</strong>e website <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e PPS last March. (The URL is http://<br />
www.pps.go.jp.)<br />
24